Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Proposition by the French Council - Southern Alliance


Aquillas

Recommended Posts

“Au nom du Roi”, and according to the last decisions of the French Council:

fleur-de-lys.jpg.8f9b91e8df6a51f9a09481ee44f1619c.jpg

 

@ScipioTortuga @Celtiberofrog @Batman @Gregory Rainsborough

Southern Alliance:

According to preliminary contacts with the diplomats of those countries, an alliance treaty is proposed by France to United Provinces (Verenigde Provinciën), Spain and Great Britain. The rules of this “Southern Alliance” being as follows:

  • If one port of the Southern Alliance is attacked, the other nations of the Alliance will help the attacked nation by screen fleets, to prevent the enemy PB fleet to enter in the Port Battle.
  • If one nation of the Southern Alliance attacks a port, help shall be demanded to other countries of the alliance through appropriate diplomatic channels. A diplomatic Club shall be created for easy communication (Southern Alliance Club)
  • If one nation of the Southern Alliance attacks another nation of the Southern Alliance, the attacking notion could be excluded from the Alliance after necessary checking and diplomatic conciliation by other diplomats.
  • Training PB’s can be made inside the Alliance on minor ports (rules to be disclosed in the Southern Alliance Club).
  • Traders of the Southern Alliance can in principle freely sail to any port of the Alliance in smuggler mode. They should not be attacked by defence fleets, but they must stay careful because of possible attacks by enemy alts and rogue players. The Southern Alliance cannot be taken as responsible for piracy.
  • War ships do not have the same protection and will have obligation to declare their intentions the defence fleets when approaching ports of other nations of the Alliance (to prevent undesired actions by rogue players or by enemy alts).

A formal agreement to the terms of this alliance is demanded to diplomats of involved nations (VP, ES and GB), before Tuesday 19th of December (for a proper synchronisation with the server merge).

In the case of too long and unexplained hesitation from diplomats of some nation, the Alliance could be proposed to other nations, by a coordinated proposition of from diplomats of nations having ever agreed to the Southern Alliance.

 

War objectives for France

1- Defence Fleet (protection of traders and Lieutenant Commanders).

  • Enemy raiders shall be chased off the French areas by appropriate Defence Fleets, in particular off Fort-Royal. All French players present on zone shall participate to these fleets.
  • Enemy ships shall be destroyed there without taking into account potential complains messages about unbalanced fights or ganks.
  • Reprisal raids could be organized against the enemy capitals in case of repeated attacks on Fort-Royal or other French ports.

 

2- French War objectives

  • Not to be disclosed here.
  • Propositions are ready to be made to Southern Alliance diplomats.

 

This topic is the translation of the French one, located here:

http://forum.game-labs.net/topic/23978-proposititon-par-le-conseil-france-alliance-sud/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Christendom said:

I don't get why 4 nations would want to ally up and limit their PVP hunting prospects.  

More screen battles, coordination, demands and answers for help... All that should create more PvP, without loosing hours for running after gankers or for finding targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think spantards are interested in an alliance with Britain. As I said before, personally I don't mind being allied with Spain personally, but they have to stop playing this game with history glasses on. France made the first step towards a healthier game by successfully ending their civil war (whatever that means for GB-FR alliance I don't care. We all love this game and should keep the little playerbase we have left, not drive them away with constant toxicity towards each other).

Of course Spain is already allied with russia, so that has to be sorted out as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spanish "Real Acuerdo de Indias" will stick to the below relationship.

It is pointless to imagine any cooperation with Brits unless they make proposal that would include the withdrawal of Louisianna Occidental & Apalache.

Current political positionning of our confederation:

Note: Without clear issues or declaration our positionning will take into account the proportion of opponents clan members involved in our PB . 

 

USA                     ==> Military Alliance

                                           Neutral clans : awaiting positionning

 

Great Britain     ==> At War with SLRN ; GNF ; BCC ; RSC ; TITAN ; AHOY ; DOGZ ; XCLAN ; CH

                                  Neutral clans : awaiting positionning

 

Sweeden           ==> Neutral with all clans

 

Dutch                ==> Neutral with all clans

                                  Friendly clan : PERVS

 

Danemark         ==> At War with BF    

                                  Neutral clans : awaiting positionning

 

Poland               ==> Neutral with all clans

 

Prussia             ==> Neutral with all clans

 

Russia               ==> Neutral with all clans

                                          Friendly clan : REDS ; RUS ; USSR

                                       

France              ==> Ceasefire with EDR (bilateral agreement towards neutrality)

                                Neutral clans : CBC ; MRF ; ER ; VCA

                                Other clans : awaiting positionning

 

Pirates             ==> At War with most clans 

                                Neutral clans : awaiting positionning

                                Contract : open to negociation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Celtiberofrog said:

with Brits unless they make proposal that would include the withdrawal of Louisianna Occidental & Apalache.

 Give you all white oak ports and stay with none? It's your proposal? This is some kind of sick joke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's call this what it really is: 'the return of carebear land'.

Let's cut all the bs and call it as it is:

1) The French want to secure there southern borders and focus on the Sverige threat to the north. Plus Formalise there's alliance with gb! To rake advantage of the new influx of global players looking for a safe pve half of the map.

Why do you lot want half of the entire map to be pve only!!

Congratulations to all the new players from Global who are thinking of rolling Dutch, French, gb your going to NEVER take part in pvp. I hope you enjoy fighting AI! 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Valentine Karrde said:

Just remember, the British are a fractured nation and their diplomats don't speak for everyone in that nation. There will be blood.

Aye, that's why agreements are based on clans not nations. RSC would be willing to perhaps agree to this but cannot speak for other clans. However VLTRA, ARM, SH etc would have to cease their attacks on AHOY, GNF etc for us to agree to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, monk33y said:

Let's call this what it really is: 'the return of carebear land'.

Let's cut all the bs and call it as it is:

1) The French want to secure there southern borders and focus on the Sverige threat to the north. Plus Formalise there's alliance with gb! To rake advantage of the new influx of global players looking for a safe pve half of the map.

Why do you lot want half of the entire map to be pve only!!

Congratulations to all the new players from Global who are thinking of rolling Dutch, French, gb your going to NEVER take part in pvp. I hope you enjoy fighting AI! 

 

I'm kinda not surprised if the GLOBAL former US and GB clans where going to try to pull something like this.  Glad we don't actually have national Alliances.  This should get pretty fun and interesting.

15 minutes ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:

Aye, that's why agreements are based on clans not nations. RSC would be willing to perhaps agree to this but cannot speak for other clans. However VLTRA, ARM, SH etc would have to cease their attacks on AHOY, GNF etc for us to agree to this.

Yah hopefully some of the clans in each nation pretty much do what every they want.  I'll start getting the popcorn ready for the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Teutonic said:

Lol.

"We don't want another mega alliance, so lets propose a mega alliance."

Does the bears of care intend to unite the waring northern clans under a single banner! To purge the world of this deadly illness?

Sverige, Russain, usa, Daines, pirates, Prussians, Polish. What say you lol!!!!

*edit - tongue in cheek 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just explain how realistic this call for a "Southern alliance" is :

Today French helping the Brits in screening Apalachicola PB (attacked by Russian Empire), French tagged some VLTRA that were helping the Russian.

So the ceasefire with EDR is off

(The other French clans must confirm here their neutrality, if they don't the "Real Acuerdo de Indias" will consider a state of war with the whole French faction. precisely what the British are looking for)

Apalachicola_17-12.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, monk33y said:

Does the bears of care intend to unite the waring northern clans under a single banner! To purge the world of this deadly illness?

Sverige, Russain, usa, Daines, pirates, Prussians, Polish. What say you lol!!!!

*edit - tongue in cheek 

@Christendom The King in the North! The King in the North!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...