-
Posts
3,127 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Teutonic
-
-
Personally I prefer if we could get more outpost slots.
- 4
-
a few battles the other day in hispaniola PZ. really fun fights, I hope to continue the trend of US timezone engagements for that sweet damage farming.
-
6 hours ago, z4ys said:
Waiting for the first conspiracy theory claiming LAMA dropped the port so Prussians can get Trinidad and sale trou without fighting because Brits are busy doing hostility for Santiago de cuba so it's not controlled buy russian/Swedish ALTs
this just in!
LAMA dropped port and sent an ultimatum stating they will be taking all the Les Cayes county!!!
-
It's almost like the normal cycle of a player in NA, some months you relax and stop playing, other months you play for 8 hours a day. 🤔
- 2
-
5 hours ago, [TOXIC] LoneHunter said:
Are you throwing dirt at me while hiding behind Liq and Redii?
Im sorry looks like I did not made things clear.
I dont know why havoc went to swedes , but the fact that mostly dutch clans/players left the nation and went to swedes after cartagena just looks like running chickens.
looks like I did not makes things clear either.
There is a rather large group of "swede" who have always been Sweden. your generalization is an insult to them.
- 2
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Liq said:
Would be interesting to see what the communitys opinion is on removing port bonusses I would vote for it. Problem then of course is what to do with the current existing ships?
100% would vote to kill port bonuses.
just keep investments purely econ based, resources, rare trade goods.
it would have been 100% better if "port bonuses" meant unlocking Refits that we can't normally craft (like Boston Harbor Refit or Redoutable Refit) or making sure you can CHOOSE your refit type.
- 7
-
25 minutes ago, [TOXIC] LoneHunter said:
And swedes are just Havoc + all the other players which ran away from the russians cause they ***** it up , and together they all are the new zerg/swarm whatever nation , which tries to control the RvR of others.
riiiiiiiiiight, just Havoc + rest, right. we all ran away, right .
@Liq @rediii comments? should we subscribe to the HAVOC + all? I can get the business cards sorted.
-
some battles at la mona pz today:
-
4 hours ago, shunt said:
what amazing hypocrisy CRC is a swedish clan ,,, trux would have belonged to sweden ,,, your actually claiming its abuse that a swedish clan capturing trux stopped a swedish clan capturing trux
yet in your eyes its ok for Havoc to switch from dane to sweden and prevent danes defending in port battle
the only people that have a right to be upset by trux is GB
same as danes should be upset by sj
they are both exactly the same
you want to continue stating CRC is not an alt clan of BASTD Members? we have a lot of evidence to say the contrary :).
in any event, Devs have found a solution that should solve the major issue most of us had with the "way" truxillo was flipped (which also contrary to popular belief was different from San Juan).
-
1 hour ago, admin said:
agree
perhaps its time to sell hostility missions. That would solve most of the problems.. 50,000 doubloons per each..
And add reward for taking a port.. 150,000 to recover the hostility mission costIt would make faking expensive.
Or add a clear goal to hostility missions - which must be fulfilled and if it is not no new missions will be available in this region or from this port.1 hour ago, Liq💋 said:Still waiting to see BASTD change to sweden and join their new clan CRC
oh wait...
That would mean two unofficial allied nations could keep taking each others ports and gain net. 100'000 doubloons every time.. not sure
the incentive to show up and win could be a reward for more than the cost.
I'm not sure if 50k doubloons WOULD be the cost for hostility missions, but if it was I think RvR would die. I know it was just an example.
I really liked the Flag System for one major thing. It cost the clan/player money to buy the Flag, so if they didn't show to fight the PB they "wasted" that money. So I would like to see some sort of "cost" to hostility missions as well.
I still would definitely enjoy more rewards for winning/Losing a PB - like a "thank you for participating" reward?
-
28 minutes ago, Staunberg🇩🇰 said:
Actually not really. We never did any PB since release vs Sweden. We thought as them as friends. Even aftes Spanish town.
Why in the morning, because it was actually the best time to get players. We did have a full Pb. Normaly we are 3-5 players online. Plus we had hoped to fight Bork. We are not at the level as the Mighty Havoc, so we where looking for a fight against an egual opponent.
I'm touched to be considered equal 😀.
Truth is we were fighting battles in the windward channel and totally forgot there was a PB.
We even had plans to go to watlings for ow pvp and forgot that too. Just #UStzthings.
-
truly interesting times we live in (in NA).
- 1
-
Personally, I believe we should be able to invest port points in order to create rare resources like wood.
That...or
When controlling an entire county, the owning clan of the capital should be able to have that port drop rare resources.
I personally always found it irritating that resources used in crafting modules we found in unconquerable ports. I do agree that if we are to have them in the nation's unconquerable capital, then all nations should have a resource used in a good mod. It would definitely be a boon for all players to have the ability to personalize their owning ports, or pave the way for economic success through trade exploits.
-
-
3 minutes ago, pietjenoob said:
oke.......
don't worry.
we all know that screenshots can't be sent to phones - ...wait
-
9 minutes ago, BloodyRaven said:
I haven't seen you pointing that when Havok flipped San Juan (blocking all possibility of port defence - simple exploit) and basically killed Danish nation.
there's a difference.
10 havoc do a hostility mission to flip san juan.
1 random swede "invites" 9 russians to flip truxillo.
if you don't know what's wrong with that then I can't help you.
there was a suggestion before that seems so obvious that we have to question why it wasn't fixed before -- the nation creating the hostility mission is the only nation that can enter the attacking side.
- 2
-
1 minute ago, BloodyRaven said:
I'm not mad or angry. I'm not even PB player, coz I do not like sailing big ships. I'm simply pointing that these so called "exploits", like Swedes are calling them now, are normal in open world games with global diplomacy and economy. These games copies real world in that areas and you WON'T change it. That's why these games are so bloody cool to play.
in Eve Online, the Devs made it explicitly clear what is allowed and not allowed when it comes to mechanics.
however, in Naval Action, we don't have clear rules regarding what is allowed and not allowed in a lot of "issues."
There's a difference.
- 2
-
7 minutes ago, Sea Archer said:
Historically random fire was used in the hot phase of a battle, when every ball counts and should be shot as fast as possible.
Firing from bow or stern was for reduces strain, while the fire was still somehow controlled.
The full simultaneous broadside, causing more confusion at the enemy, causes the maximum strain. Which I would love to see in game.
maybe random fire could have a bonus to reload shocking an enemy? but then i don't know how you would "make" that work.
-
1 minute ago, Genevieve Malfleurs said:
it´s a little different here. big swedish clans have rogue players that do their own business cause they are pissed with their leaders attitudes. crc just cut truxillo from havocs food-chain. a funny move to me. and nice to see that nation isn´t as united as it seems. no wonder with all these nation hoppers though.
again, if you guys are seriously ok with "how" this was done.
then no one is going to like what is coming.
- 3
-
Just now, Genevieve Malfleurs said:
an ego thing i guess. that´s why some swedes decided to do some business on their own. and as we can see, the accusing machine runs already
59 minutes ago, Liq said:Just an addition from my side:
If this gets classified as "alright", you open the pandoras box of alt witchery.
19 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:so what?
you realize that if you're all fine with this and it somehow becomes "alright" as liq said, it's going to cause a huge shit-storm of game breaking proportions and in the end no one will have fun. no one is going to like what comes of this if THIS is not addressed NOW.
this isn't time to be smug about how we found a way to abuse the RvR system, this is seriously something worrying.
- 9
-
2 hours ago, Sneakyfinger said:
people are just going to accuse people they don’t like of being a spy
yep.
- 1
-
looking for atwoods and george's town.
-
Mosquito Cay PB
Swede Fleet Commander(s): Teutonic (HAVOC Support)
British Fleet Commander(s): ---
Outcome: Swedes defend against the bee swarm. Really tough to fight against, requires a lot of communication from your fleet bros. Thanks to everyone who was patient and sailing close.- 3
- 1
-
Fresh RVR History (from 06-2019)
in Caribbean News
Posted
all russians ports are true russians ports 🤔....or do you think they have a different flag?