Andreas Miaoulis Posted February 19, 2015 Share Posted February 19, 2015 I play it on two machines, an Asus N550JK with these specs: Intel i7 4700HQ at 2.4 GHz base and 3.4 GHz turbo. Nvidia GTX 850M with 2GB DDR3 and capability of sharing and additional 2GB RAM from the system. RAM, Kingston Hyper X Impact 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, upgraded from the original 8GB value RAM. WD Black2 for storage. a 1080p screen. my main rig: MB: Asus Sabertooth 990FX CPU: AMD FX 8150 RAM: Kingston Hyper X Fury 16GB DDR3 at 1866MHz GPU: Asus R9 290X DC2OC in CF x2 Kingston Hyper X 240GB SSD and x3 WD Caviar Black 1TB Sound card: Creative SB ZxR with Logitech Z5500 5.1 speakers x3 Samsung 1080p monitors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mage13 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 my specs are: AMD A10 6700k Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 TI (2gb oc edition) 6gb RAM 1TB mechanical hard-drive Runs Naval Action at High:50 FPS (I only play on high) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core Processor 4700 MHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1 I was going to upgrade to this processor and video card. Can you tell me fps on ultra and how many ships in game at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlavDeng2 Posted February 22, 2015 Share Posted February 22, 2015 I was going to upgrade to this processor and video card. Can you tell me fps on ultra and how many ships in game at the time. if you want to upgrade to that processor, might i suggest getting an fx 8350 and overclocking it to that speed since it is the same chip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie_Fox Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 (edited) Processor: i7 860 @ 2.80GHz Os: Win7 64-bit Ram: 16GB GPU: Nvidia GTX 660Ti - Gigabyte c:/ Raid 0 - 1.81TB d:/ Raid 5 - 5.45TB Pow.Sup: Cooler Master B50W Monitor: 55" 3D LED TV resolution: 1920 X 1080 runs just under 60FPS on high 99% of the time Edited February 24, 2015 by Aussie_Fox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elysion Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 Windows 7 i5 3570 (non k, muh virtualization!) 8 gigs of ram gtx 760 SSD I run the game on 'high' settings, because thats what it defaulted to and i saw no reason to change it. I dont know what frame rate it typically runs at because its never started running slow enough that i felt the need to check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fijau Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 i7 4770k @ 4.1GHz 8GB RAM Geforce GTX 970 SSD SATA3 On ultra it gives me usually above 45 fps, even in big battles. Although if I choose highest settings manually, it drops to 30-35 fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BungeeLemming Posted February 23, 2015 Share Posted February 23, 2015 wow.. That PC is quite a beast and you still cant run it over 60 FPS? Whats your monitor resolution? The 970 should be able to deliver more imo. My old 7950 gives me 70+ FPS on custom (all maxxed out.exept of anti aliasing. But on a 1600x1050 monitor) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie_Fox Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 I dont know what frame rate it typically runs at because its never started running slow enough that i felt the need to check. it's at the top of your screen in game. along with ping and other variables Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elysion Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) it's at the top of your screen in game. along with ping and other variables Yeah but its so very far up there in little letters away from the pretty boats =P I looked today. I seemed to be getting around 80 fps. Maybe ill change to the highest settings. EDIT: Wow, changing from high to ultra made my frame rate cut in half. 80to 40 fps. Thats pretty significant for a single step of the quality setting. Edited February 27, 2015 by Elysion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fijau Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 wow.. That PC is quite a beast and you still cant run it over 60 FPS? Whats your monitor resolution? The 970 should be able to deliver more imo. My old 7950 gives me 70+ FPS on custom (all maxxed out.exept of anti aliasing. But on a 1600x1050 monitor) The resolution is 1920x1200. FPS varies from moment to moment. 45 is the lowest I found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K1lbane Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Intel i5 4670K @4.5Ghz Asus Maximus VII Hero 16Gb GSkill Trident X MSI GTX 970 Gaming 4G Crucial 240Gb SSD High : 95 - 105 fps Ultra : 60 - 70 fps Custom : Everything high with NO AA : 100 - 110 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balsafer Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 Intel® Core i5-4430 CPU @ 3.00GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.0GHz NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 8192MB RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipasa Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 (edited) Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 Processor: Intel® Core i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.4GHz Memory: 8192MB RAM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, Dedicated Memory: 1989 MB Pretty "old" configuration by todays standards but gets me solid 50-60fps on any cituation with all setting high EDIT: Resolution 1920 x 1080 Edited March 2, 2015 by tipasa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack_the_Stripper Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 I have a alienware andromeda_R5 Prosser: Intel core i5-2320 3.00GHz Ram: 8.00GB and a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 it's about 2 year old think it's good but gonna get me a new graphic card in the near future What do you think would be best for Naval Action what is the minimum qualifications for a PC to run this game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunde Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 System: CPU i5 - 3.4ghzGPU - Played this game with a GTX 570 for a while, could play it at medium setting no problem. Now however i upgraded to a GTX 970, and can run the game at whatever i want now. Very good investment if you wish you upgrade your rig. Ram - 8gb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack_the_Stripper Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 System: CPU i5 - 3.4ghz GPU - Played this game with a GTX 570 for a while, could play it at medium setting no problem. Now however i upgraded to a GTX 970, and can run the game at whatever i want now. Very good investment if you wish you upgrade your rig. Ram - 8gb ok ya need to get me a new mine is 2 years old still very good but i need the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundagger Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 (edited) Old but my personal build of: Intel Core2Quad 2.67 GHz (easily overclocks on my Abit mobo to 3.2 GHz) Nvidia GTX 650 8Gb ram 2 terabytes HD NA runs smooth as silk on medium settings at 1280x1024 Edited March 3, 2015 by Sundagger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xander Tyrann Posted March 6, 2015 Share Posted March 6, 2015 Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Processor: Intel® Core i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.5GHz Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Memory: 16384MB RAM i run at ultra on 1920 x 1080 and get anything between 50 and 120 fps depending on match size etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJRT Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 It seems that there is a lack of laptops here, Cpu: i7-4710HQ 2.5 Ghz Ram: 16Gb 1600 Mhz Storage: 128 ssd + 1Tb HDD (game is on the HDD) Gpu: GTX 870m 3gb ddr5 Screen: 1920x1080p I run on High at around 45-50 solid fps, if i toggle ultra on the fps fall to 25. Hope this helps JRT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Loe Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 To feel comfortable you must have 3gb of video ram and dx11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majordon Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 I have a laptop,since I am pretty much immobilized at the moment. On low graphic settings the game plays well enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral_Of_The_Fleet Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Processor - Intel Core i7 5960X Eight Core professionally overclocked to 4.2GHzMotherboard - Asus X99 Deluxe, Intel X99 ChipsetCPU Cooler - Corsair H100 hydro cooler with dual SP120 Quiet fansMemory - 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 2666MHz DDR4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie_Fox Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Yeah but its so very far up there in little letters away from the pretty boats =P I looked today. I seemed to be getting around 80 fps. Maybe ill change to the highest settings. EDIT: Wow, changing from high to ultra made my frame rate cut in half. 80to 40 fps. Thats pretty significant for a single step of the quality setting. yeah thats why i will be building a reasonably new pc before the end of the year. with a a lot of the new games(The Division, Star Wars:Battlefront) coming out with big GPU requirements, you have to upgrade or be left behind. To feel comfortable you must have 3gb of video ram and dx11. i feel pretty comfortable with the GTX 660 Ti, and that's only a 2gb card. but as i said above it will be getting long in the tooth by the end of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shavier Posted March 8, 2015 Share Posted March 8, 2015 Intel i5-4690K CPU @ 3,50 GhZ 8,00 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 - 2048 MB Ultra - 50-60 FPS Good, without problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts