Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Cpt Eole

Members
  • Content Count

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

25 Excellent

About Cpt Eole

  • Rank
    Landsmen

Profile Information

  • Location
    France

Recent Profile Visitors

219 profile views
  1. This mechanism would be an opportunity for the pirate nation to really make sense. Pirates should be affected in another way by this mechanism. They should be able to fight on any side without taking a karma malus. On the other hand, they would never be able to benefit from the infrastructure of other nations' ports. Conversely, other nations should be able to join any side of a battle started against a pirate player without any karma malus against pirate nation. This could be justified either by some kind of pirate hunt by nations to make the waters safer, if one goes back against the pirate. And if you go back to the pirate's side it could be considered as if you were hiring the pirate player and then you get a bigger karma malus to the nation you are fighting agaisnt.
  2. Cpt Eole

    Is it allowed?

    Or his clan will soon become really poor
  3. The point is, I think, that he shot during the "pulling phase" and not during boarding stricktly speaking. But it still doesn't look like a bug to me as the crew calculation is made before boarding phase. I have a question about this situation, will it reduce crew moral as crew was killed before boarding ? He's crew moral seems still pristine to me.
  4. Yes it is. So no reward except usual ones. If you tag a player in a bigger ship, will it be patrol battle ? I know it works that way with AI, but is it the same if you tag players ?
  5. Salut, Ta situation semble bien différente de celle d'Aramis. Si je comprends bien, c'est ton allier qui te taunt et pas un adversaire à qui tu refuses le combat. Je suis bien désolé que de tels comportements existent dans la nation France, il ne sont pas représentatifs de la majorité des joueurs je suis sûr. Vise les plus petits clans (ou ceux sans égo surdimensionnés) si tu cherches à éviter les énergumènes de ce genre. Le jeu reste plus agréable en groupe si tu n'es pas un grand adepte de la chasse solo.
  6. Ahoy, National/clan diplomacy is a mess for players to be aware of last news. I think adding a chatbox or a window available for every player in a nation where each clan can announce shortly about his diplomacy or recruitement policy. I think it could be added next to clan ranking window. It could benefit new players to find a clan, players being more aware of diplomacy and also to mobilize all players from a nation for specific events if announced. If you have other ideas,
  7. Yes probably for the dream team RvR roaster of the alliance it will bring more , but not for casual players. They will screen for the PB fleet as they propably already do now. And when i'm talking about that alliances will last forever, I'm referring to the Sweedish / British alliance which came to an end because of OW pvp matters. That would never had happened with alliance system. Treason and misunderstandings are part of the game especially between different nations.
  8. I think preventing player to attack each others is not a good think in a nation wargame. Alliances would last forever and will bring less content to the game. An annoucement chatbox could be added for each nation. One announcement per clan with limited lettering. So every nation's player could be aware of what clan has decided about diplomacy or recruitements policy and other important stuff.
  9. Le problème est que le raisonnement est mauvais dès le départ, ce n'est pas à nous de démontrer notre amabilité pour que tu veuilles bien combattre en patrol. C'est à toi de te battre et après/en même temps évoquer les problèmes avec les NN si tu veux. Essaie dans ce sens et tu verras que ce sera de 1, plus sympa pour tout le monde, et de 2, la discussion sera beaucoup plus ouverte de notre côté (aucune insulte ou troll).
  10. Salut Aramis, Me sentant un chouia concerné par ton post, je vais te répondre au risque de me répéter. Il n'y a pas de "jouer à taper dedans" ou non, si tu vas en patrol, tu y vas pour te battre. C'est le principe même de cette zone. Tu sais pertinemment que tu peux tomber sur n'importe qui à n'importe quel moment. Tu ne choisis pas ou très peu tes combats. Par ailleurs, ta première réaction en nous voyant est de fuir le combat et ce avant que tout troll commence. J'ai cherché à comprendre, te faire changer d'avis et ce de manière polie. Ta seule explication a été de dire que les NN ont été méchant avec toi il y a quelques mois et notamment deux d'entre nous, qui, bien sûr, n'étaient pas présents dans cette bataille. On ne s'était jamais croisé ou alors ça n'a marqué ni Macu ni moi, ce qui veut bien dire qu'il n'y a eu aucun accrochage avant avec nous (on a une bonne mémoire pour ce genre de choses). C'est quel niveau de réflexion de vouloir faire payer des joueurs pour le seul motif qu'ils appartiennent au même clan ? Quand on essaie de dialoguer et de comprendre et que la seule réponse est "mais euh vos copains ont été méchants avec moi" forcément on fini par avoir envie de troller un peu. Rien de méchant. Comme tes screen l'attestent, aucune insulte. Tant qu'on est dans les anciens dossiers et les généralisations, je crois que les Fr sont largement devant nous dans ce domaine, j'en veux pour preuve les ban chat de certains de vos éminents membre il y a quelques temps. Alors qu'aucun NN n'a subi de telle sanction. Edit: J'ai même des screen datant d'une ou deux semaine où je me fais insulter gratuitement par un Fr. Si tu veux nous éviter, va en OW et chasse loin des russes. J'ai entendu dire que vous étiez bien occupés dans le sud des Antilles par exemple. Ps: Se galvaniser d'avoir fui pendant 20 minutes un combat alors qu'on est sur le jeu pour se "détendre et être de bonne humeur", je ne suis pas sûr que tu ais bien compris le principe de NA. Et si c'est amené à se reproduire, fais toi couler, tu perdras moins de temps qu'en courant.
  11. o7 Yesterday I boarded a player outside the circle in patrol zone battle to prevent him to go back in. Thought it was a smart moove as i left the circle few seconds later than him. But when the 5 mins countdown went over he got killed, but no message on the chat. then 20 secs later my turn to get killed. We were still in boarding after his death and also mine. I had to kill all his crew to free me. So our 2 ships sank and in the kill chat it said that i killed a dane player and a russian player (i think it correspond with my ship). Is that a normal feature and i have to disengage boarding before time is over ? Or is that a kind of bug ? I did a f11 report.
  12. I think we have an answer here. The ship's BR is lowered only if a low rank can't fully fill the crew.
  13. Not that much. Indeed you have a wave of players playing it just after the release of the ship. Hercule was the only ship used in SC patrol zone at the begining. Now there's plenty of surprise or (less) La Renommée. You don't see much Rattvisan on the sea execpt in patrol zone or in screening. And i think theses areas would be much more empty without this kind of dlc ships. Each ship has its meta time. The trincomalee was overused for a long time as wasa not so far. It's more depending on the meta and ship balance than whether the boat is chargeable and redeemable everyday or not except for some specific uses (where most of players wouldn't do if they could loose a valuable ship).
  14. If you use the gun damage pm, ships with carronades will have higher BR than navy guns. The gun choice is almost only a matter of playstyle and should not be use to calculate BR i think. Same as the choice of wood which also depends on playstyle. If added later, the crew experience could modulate the BR.
  15. Even if you have more crew available because of your rank and you could fullfill it outside the battle in OW ? For example I'm Admiral, i have 1.500 crew available but sail an ocean only 90% crew, i.e 990 crew. Still have 510 crew available.
×
×
  • Create New...