Reverendo Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 I think it would be interesting to merge ships with identical characteristics. So if you have 2 Consitution-Fir/Build Strength/Speed/2/5 for example. Each with 1 duras, you could merge them and end with one ship with 2 Duras. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlavDeng2 Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Personally im against any way of recovering durabilities. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jw62 Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 I'm with Olav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Dryfus Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Im with Olav as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grundal Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 w/ Olav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hethwill Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Likewise, supporting no merge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Personally I think very much the opposite. Ships in that era decayed very quickly. So I would like to see our ships gradually decay over time and more so through battle damage. Repairs to ships currently bring them back to 100% - but I would have expected ships seeing damage multiple times to gradually become economically unviable to repair as the extensive fixes scale in cost. Having something like this in the game would give a more finite life to each ship - and push players to constantly keep working to maintain a fleet of ships. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimera Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Like the Systems as it is. No merge, no decay, no 1-dura ships needed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admin Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 mystic forge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledinis Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 ... And here i am drawing pentagrams, pleading to the gods, old and new to remove durabilities in general... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromey Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 (edited) well merging ships is a good counter argument against aging. Game will get weird if we got to start tearing 2 old ships in half to make into 1 semi new one. Great post tho. Edited July 21, 2016 by Chromey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samurai__ Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 well merging ships is a good counter argument against aging. Game will get weird if we got to start tearing 2 old ships in half to make into 1 semi new one. Great post tho. 17th centaury Cut and Shut No Thanks to merge or aging... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sire Trinkof Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 More hoping for 1 durability ships, and hability to buy the hull back after it is captured (not sunk) ,for an enormous price, modified deeply by the perm upgrade on it, for PVE... and for PVP : let the guy capturing the ship offer a ransom price to the defeated player to give the ship back So : merging durability .... No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kronans Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 w/ Olav Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastidius Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 im against duros on anything 6th and up. it is bad design and hurtful to the crating/economy. 1 duro, losing permanents but keeping normal upgrades is far more preferable IMO. Once the figure out the surrender issue it will be far more likely a ship is captured rather than sunk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reverendo Posted July 25, 2016 Author Share Posted July 25, 2016 mystic forge The same mystic forge that permits a ship sunk 5 times! Anyway I can see that people think that is a bad idea. Dump it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now