Dibbler (Retired)

PvE server is good place to chill out on and fight AI, look around and figure new changes.

New exciting gameplay video of new economy model.

19282 for an oak/oak Essex thats kinda crazy, and without permits lol .

If they did what was suggested by opening post nobody would buy them . I predict there will in time be DLC for all rates, 7th to 1st, and tbh can't see a reason they wouldn't. Current economy model will over time create shortage of RvR capable ships and gaps will need to be filled (DLC). Already are no ships for sale in KPR beyond capped and admiralty shop ones, but guess is still early after econ wipe so will see.

" Just seen few posts over months from guys on PvE who chose hard nation, perhaps something else to consider for PvE server. " But i digress No worries a lot of posts to read as an admin

Ahem..... PvE server........ Just seen posts by a few guys on PvE that chose those nations with no way to capture ports.... means no admiralty. Easiest way to address would be make a port capital for each hard nation on PvE server. Just to clarify again PVE server only lol, changed first post to clarify .

That sounds nice way around things, more economic warfare. Have you also considered adding ports (capital) for "hard" nations on PvE SERVER so new players have access to admiralty? Just seen few posts over months from guys on PvE who chose hard nation, perhaps something else to consider for PvE server.

I'll craft ships just out of stubborness.

May i ask how you access these supply places that take dubloons? Is it a clan thing, as shop only takes reals?

Hercs are total trash now, they have a little more structure than a snow, absolutely no point having one (better to use a surp, reno, cerb that can enter shallows). Yes they were op but now has gone to other extreme, same for all 5th's they are weak now. Tbh if i could i would ask for money back on DLC lol. Wait for these new DLC to hit i bet they totally overpowered for first couple months, I hope i wrong but going on previous form wouldn't surprise me.

Yes me also, Devs neeed cash to keep game going. Now is just matter of balancing ingame so DLC are not all ships people use.

What is this bit about? Freetowns that were already switched?

Spend a few days getting enough for a permit and woods or.... Just buy 3rd rate dlc and kill everyone else every day lol. But hey DLC - Devs like cash. Not for or against but wait and see what result is.

I agree should be about nations, but as we saw in past a time come within every successful endevour the inevitable implosion as more chiefs than indians appear and infighting starts. Last i heard US elect a president etc and thought it sounded quite cool, but people who played as US some found it really annoying. Don't think it is just NA but a fault within humanity and differences between people .

PvE and PvP server Captains meet in port

He's on PvE server as Prussian so Prussia has no ports on there (No RvR to capture ports for hard nations). I would say maybe contact Ink on forum about situation, easiest way on PvE server i guess would be to make a port each as home ports for hard nations maybe.

Just an observation, but why is it the people asking to be rid of smaller nations don't seem to ever include their own. Odd that

Yes they replaced the old way, but man finding national fleets was such a pain lol. Maybe would be different now that AI routes been changed though. @Capt Aerobane Good idea's though in general

What you are describing is how hostility used to be raised by attacking that nations ships/fleets. It was such a pain in the micheal jackson's preferred action, that they introduced hostility missions.... round and round we go .

Now this is cool, and worthy of posting for .

Guess the safest way from now going forward is to just not use global and nation chat. I do think a permaban is a bit harsh but hey rules are rulkes i guess. I had better stop posting here just in case .

I play on the PvP server but I suspect that there would be a number of players on PvE that would take an option that you seem to have overlooked, and go play something else perhaps. Lets face it the boost in server pop from global/EU merge was short lived and they were both PvP servers. Also how many minutes do you think it would be with your suggestion until some started a campaign to enter the PvE area as they do now with rienforcement zones? Good idea on paper but PvE and PvP people tend to be at the opposite ends of gaming thought and opinion in my experience, although perhaps i could be wrong i guess.

Thats fair enough in my humble opinion, Good show sir .

Looks nice