Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

monk33y

Ensign
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,348

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by monk33y

  1. monk33y
    Skully would you like to join me on my window liicking marathon?
  2. monk33y
    What proof do you have skully?? All I can see is nonsense!!!
  3. monk33y
    If I say I'm the real Donald trump do I get my own tribunal section too??? Question is the average IQ of national players really getting this new depth of stupid!!? Best thing iv read in ages
  4. monk33y
    1) national missions to drive conquest! 2) port battle revenge gankfest fix. Both parts get the chance to teleport back to capital, with ship only being available after server down time. Crew is lost amd must be re-purchases once at capital. 3) raiding -old flag system. Generates no hostility but costs 1000 combat marks etc. Gives, blueprints/ships/ resources or money. If defended defender gets a large regional buff etc...
  5. monk33y
    Like Norfolk stated. Having a record of the conquest on our servers could be used by the development team on big patches and wipes to show the last ages conquest information. Imagine our server map, slowly changing as the months go past, showing the hot spots of ships sunk on the loading screen while we are waiting to get in game... I think it would be epic!
  6. monk33y
    I understand where the author is coming from BUT we had a rookie zone that was hardly used. Open world sailing takes a long time but there are rewards etc. Game is beautiful for one! I know most players would hate this but I wish hostile AI fleets would attack you (AI engaging tags) in open world. So this complaint over boring long sails would go away forever and instead be replaced with stop hostile AI tagging complaints!
  7. monk33y
    Can't wait to see you guys develop this concept more. Any snip bits of information available?
  8. monk33y
    It would be nice to get a log of events for each server! We the community have developed a history through conflict, many epic ages! We have had a number of powerful nations and clans but currently any new player comes into the game with a blank history. The letter to the king did this very well. It's a shame it's only for global. I'd like to see a moderator given responsibility for keeping a locked thread showing weekly changes to conquest and the top three hot spots for combat over that week (ships lost etc), (busiest trade hubs) and (most missions run here) I think Norfolk would do an amazing job (with help) managering this log book of our collective history's.
  9. monk33y
    We are all very much aware that roe is broken, revenge ganking etc. Could we not introduce into the admiralty store/pirate den a "chest of flags". The chest of flags is basically a chest of different nations flags, enabling players that are grouped up to display any nations flag to interrupt any attempt at tagging or being pulled into combat via an AI tag. Each "chest of flags" is a single use item that are stackable. Works on the same idea as hull/rig repairs. Item weight to be astablished at a later point. The chest of flags is designed to give the chance for the captain to interrupt a player made tag. In the simplest use of this item, when the tag is counting down each player of a party must right click on there "chest of flags" to interrupt the tag. All members of a party must each use the "chest of flags" to interrupt the tag otherwise they are pulled into battle like normal. Once a chest of flags is enabled the user is protected from being attackable for 90 seconds! (again only works against lesser br attackers or AI tags) "Chest of flags" only works in groups say min 5 people. "Chest of flags" can only be used to interrupt a tag from an enermy with less br. Or when AI is attacked and you are pulled in through the stupid roe range. Any attacker with equal or higher br, the "chest of flags" has no use. The "chest of flags" will cost *edit after pm* only 10 combat marks each! Open to extra ideas and suggestions.
  10. monk33y
    The British won't fight anybody until they can allie up with which two nations are the strongest. Then and only then will we see the "mighty" proud British banging the war drums!!
  11. monk33y
    When you have played pirate for 5+ months. You can't join another nation. We went British to get pvp, which we enjoyed. The only problem with this game now is every nation is allied again... I just don't understand how nationals can have fun never attacking anyone! Mabey that's why alot of brits are turning to the black...
  12. monk33y
    I love it when the zerg gets put into the convo. Pirates is nothing like the safe, friendly (boring) world that nations hide inside of. Pirate clans are effectively mini nations, we have own set of rules and collective desires. With pirates being able to attack each other the clans are under a single banner (pirate) but are independent. Pirates have well documented rogue clans that are on kos for most of the bigger clans. It's not like being part of gb where a rogue clan is only considered rogue because they don't play how the councils demand. I have always considered clans more like companies instead of clans. We sail under a single banner for our nation but we are independent. Pirate is probably the most open, non restricted way of playing naval action. [SORRY] is growing day by day, we appeal to players who want pvp, rvr etc without all the bs councils set up and control. Sorry is soon to have three 25 man first rate fleets. Sorry may be getting close to a zerg in size but we are still working towards single goals. Sorry has been active for a long time. The pirates are coming! The pirates of sorry are coming! The pirates of gaff are coming! The pirates of planb are coming! We now have ten, 30+ member active clans in the pirate nation working together. Our time is coming! The sun will be setting shortly, the black is coming...
  13. monk33y
    Hang on a second!! When the brits were the servers super power you shoved your "mighty" fleets down our throats. You strangled the server to fit your will! Now the "mighty" British are a footnote in history. It must be embarrassing to play Great Britain when you have over 400+ active members of the nation but struggle to generate more hostility than the usa who has like 50players!!! The days of seeing the map all red are coming to an end. The days of Yellow/green/blue and black is coming!!
  14. monk33y
    If a nation wins a port battle they should be granted safe harbour until port changes hands on reset. Or a free teleport (with ship) to capital
  15. monk33y
    Too much peace. For the love of donuts please don't let our server fall back to hand holding of ages gone by!!! The future of our server hangs on the ballance!! I feel we require a aggression marker for the eu server. For new players who join (hopefully), so they can pick a nation to match there play style. Pirates - very aggressive. British - passive, pve players.. Dutch - super passive Sweeds - semi aggressive. Daines - mostly aggressive. Usa- passive (more aggressive that gb) French - passive Spain - semi aggressive (split down middle between war and pve)
  16. monk33y
    I know its hard to see what's going on in our little world from inside kpr greenzone but you may have not seen us defend our Spanish allies against the sweeds. Props to the sweeds they would fight back, mabey the sweeds have all the old British pvpers! Currently we are holding the Danes at bay. Our pubbies are having fun fighting the mighty usa and it's 25 players. Hasn't the 25 usa players generated more pbs than the "mighty" British??
  17. monk33y
    What colour have you picked for your carebear alliance this time! Blue or purple??
  18. monk33y
    Come on monkey join the big boy table where we put down our crayons and colouring books and pick up our inflatable swords. Considering the "mighty" British are struggling to farm hostility in Spanish waters full of fleets, I guess the British council has signed your beloved pve charter again. I believe we pirates saw a glimpse of it. I think it was titled "WE DONT FIGHT BATTLES SO WE CAN NEvER LOOSE" I'm also shocked that the gb Spanish war has stopped nope gb refuse to fight.... Shame
  19. monk33y
    It's a shame that the pirates seem to be the only nation fighting at the moment. I honestly don't understand how you nations don't get bored being friends with everyone else! British are back to being carebears. Usa, back to the good old days where seeing a usa player will bring you luck and good fortune. Danes - got fire in there belly, we like that. Sweeds seems to have become the Danish puppet nation. French -who cares Dutch- who cares Spain- stirring again. Join the fight boys!
  20. monk33y
    Lol, I find that very hard to believe as the two nations with "no agreements" sailed side by side. I didn't see a single gb, sweed battle that day... Typical British....
  21. monk33y
    Your idea is a good one. We have the same issues on eu (again). Most nations are allied or at the very least signed up to non aggression. Yesterday we watched 6 brits+ 5 Danes and 3 sweeds sail together up to the deadline chest. No1 did anything apart from hold hands. I still feel 1 teleport a day per account is a better solution tho. You can teleport to any outpost or freeport but only once.
  22. monk33y
    I think you mean salamander and cartagena was a SHAM! I wish we had a fleet commander addons available in game through the nation shop that showed a fleet commander allowing a full 25 man fleet costing 1k combat marks. Meaning main port fleet could get to battle or defenders would need to also use port commander flags also costing same 1k marks enabling a fleet with 2/3 rds br could tag. So screening could happen. I'd make the fleet commander only able to activate the fleet say 750 metres from port battles crosses. Still giving screening a chance
  23. monk33y
    **EDIT** I received a warning in the past for doing the same thing the above post is doing.. Where is the consistency of moderation??? Back on subject! As I'm being accused of cheating. I have the right to reply to this under your own Forum guidelines. Screening is part of the game, not being able to make it to a port, has happened many times before! Correct or not? The so called proof above only shows Danish characters pulling players into a pve/pvp instance. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL SHOWN here that myself or any other pirate has committed any breach of rules! Again there is NO EVIDENCE that land party has done any wrong apart from the Danish players who tagged AI!! **Edit2** If your going to pick on the way I construct sentences it may be down the fact I'm extremely dyslexic. Where on my most do I admit to doing anything, apart from screening? Your accusing pirates regarding the port battle for cap Francis a pirate held port! The fact that I mentioned that someone dragged you into a battles is a statement of fact (hence the tribunal topic) Edit: Edited out rule breaking points. - Moderator Team
  24. monk33y
    Lol don't play the stupid card. The who of who, screening for who says alot about a nation
  25. monk33y
    Well let's look at the situation on the eu server. After 1 month (ish) from the get wipe, we have the following situation: Allies =gb/Dutch/Danes/sweeds Allies= pirates/Spain/USA Non aggression = between gb/Dutch/France/sweeds/USA/Danes... Unless outposts in freeports re-apear we are heading to a stalemate again. Only open region for attack is salamlanker (spelt wrong I know) between gb and Spain and that port is a bugger to attack with the new gb/Danes invented tactic of tagging AI to stop the attacker getting to port!!! Freeports give a new area to conquest. If you want your ships there u must sail it there you as the captain can only teleport...
×
×
  • Create New...