Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Hawkwood

Ensign
  • Posts

    723
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hawkwood

  1. It´s easy to say "go and steal from others", while those others only have to be on friends list of clans which own those ports where you can get those woods. Double standards.
  2. This can be said over and over and over again. Don't know how often to stress this, the more restrictive the procurement of goods, the less action there will be. Nobody wants to lose ships, after spending hours and hours gathering resources to craft them.
  3. If you craft a crap ship, and want to sink, your calculation is obsolete. Your formula didn´t include the TIME and EFFORT needed to earn the money, which is needed to obtain all the resources and upgrades. To craft Aggy or Wasa you need much more money, woods, iron, coal etc. Means again, you need more TIME to sail around, gathering those, finding those. If i can create a ship, out of nothing,( premium) and don´t have to spend much TIME finding resources, i have an advantage over those which don´t have premium ships. P2W.
  4. It is already, and on its best way to be even worse.Shipcrafting will suffer even more damage, that is for sure.
  5. If someone else had suggested this, few months ago, when you played for russia, then you would probably have refused it.
  6. I don´t know what am i supposed to think about this thread... Make it almost impossible to pass, then give an advice how to make it.. Laugh or cry?
  7. If you hug me you will get boarded, if you sail away you will loose your structure.
  8. I knew I saw something similar but wasn't sure where....
  9. I do, and i am not the only one. Big wipe is on the way, why so serious? Reading small prints is the way to counter those pesky marketing tricks.
  10. You seem to forget, that every time your clan decides to attack a port, a lot of cannonfodder is needed, to secure the safe port battle entry.....
  11. RoE can not be tweaked, rolled back and changed if it´s set once and forever. We the players DO NOT DEFINE how we play the game. We use the possibilities of RoE, and the gaps within RoE some call "exploit". And this is where your post demands "fair play", where you can not expect fair play. RoE needs to define "fair play", not manners, because if you relly on manners, there will be no "fair fight".. Savy?
  12. ROE can and should do everything, it is the meaning of abbreviation "RoE", that is the whole point. You expect "fair" fights? Which fight is fair IF RoE doesn´t determine the rules? “If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.”(John Steinbeck)
  13. When the battle starts, your fleet ships "attack" an enemy, trying to help you. You need to "STOP" their actions first, and THEN give them another command.
  14. Why players aren´t receiving rewards for sinking another players in domestic ports, from Admiralty? Higher the ship BR, higher the reward? (And for sinking an enemy in a DLC ship, you would get the tripple reward..am trying to be funny now..) Instead of hauling some dabbaloons in hold after winning a battle, i would rather loot cannons from an enemy ship. With reward from an Admiralty, cannons, and upgrades.. Loot cannons and upgrades, receive dabbaloons from Admiralty, that would do
  15. Why so serious mate? Was just trying to make a joke
  16. Ok, some might say, the fort did the work..But it ain´t my fault if they tag me in front of the port eh?
  17. Having alliances would increase trade and profits among the traders, and wouldn´t affect PVP at all. It would give traders some kind of security to visit foreign ports of an ally, and boost their tax income. Considering RVR, i could imagine that alliances would increase the amount of PBs, because of joint efforts of allies. Situation we have is, that you can´t relly on anyone and you can´t trust anyone. This isn´t " better for gameplay", it´s just a huge mess and chaos, and with "prolific forger", this chaos became even larger.
  18. @Tom Farseer description is correct. HAVOC wasn´t in GB yet.
×
×
  • Create New...