monk33y

I think the scores should reset otherwise the winning nations will be unstoppable. It should be set that the nation who wins cycle one, is heavily unlikely to win cycle two!!! If for example the sweeds win cycle one with 20 ports, the scores should be reset, meaning the sweeds would be at a disadvantage for cycle two!!! Not this rubbish scores continue so the two or three top nations are uncatchable

If we want a ballanced game, either the Cooldown on successful defence is needed or increased to match the Cooldown on a capture. As a pirate on eu, next week we'll have only Mt. No chance of ever taking back the shallows. We will just evolve and become the pirates we should be. Last night we were told that the British are considering agreeing to fix which nation wins in certain cycles, if the Danes/sweeds agree!! That should never be allowed to happen!! I'm not suprised that the brits want to play without fighting!

I think the conquest cycle should be, two weeks fighting then finish, and one week rest.

As we are all very much aware, the new victory mark system benefits the strongest nations. Shock horror there right! I propose that any nation pushed back to a single port/region OR comes bottom of the conquest table gets a 100% point buff when capturing regions for one week. Please stop punishing smaller nations and rewarding the powerful.

I love how leaked information from the British gets the British up in arms defending their "honor" ....... Strange that. ..........

The pirates already see the writing on the wall. The new victory points have hello kittyed over the pirates. When gb or Sweden win the first and second weeks and can build the heavy rattlesnake, the ability to defend the shallow ports will be ripped away. The pirates are very much aware that being one ported is only a few weeks away. We will evolve, we will adjust. I just for the love of God, hope that the whispers of gb/sweeds/Danes agreeing to switch ports to share victory points is not true!!

your informarion on sorry is a liitle out of date...............

I think there is already a working system for safe gameplay at your capital and surrounding ports... It's called the pve server!

I guess the easiest way to make captured flags have a lifespan. Say a captured flag is only valid for 5 server resets. More than enough time to get resources, Contracts etc and escape. The captured flag system would mean being a famous pirate would have drawbacks. And forces players to pay attention to open world more. Oh There are two Dutch players moving towards me fast... Oh what they are attacking me... What they are pirates.... I knew I shouldn't have sailed this victory alone for missions!!! **edit ** The bigger the ship, the longer the flag lasts. 5th rate and below= flag until restart of server. 4th+ 3Rd rate = 3 days. 2nd+01St rate = 5 days...

Pirates in my opinion should be used as a server balancing factor. Pirates should not be able to capture regions but instead they capture ports. The whole 4th rate idea is only valid while the nations don't have a surplus of bigger ships. Raiding should be pirate only.... For me the biggest feature missing for pirates is being able to presume the identity of a national in a ship captured from a national player. Any pirate who captures any ship in pvp from a national should be able to sail that nations flag I'm open world, to equip the national flag the pirate must first be in any freeport or pirate port. Sailing under a nationals flag would grant access to the national port, Contracts and resources buildings. (for a pirate to move goods out of the port they must use a ship with the nations flag). Being able as a pirate to sail under any nations flag opens up the game and removes the need for pirates to capture regions. Any non pirate can still attack a pirate using there flag, but the option is only available when the player has been clicked on (circle highlighted). Simple system to make pirates unique

Gentleman remember tribunal is only for: Accuser Defender Accuser must provide proof/EVIDENCE (not hearsay) Defender can provide defending material where needed. (if you want to argue and flame go to national chat- global)

It's his thread guys

If you don't like what someone says in there own recruitment thread DONT ENTER IT AND READ THE POSTS!!

Get out the the recruitment thread ffs. If you don't like what's said leave the thread you miserable cretin!!

I wouldn't really call the game about nation v nation. The rvr is the worst it has been in ages. Port battles are a joke to get into, I wish we had the old flag system for indervidual ports... But I'm an old pirate

I just love how some players actually believe the hype surrounding sorry. On your alts being banned rubbish, I don't know of a single sorry member who has had a single alt banned! On the fact that you actually think the capture of ayes against the usa and the defeat to the Danes at cap Francis are the same thing just shows how stupid you are. I suggest you compare the fleet composition for both port battles, look at what ships the usa defended with and compare that to the fleet of the Danes. Also if you think the Danes and the usa captains are anywhere near on the same skill and experience shows you must struggle to walk past a window without licking it....! (i know old habits die hard) On the port capture look up which ships attacked the Spanish port, as you have already proven that reading is a struggle. Rubi and sorry are different words!!!

Chain one target while pulling the other away. Then go bk and stern camp the other!

I totally understand ultra's choice to go Dane/British. While part of Spain they were hated by other Spanish clans, the same clans who refused to get off there arses and protect the nation. But the same clans who expected ultra to share ships and conquest marks for the good of the nation. The pirates have the same problem. Those who fight are hated, those who do piss all demand ships,marks etc for the good of the nation. Ultra are a good group of pvpers, is it any wonder that they went to a nation(s) who respect skill when they see it. **on a side note, the pirate agreements with Spain were on the grounds that ultra were involved. No ultra no agreement! May be worth getting confirmation then updating info

Were you no of the simpletons who boycotted the game when you lost a pb. If so I wish you never loose again. The game can't take another mass quitting

As I was only coming online this morning before work to craft. I'd rather like one labour contract

You see my point tho!

I think the conversation should go something along the lines of "who would you rather have attacking you, brits or pirates?" Do you turn your back on the pirates when they "mostly" refrained from attacking your ports or do you ally with a nation that has consistently attacked Spanish ports!! Either way the new spanish council is in a tricky position.

I predict that the new Spanish council declares non aggression with the British/danes/Dutch/French/sweeds/USA

And you call me a troll.....

..... I SAID GROUP pvp!!!! Port battles etc. Christ are you five years old!!!!