Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Holm Hansen

Members
  • Content count

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

34 Excellent

1 Follower

About Holm Hansen

  • Rank
    Ordinary seaman

Recent Profile Visitors

328 profile views
  1. Poll: Grinding ship slots and rare books?

    Correct .... ... but what does it mean: And sorry, but what you qouted was an answer for the question the post above that, how a possible option in this poll could be named. My bad, i forgot to quote the question.
  2. Poll: Grinding ship slots and rare books?

    Hmm.... not easy .... Maybe something like that: " I like char improvements, unlocking new possibilities and achievements during the game! However, the improvements and the way to reach it, should be reconsidered." (if they were achievable by what you are doing in this game anyway, I would not call it a "grind" either)
  3. Poll: Grinding ship slots and rare books?

    correct Btw: maybe you should add that as a possible answer in you poll: "Grind" yes, but in a slightly different way. I had missed exactly that and the other possible answers even lesser match with what I wanted. Not everyone wants to write something about it, and then he rather takes one of the (4!!) negative answers that would completely eliminate the system instead to improve it and make it's acceptable for the most.
  4. Poll: Grinding ship slots and rare books?

    I had changed my post and added an important fact. Is grind then grind when you achieve something along the way and constantly improve with the activity which one you do anyway ? Or is grind only grind, if you must to do something different for it than you actually want to do? As I said in my first post, it may not be the right way to reach those goals. But to take it out without any replacement I would also think is wrong.
  5. Poll: Grinding ship slots and rare books?

    That would be a confirmation of my answer. And if a skill tree is introduced here, it would also be right. Much better than random drops. And I also agree that this progress should not give too great benefits. But however, I already see the next survey to abolish this, if the progress in this is filled in the same way. Also, it is quite clear that a pvp player will never be satisfied if he can only achieve this progress in pve-gaming. And that is exactly what the most of answers will affect here.
  6. Poll: Grinding ship slots and rare books?

    What is a game worth without any goals? Where is the motivation if you have all and no chance to improve something for you? I know, the current way is not the best way to reach them, but its better then nothing. What remain as an long term improvement for a player if that will be removed? Making gold? ... if you have more than you ever need Having ships? ... if you have the maximum dock slots filled Sorry, but in the current state of the game i see nothing other what would be suitable for that. Should someone have a better idea to subtitute it with other goals, then it would be fine.
  7. Pls do Something about Idiotic NPC Ship behavior.

    It would be enough if these specific wind directions avoided from them. In most cases they also come on the other turning direction to the goal. It makes they would also be able to handle with the new sail mechanics. ... and it would also be a bit more of reality, I think.
  8. Pls do Something about Idiotic NPC Ship behavior.

    I can live with the behavior of the AI itself. It was not terribly good, but it first fulfilled its purpose, at times until other priorities of the game are completed. But they do their scripts as if they were motorboats. That had worked reasonably well with the old sail mechanics. With the new, however, no more and leads to the results we have now. It does not mean that I want to go back to the old sailing mechanic, only the pursued maneuvers of the AI should be depend to the wind direction.
  9. Pls do Something about Idiotic NPC Ship behavior.

    Is there no place in which no pvp discussions are conducted? The AI is part of the game. If you do not want it on the PVP server, then at least on the PVE server. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ And I agree with the thread opener, the behavior of the AI, as described, is really idiotic and sweep off a lot of fun and immersion in that game, actually.
  10. Bovenwinds Refit issue

    I have all my warships fitted with Bovenwinds AND "national" sailig refits (british rig or spanish rig), except this one, where in last days i tried to exchange British Rig Refit with Elite British Refit. On the other it worked, but it was at least some weeks ago.
  11. Bovenwinds Refit issue

    Thanks for the answer, but since when? It worked the same way some time ago and I did not read anything about it that was intended to change it. I only read that you cannot combine multiple "Elite" upgrades.
  12. Bovenwinds Refit issue

    I can not equip ships using Bovenwind's refit with other upgrades. And vice versa. The upgrade always "jumps" out of the slot. Clan member have reported the same issues to me. Is that intended? I remember that such a bug with another upgrade (don´t remember which) existed and was fixed. I hope that it will be the same case here.
  13. Online 652....es tut sich etwas....

    ... das hat auch nen ganz einfachen Grund. Solange wie ich die Entwicklung des Spiels hier verfolge waren die devs fast ausschliesslich damit beschäftigt Spielmechaniken den Wünschen der PVP-Spieler anzupassen und wieder zu verwerfen. PVE-Elemente des Spiels wurden dadurch vernachlässigt. Interessenten für PVE gibts mit Sicherheit genug. Nur werden diese mit dem jetzigen Zustand des Produktes kaum befriedigt und werden nach kurzer zeit wieder inaktiv. Also ist es wohl etwas falsch ständig daraus die Grösse der Interessentengruppen zu schliessen.
  14. Spielerschwund? Kein Wunder!

    Das ist allerdings in Hostility Missions etwas schwieriger als in normalen Combat Missions, da man am Anfang schon in Feuerreichweite der Gegner plaziert wird. Und wenn ich mir den Screenschot ansehe, hat der Threadersteller auch genau das versucht. ich schätze mal ne Aga is da auch ganz schnell zerschossen. Also bleibt doch mal bitte etwas fair, Leute. Auch muss ich ihm bei den Schwierigkeitsgraden der 6th rate Missions recht geben. Das liegt zum einen an der Missionszusammenstellung, zwei Rookie Snows als Gegner haben nun mal die doppelte Feuerkraft wie eine einzelne Snow, auch wenn man sie ausmanövrieren kann. Zum anderen liegt es auch daran daß seit dem letzten Wipe gerade die Schiffe der 6th rate unter sich, weitaus empfindlicher geworden sind. Drei bis vier gute Breitseiten (für die KI aus ziemlich jeder Entfernung kein Problem) und die Bordwand ist schon mal runter. Schätze mal das haben die wenigsten von euch hier bemerkt, weil ihr auf diese Schiffsklasse nun mal nicht angewiesen seid. Ein Tutorial gibt es noch nicht, weil das meiste an Spielmechaniken noch nicht festliegt, es müsste dann eh laufend angepasst werden. Aber man muss eben mit diesen Unzulänglichkeiten klarkommen (das Spiel ist nun mal noch im Alpha Zustand) und irgendwann hat man es auch hinter sich, daß sie einen grossartig stören.
  15. The PvE server needs some attention...desperately!

    And its at least an incentive for port battles or other actions to influence a port. This, or other benefits, it could be anything that can enjoy several clans in one harbor at the same time. All that what only one clan in the same harbor and time can accomplish (port-capture i.e.), will be a PVP-thing in my opinion. Because it block then other clans or players in their interests.
×