Poryv

Thanks for replay mr @Ink, i will do as you advised. But can my attachements be cleared/deleted, maybe by you? The problem is, that no preview is shown, if i post any link.

VCO is European night time folks, aren't they?

Not Russia is in need of a nerf, but you all need to get better! Speak with each other, organize, train, help each other get better, do anything but stop whining about russia. You want to train in a balanced pvp battle? Let me introduce you this: https://forum.game-labs.net/topic/30756-weekly-frigate-tournament/?tab=comments#comment-661134

Sory for the question, maybe i am to dump. If i go here i dont see any option to delete those attachements. I do a lot of memes, my space is quickly used up

Hey guys, lets have balanced frigate battles! Lets do: https://forum.game-labs.net/topic/30756-weekly-frigate-tournament/?tab=comments#comment-661134

my game never crashes, dont have any connection problems.

да ладно чё ты, не переживай

They had a second hostility battle, where sweds also jumped in and sunk a lot. Thats what i hear from what they say in stream

Oft sind die Leute sehr schnell dort, nehmen ihre schnellsten Trader und segeln los

-

To all the captains, who dont want to fight RVR but want big and equal battles:

-

Captains! Lets arrange frigate battles in open world! Why? Everyone needs training. Everyone likes big battles. Lineships are expensive, frigates not Why arrange? Because gank- and patrol battles are mostly uneven. In arranged frigate battles we can agree on equal numbers. How does it work? As a clan, write as an answer, how many you want bring from your friends and what time in the week is best for you. After a while we will see a list of willing competitors. Who arranges? Either people see and arrange battles with each other or i write them all the instructions, where to meet, what to bring and so on. You want to discuss? please do it here and not in this thread

How they fight a zerg

Thats why GB changed Salamanca and Belize timer from 11-14 in the week days to 5-8 last weekend. My respect for GB went from WOW after Salamanca battles to LOW since your timer game.

European Danish clan Heavn hidig behind 11-14 timers. Shame!

no unfounded "Nation A want destroy Nation B" accusations less empty portbattles and boredom statements of participiants don´t get lost in other forum threads less players leave game/nation to early or at all, because they think they are doomed bigger propability that a loosing nation can recover more clearity about who is with whom clarity about everything and less forum drama and bullshit

My suggestions is also not for RP purposes. Its all about clans communicating, what their goals are before starting a war campaign.

I think you do not understand: I dont suggest a game mechanic. This is what we should do in forums ourself

Hey guys, lets discuss how to make RVR to be fun for both sides here: For that i have a suggestion made here:

my suggestions is here:

The sever population is high, RVR is fun. But RVR can cut morale, fun and population of a nation, that lost couple of ports and battles. It is also not fun at all to fight empty Portbattles. My question is: How to make RVR fun for both sides? I write this, because british players threat in forums, that their nation will depopulate, when they being attacked further. In the end of the discussion i want to summarize the suggestions and write them in this post.

Open Forum Diplomacy needs to come back as part of RVR! Both RVR sides should communicate to each other about their gaols, what they intend, what is the impact etc etc in a declaration of war. And this is how it goes: Before or while attacking a region, someone on behalf of attacking clans do a formal war declaration here in forums. The info should include, what Clans and Nations will take part, and most important, what goals do the attacker have, for example: We take region A, B, C We demand you to stop reinforcing enemy screen fleet elsewhere We demand tribute We deman you to open/close certain ports Total anihilation: we will attack as long as we like ........ The attacker should mention what happens after the goals are achieved e.g. how long the RVR cease fire will be, etc. Someone on behalf of attacked clans responds immediately or later during the war: taking region C will threaten the population of our nation e.g. because of main crafting port area we will defend/not defend region A, B, C (avoiding empty port battles) we will use/not use the legal mechanic of changing timers we will take region A, B, C from the attacker we will demand reparations In the same Thread other clans could state, if they will help to any side. As it is of course hard to foresee how battles will impact on the participants, both sides, inform each other in the same thread about changes, ability to attack and defend. They can use their first Post, so it dont get lost because a lot of other people will comment with bullshit. I also will request elsewhere, that Thread creators should get the ability to open and close their threads, so a thread stays clear of trolling Why should someone do it anyway? if one side dont communicate, it leads to speculations Advantages for both sides: no unfounded "A want destroy B" accusations less empty portbattles and boredom statements of participiants don´t get lost in other forum threads less players leave game/nation to early or at all, because they think they are doomed bigger propability that a loosing nation can recover more clearity about who is with whom clarity about everything and less forum drama and bullshit Disadvantages: .... Please tell me, what should be added and i eventually will add stuff by marking it in another colour.

Join a clan!

Shame to Brits, who dodge RVR with night times on this weekend. Salamanca and Belize has a timer at 5 o clock in the morning after maintanace today