Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Recommended Posts

After criticizing hes way to lead the dutch he shot with chains on my sail.

Hes excuse was "sry missed"

 

 

Edited by PioGaming

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was shooting my clanmate, check the logs admin. Put a full broadside into him later. Should have left as battle had ended if he didn't want to get shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:

I was shooting my clanmate, check the logs admin. Put a full broadside into him later. Should have left as battle had ended if he didn't want to get shot.

Worst excuse ever ... 😆

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:

I was shooting my clanmate, check the logs admin. Put a full broadside into him later. Should have left as battle had ended if he didn't want to get shot.

better go back to writing in your newspaper :D

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe because of these green on greens, we might have to add shot zones, so if you're aiming so you have focused an friendly ship in the top right corner, you cant fire your cannons..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, erelkivtuadrater said:

maybe because of these green on greens, we might have to add shot zones, so if you're aiming so you have focused an friendly ship in the top right corner, you cant fire your cannons..

Too easy to exploit. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please clarify - is the shot fired after the battle was over and was it done only once?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Battle was over, wich is seen at the top. He threatened to sink me when i leave. So i was staying in battle.

I think he shot my sails just to bully me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Ink said:

Could you please clarify - is the shot fired after the battle was over and was it done only once?

It was shot after the battle was over and it was only done once.

We did tag him and kill him after I won't deny it.

He's just upset we killed him.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MassimoSud said:

better go back to writing in your newspaper :D

 

777hla.jpg

it clearly says battle OVER

GWC news with the real FACTS... ,  with the eye for detail..

at your service :)

Edited by Thonys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:

It was shot after the battle was over and it was only done once.

We did tag him and kill him after I won't deny it.

He's just upset we killed him.

It is stil gren on gren. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bryan Von Gyldenloeve said:

It is stil gren on gren. 

Thats the point.

Also 

Quote

It was shot after the battle was over and it was only done once.

So he was lying by saying 

Quote

I was shooting my clanmate

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

true, but atleast you wont have the problem with friendly fire. Now you cant shoot a ship when your friend  is between you and your enemy because you might get reported for green on green, but it would certainly solve alot of green on green cases

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it made him use 2 or so rig repairs when he shouldn't even have to use them(or otherwise force to stay with this much damage on his sails)
and it might have made him easier to catch if he had no more repairs
so yeah everything on the video is clear and shouldn't even happen

if you shot maybe a few cannonballs which do not do a lot into your teammate just because you had to fire rest of the broadside into the enemy it's fine, but it is clear on the video that he just made a lot of damage on a single target in his own team, and it's clear that he wanted to do this green on green because there weren't even any enemy players close

Edited by Captain2Strong
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, gimli_balinson said:

I don’t see the problem here ... it didn’t bring u in danger u was always able to leave...

The problem is it is trying to force him to leave a battle that is finished instead of waiting the 15 minutes for the instance to close just so he can tag him in OW to sink him. If he was low on repairs the additional damage taken could affect his ability to repair for the next battle. 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe demote him because he has been here long enough to know the rules and did it anyway. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Teutonic said:

maybe once battle ends no more damage can be done?

Demage has been taken. See how my Sail % goes down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Thonys said:

it clearly says battle OVER

GWC news with the real FACTS... ,  with the eye for detail..

at your service :)

You still lose HP (sail/hull) = need to repair  + you can even sink after battle is over

Its like hitting someone and say "Dont be such a sissy pain will go away" While its actual right pain will go away does it make hitting someone legal?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he doesn't get punished then that would mean that it's okay for me and my clan mates to shoot on someone from another nation that joins on our side after 'battle over', while he is trying to loot maybe? then we can tag him afterwards and sink him ez? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, z4ys said:

You still lose HP (sail/hull) = need to repair  + you can even sink after battle is over

Its like hitting someone and say "Dont be such a sissy pain will go away" While its actual right pain will go away does it make hitting someone legal?

i know in Martial Arts that if you are still beating or continuing submission when your  opponent is knocked/tapped out, you get disqualified and usually banned from further competition.

Now from what i've seen from @Gregory Rainsborough in terms of skill i dont think he missed his chain broadside, its a clear chain broadside to the largest parts of the sails, even that its infact chain and not ball rounds explains alot. IMO he chained him to make him spend repairs for the next battle.

Only way as i see it to solve these tribunals is adding a full free for all RoE where you cant damage or do minimal damage to flags of the same nation, so the nation you infact are in are your friends in battle and whatever other nation is free to kill

Edited by erelkivtuadrater

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Archaos said:

The problem is it is trying to force him to leave a battle that is finished instead of waiting the 15 minutes for the instance to close just so he can tag him in OW to sink him. If he was low on repairs the additional damage taken could affect his ability to repair for the next battle. 

But why are we forced to be friendly to an enemy nation that joins on our side. I still think Green on Green should only pertain to same nations in a battle.  All other nations should be Free for all cause I wouldn't let just some pirate come help me or the current enemy I'm at war with just cause he joined my side of a battle. 

Of course this isn't the PvP zones where we are suppose to join up with sides and kill each other, the problem seems to be a OW in actually zones we are fighting over with multi nations.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...