Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Cmdr RideZ

Members
  • Content Count

    1,667
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

936 Excellent

About Cmdr RideZ

  • Rank
    Commander

Recent Profile Visitors

1,971 profile views
  1. Now there is plenty of PvP? If there were plenty of PvP you would be asking repair kit patch. admin tried to have similar system for crew as there is now for repair kits. Many players on this forum told that they don't want to be sailing back to port all the time, "bound to port". Now you can still teleport crew to your ship, but if these PvP players had not been there I can promise that you would sail back to port to get more crew after every single fight. Everyone on this forum can defend the game and tell how good it is. The game is dying, maybe time to think why and not just deny
  2. Pretty much this. Would not be even surprised if they just let the game die. admin had "trusted" friends whose opinion he was listening. This was probably the biggest mistake as he was listening wrong people. When they started these radical changes, I think there were some people here on forum telling them to not ruin the game. They did not listen them, it felt almost like admin went in "block" mode and did not receive any input. If there is something to save here it is going to be done with action oriented game.
  3. They might actually get a game that is not dead. So whats your problem?
  4. Have been watching steam charts and slowly decreasing player numbers. 24-peak today 850, the last Sunday under 1000 players, Last 30 days 1097. Maybe time to get back to 2016 and give us another server called "Naval Action Classic". That more PvP oriented game so many of us wanted? Version to look would be the one before tournament. Of course this version would still need many obvious fixes done after. There are also changes that you have done that were already asked in 2016 but implemented years after. Also decrease amount of grind, easier economy, crew costs were insane this
  5. It was tested already. None crafted ships, stores were empty, nothing to buy. They have to make the economy to work before they can remove RNG.
  6. Can work without RNG but not if the economy is not changed.
  7. Well said Sir, well said. They cry only because they don't have. Once they get their new shiny muskets it is all l2p and gear does not matter.
  8. Everyone knows RNG is a bad fix but the economy does not work without it. Suggest ways to motivate people to craft ships without RNG? Everyone has their max craft XP. Everything is very expensive, none wants to lose ships. Sailing a trader is boring as hell, everyone do bare minimum to craft their own ship. Ship trade done in Doubloons. Decrease taxes for player driven economy. We are directors and AI sails our traders. If our trader gets captured by player we can see the name of the captain. Let us set bounties on their heads. Let us know where the sh
  9. Ships are expensive, none dares to lose ships. Turns out we then don't have enough PvP. People don't need many ships. Economy has hard time. RNG is a fix to create a need to craft, make veteran players to craft more ships, support player driven economy.
  10. In the end it does not matter what is the system. Just make it balanced and support competitive PvP. I am also dead tired to read when nubs with +10000% damage come to explain how gear does not matter.
  11. I am not playing as much as before and not too many new players. I can be wrong in this. 1. They can learn but it may need time to understand that from how far they can shoot. You may think you are bad when bot hits 50% and you miss all. Eventually they sure learn to get closer, at least when someone tells to them that they are too far. 2. They get focused at aiming that don't look where they sail, don't understand they sailed their ship directly upwind. New physics help here as they will eventually reverse. Cannot remember was there a tacking tutorial, if not, I don't think it could
  12. This is difficult as you know already how the game works. It is very hard to make yourself to learn and try new ways to fail. Here are some I know people had issues with. 1. They start firing from long distance. Flat ships that are hard to hit between waves. Bots are accurate, decrease accuracy even more for 6-7th rate missions? Bots also snipe your stern from long distance, they could start sailing towards you sooner. 2. They don't follow wind and soon in irons. They don't know how to use manual sails and bot is wrecking their ship. Was this in tutorial? 3. They sail too s
  13. I have all the best boarding upgrades, I win. Boarding is not about gear, it is about skill. Devs introduce Insane Muskets, I lose. Boarding is about gear and not from skill. I cry because those are Insane. I got Insane Muskets from a loot chest, I win. Boarding is once again about skill, l2p nubs! World is once again in balance for Veteran Naval Action gankers.
  14. When the current upgrades, gear, came out I think I might have said even day one that it sucks. Right now the game is gear based. It is actually sad that players don't understand this already. From your first post I can see that at least you know something. Remember also that we now speak only from speed, there are other pieces of gear that are simply stupid as well. You explain that make faster ship to come to you. Well what if the faster ship is also more combat oriented or like many say "tankier" than your ship? You tell to use smaller and faster ship to ca
  15. Am I blind or no sticky thread for gear feedback? Modules, Books, Perks, Wood Types, Cannons, etc. ? Wanted to post to that thread: There is going to be an upgrade patch, hopefully more like overhaul, as things are that bad. Wood Types are broken. With a rare upgrade or 2 you can swap Wood Types. Something like from Fir to Teak or LO/WO to T/WO ? Penalties of these lighter and heavier wood types are still there. Upgrades should have smaller bonuses and or higher penalties, when compared to wood type stats. Fir vs Teak: Teak with rare speed upgrades should n
×
×
  • Create New...