Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Koveras

Members2
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    153

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Koveras

  1. Koveras
    51515151
  2. Koveras
    Edited the clan description.
  3. Koveras
    I'd actually like to thank you. I love the ship!
  4. Koveras
    +1
  5. Koveras
    A better solution would be to make the shipyard, not the port the pointcarrier, which would increase diversity, competition and make for a better balance overall. And we'd be solving a lot of other problems in regards to alt clans as well.
  6. Koveras
    Stats are faulty. NPC raid on Truxillo was defended by the best PvE'ers in the game.
  7. Koveras
    It won't help. The strong are stronger because of better equipment and larger numbers. The current system of port bonus' and strategic mods (with no other way to get strategic ressources than through alts/nation swapping) just ensures that the strong will stay strong and the rest. Well - when's the last time we saw a PB between two evenly matched nations? Sweden is cherry-bashing on GB. Russia is borsjt-smashing the dutch. No low-pop nations do RvR anymore and can any1 really blame them? Prussia is the exception, but they basically got 1 organized clan and more importantly they have access to two 55p ports. You won't see a different result by giving more time to plan - numbers on the stronger side will still be larger. EDIT: My point eluded my typing...
  8. Koveras
    It would be easier to see what nation Lars Kjaer plays if he could actually write in the forums. Lars has never played a strong nation tho, nor a strong clan. Someone has to be the underdog - the wins are grander, the losses more natural.
  9. Koveras
    I think this would be easier if the clans, not the server, decided which ports were 55p ports, in short made it dependent on investments. I'd still argue for the bonus' to be tied to the shipyard/crafter to allow greater diversity of ships/crafters as well as something to grind for when you're the richest man on the server(s).
  10. Koveras
    oh....
  11. Koveras
    Let's be honest. NPC PBs is a means to drive up player numbers since it forces clans to be online whenever a raid occurs. It's a feature. It doesn't have to be a good feature. As to the use of an alt clan, I couldn't imagine anyone being rude enough to do that!! ________________________________________________________________________________ Remove PBs and let the individual crafter grind his shipyard, let the portinvestments be about ressources and let everyone harvest at all national ports. Ownership would then be about taxes - and farms should provide tax as well. Remove the NPC PBs from the war-server, we do PvP not PvE.
  12. Koveras
    Clan BOCAR was trying to assist a small russian clan get their first port, a first tentative step into the larger world of RvR.. Shame we were resisted in the end!
  13. Koveras
    Wasn't there something about a host mission being interrupted?
  14. Koveras
    I apologize if I may have offended any PvE nations and will henceforth leave my forum PvP'ing for the national news section!
  15. Koveras
    Why? Any port captured by the AI should be reduced to zero investment as a punishment to the PvE nation that apparently can't PvE...
  16. Koveras
    This is not national news. Please refrain from debasing your fellow captain.
  17. Koveras
    tbh I believe it's more the risk of losing crafting ports that prevents ppl from doing RvR. RvR is great when you're winning and taking stuff from other people, it's crap when you're losing access to you shipyard facilities, port bonus', rare ressources etc. That and the currently inbuildt uncompetitiveness of some ressources/PBs simply makes some clans/nations unable to compete i RvR and thus unwilling to waste the time/effort in doing it. PvP is simpler, cleaner and much more fun - take a ship, kill or get killed and neither party is really worse for wear after the battle.
  18. Koveras
    I would rather pour gasoline over my ships than ever help a swede in RvR regardless of what is "hardcoded" into the game.
  19. Koveras
    They tell me that every player on NA is in actuality a pinata that wants to burn, burn, BURN!
  20. Koveras
    You mean the inferiors? The whispers tell me that we have an alt clan in Denmark-Norway that work on the behest of the dutch/swedish alliance to pacify the Danish-Norwegian vikings! Can we burn them?
  21. Koveras
    From what I hear it is sorely needed, apparently people don't like being called irrelevant... Who knew, huh?
  22. Koveras
    My Norwegian fudgebunny is coming home!!!! Oh I can't wait to violate you, my sweet, sweet norwegian whisper... tell me how naughty I am!! Straf mig!
  23. Koveras
    +1
  24. Koveras
    PL is an impossible nation. What is the problem in an impossible nation being impossible to play? Russia is viable ingame - why? Playerbase. Prussia is reasonably viable ingame - why? Playerbase Poland-Lithuania is not viable ingame - why? Lack of playerbase. Kill it off and let's end this futile debate, impossible nations was introduced as impossible for a reason. Everyone knows I resented the addition of the cartoon nations but now they are here I can't see why PL or any other impossible nation should get a reservation. It's an impossible nation, play it like it is.
  25. Koveras
    The US can't "come back" as a major player in RvR..
×
×
  • Create New...