Kejsaren

Like your idea, but in order for it to be put to good use the whole "reward" for capturing traders needs a re-work. When sinking a fully loaded indiaman because it's more rewarding to do that, then to actually keep the ship and cargo, then something is very wrong. Hope this gets changed.

Interesting idea, too bad capturing a trade ship's cargo is rarely worth it. Traders are sunk for pvp missions mostly. Even if i capture a purple indiaman with super upgrades and full of white oak logs there is no point in me capturing it. Because I have to take the ship back to a friendly port wich probably is long way. And if indiaman is full of cargo mission items there is no point either, because I have to sail back and get rid of my warship first, then sail back again to deliver cargo and most likely get attacked trying to do so aswell.

Yes you got everything wrong, even wrong about what part you actually got wrong.😂🤣

1. You clearly don't understand what I write. 2. You write shit only based on your own assumption. 3. Pls just hello kitty off. Lmao. Get back on your indiaman.

Staunberg go comment someone elses post, sure someone is writing a line or two about npc warfare. Your contribution will probably have greater affect there.

First off, teak/teak... Second, whenever I bring Endy or Trinco I get 10 v 1 for 3+ hours, they chase retag, chase retag... so.. no thanks. Someone who doesn't understand solo hunting shouldn't comment on it. Besides I having plenty of fun sinking many ships both trade ships and warships..😉

Decided this one deserves a spot here, not because of the BR difference (seen worse) but because of dutch determination of catching a hercules... 4 Trincos and 1 Endymion... Zzzzzz... 1 hour and 15 minutes later they give up. My respect(?) to them though, personally I would never EVER chase a shitty Hercules for 1 hour and 15 minutes lol!.

Indeed, anyone going solo to raid hostile waters deserve a good gank..😉 Law of naval action.

I would say no. Even if different nation, if you have choosen a side then you should act accordingly. Anything else is just cheesy and cowards way of abusing game mechanics. In my opinion loot stealers should consider doing the tutorial, maybe they will be able to sink some npc's on their own😙 P.s Why the heck anyone would bother with that shit anyway lol, sounds about as thrilling as ganking an lgv in a 25 ship pb fleet. Yay!, @MassimoSudbring that Borkin guy over to Baracoa instead or he not allowed to join your hunting party?😂

Next time don't hold back, just shoot the bastard. If devs want punish for that, I would prefer the punishment then to let someone get away with stealing from me😉

Go to any area and you will find same treatment, you know that😉

Both my ship and opponent ship taking in water fast and both almost no structure left. I happened to sink first and soon as i sink he can exit battle and voilá.... he keep his ship and can claim victorious. For me, if both ships are sinking, then both ships are sinking and nobody is getting out. In suggest that if your ship is taking in water, you cannot exit battle until either a) you sink, or b) you manage to stop the ship from taking in water This something that didn't happen recently and not really a priority among Devs to-do list. But haven't seen it being brought up before so here I go😉 Salut!

Despe you want to discuss player numbers or you want to discuss "New Reward System"..? 😂

I been pvp'er since 2017, so i am not saying saying this for my own benefit... but we have players here who enjoy both pvp/pve.. why send them to pve server?. Why even bring pve server up?... you think we have so many people that we only need hardcore pvp'ers on pvp server?... you missed the fact that population has almost half size in just couple of month?.... Wake up...

Thank you I was getting worried that i have huge trouble explaining myself...

Wtf are you talking about?.. does anyone understand what i write?.. please any english speaking check what I wrote and comment... am i completely unable to make myself understood?.

You not understand what i write, at all... If you are in a small trader your chances of winning are ZERO, NADA.. no matter if I am in a privateer or Hercules or endy or anything else that can catch you.

Love keeping things simple, but c'mon... If i was to take a wild guess how many times this happen in let's say.. 20 pvp battles i would say.... 1. If i was to take a wild guess how many of 20 battles ending up being a gank.. i would say.... 15. You see where i am going with this right?... Sorry but wtf are you talking about....

Too complicated and makes little sense. If i attack a trader ship it doesn't matter what ship I am in, if i can catch it.. then battle is won. Wether it's in a Privateer or in an Endymion. (talking small trade ships).

No, mission and silver chest are shit. Only reward worth is gold chest. Keep as it is. No, sinking 10 trader brigs should not give you 20 cm and 2 gold chest. Either remove trader ships from pvp reward system or they need their own category. As for the rest, not sure i am all for increasing the rewards but not sure i am against it either so will leave it at that. Been highlighted many times by myself and others, thus totally agree. But usually only when you start solo hunting you realise the reward system is bad and needs change.

How is qualify as a (most redicolous) gank... couple of noobs with probably same BR as you or less. Sorry, proper NA gank is usually 3-4 times your own br (vets included). Apart from that, well done... 😉

Maybe if game is not measured by number pvp battles / port battles (because that does not reflect quality). Focus on improving game first and those numbers will go up. Throw that duck-tape that has been used in the trash where it belongs and do proper fixes, Your game deserves that, and the players too.

This is just another of those permanent "quick" fixes being applied to the game to raise statistics of numbers of port battles, pvp battles etc. I think they fail to identify and target the real issues. Issue: Low rvr activity Devs solution: Give them free shitty ships Result: Increased rvr activity (i.e one side getting slaughtered by the other) Some things that are broken can be fixed with duck-tape, but sometimes better to remove and replace broken part.

I could post a screenshot of my ignore list, then you add HMS in front of those names and you will see why this is bad idea. Possibly if can choose between a list of names..., but.. not really very optimal solution either. I would just leave as it is.

Solo with benefits😉