Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Meraun

Members2
  • Posts

    670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Meraun

  1. 1 hour ago, rediii said:

    What did you even think you would get there at bluefields after destroying the whole british fleet? and why did reds attack brangmans first and not bluefields? You guys just want to get closer to the british craftingport

    as far as i know, beeing just a grunt. we switch there because the brits switch all PB Timers and killed RvR in Salamanca.

  2. 11 hours ago, Admiral Howe of Gibraltar said:

    BF is Russia. 

    bullshit, BF is one half of Russia.

    Can you maybe write down some RvR rules for us? When are we allowed to attack wich Port? in wich Ships and wich upgrades?  What, in your Opinion woud be legit RvR to play?

     

  3. 2 minutes ago, Slim McSauce said:

    Constitution is a frigate, it does not belong under 3rd rate classification.

    Wrong, rate in NA is defined by broadside weight. Indefa und conni belong into  4th and 3rd.

     

    Then again, it doesnt matter anyway. BR is waht counts not the rate. Rate is irrelevant besides the killmissions, tameplay wise

  4.  

     

    6 hours ago, Raekur said:

    The only real plus to the DLC ships is as Stalememes said, you can redeem them in any port. That is it. You can say "with the proper upgrades" this and that and all you're doing is adding variables. Any ship can be a "beast' with the proper upgrades, but apply the same upgrades on a crafted ship and it will beat a herc. So the end result is that the DLC's are good for fast response ships without having to use a tow to get a ship to a particular port. And even then, chances are you will be stuck using medium guns as most of the DLC ships are viewed as throwaways to respond or harass someone who has entered your nations waters.

    Sounds balanced to me.

  5. On 7/9/2019 at 4:40 PM, Spaccavento said:

    I'm member of a clan that has a fully upgraded port with all the ship bonuses. I got the DLC Rattvisan (and other DLC) and these DLC not take any of these port bonus !

    It's that a joke that cost 33 Euro or a bug or what ????

    I spent money for use a ship that can be sunk by any not DLC ship of the same rank with port bonuses just because i my DLC ship can't have port bonuses ?

    Since you can redeem it every 24h its more den Balanced!!!

    • Like 5
  6. 23 minutes ago, Mrgoldstein said:

    I have 0 problems with there being a zerg, as long as the zerg has the interest of the game at heart.

    If they decide to 1 port every nation of take all the crafting ports of nations just because they can and people will start leaving the game because of it, or will stop having fun because they cant compete anymore, yes then im opposed to having a zerg..

    Noone is better off with a dead server and 300players again.

     

    iam a 100% sure  the Leadership in the Russian Clans is aware of that problem. And RvR is done accordingly.

    • Like 1
  7. 17 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said:

    Your screening fleet was much bigger than ours, also it was lower ranked and much less experienced. But they did their job. Only one third of our PB fleet could enter PB, since we didn''t have a countdown to enter PB simitanously and most of us got dragued into another battle due to multiple tags which were running. Clear victory for Britain in PB.

    It was very cocky that you sacrificed your PB fleet after to try to kill ours. Anyway thanks for that mistake. Was a fun battle. You fought well and I got 4.200 xp out of it. No waste of time in ranking up for me. We had equal numbers of 1. and 2. Rates in this battle. Even though your players are  lower ranked. But undercrewing is not such a disadvantage. So no big inbalance in this matter. We will find out, if your war industry is as good as your players already are after this loss of players in the last weeks.

    Result is. Britain is a worthy enemy and no nation with much lower ranked and less skilled players we could smash with ease, how I feared.

    you know Graf, i like sailing and fighting with you in REDS, but damn, you can be pretty Snobbish.... 😅 

    @rediii Defending Screens is usally Suicidal anyway... it was at Nassau and Santa Domingo for us and now at Salamanca for the Brits.

    But nice Battles anyway!

  8. 7 hours ago, z4ys said:

    19E18D437A1CB637BC8EEC70D92B0D50D9A6E10F

    Got attacked and defended then got ganked and counterganked -  when a gank goes wrong bring the wasa they said....

    20190705001626_1.thumb.jpg.83f48907581f8c862a7ead2efa125b09.jpg

    on a Side note, you were radining our Tradeships in the Gulf, Cost Patrol isnt" Ganking ":-) you gotta expect to be attacked when raiding on an enemy Coastline.

    Yeah, in the first battle, we had no way to keep our Stern clear. We tried by crossing each other stern (as you probably saw)   We gotta ajust our counter if you Raid with small ships. Dont worry, we will be there in a different Setup next time :-)

    Fun battles anyway! a good lesson in not underestimating 6th rates just because you are in bigger ships.

    • Like 3
  9. We are afraid it woud take the 2 Devs attention away from the Main Game. Wich still needs work.. (i hope they are working on Raids)

    Also, since the Devs very clearly said that there wont be any Arena Mode again, its just a waste of time.

    i also think the the fear of lose is waht keeps us ingame. I have played War Thunder and World of  Tanks and Warships. i played them for like 50h before i got bored. Why? Because losing a Plane/Tank/Ship means NOTHING at all. just hop into another Ship/*/*/* and keep going. The fights werent Tense. No sweaty palms no lying in  bed ad night and think "waht coud i have done better?" just nothing. Casual, meaningless Gaming.

    The fact that it hurt so much is waht makes this game Tense. You cant do taht in an arena game..

    Its just like Ironman mode in paradox games. Everything else ist just boring.

     

    • Like 2
  10. 14 minutes ago, Liberalism said:

    I wonder if people understand that by removing Russian zerg from the game, they will create a pirate or British zerg or some other zerg instead. Removing nations doesn't stop people from zerging another. Thanks to many nations, we can actually choose low populated nation for better experience. Personally, I don't like overcrowded nations.

    True, There is always a Zerg in this Games. Its just the nature of it.  The only Discussions "who is it?" :-)

  11. 19 minutes ago, qw569 said:

    Unbelievable. I found my archive. So I'm add some data to your message :D

    So first mention about port owned by BF in Russian Empire dated by July 6, 2018.

    Before (July 5, 2018) Russian Empire had 10 ports (San Andrés, Tulum, Conil, Apalachicola, Manataca, Conttoy, Somerset, Flatts, Saint George's Town, Guacata). Apalachicola produced White Oak Log.

    Let's watch what happen in one month.

    Russian Empire have 16 ports (Governor's Harbour, George Town, Fajardo, Ambergrease Caye, Congrios, Tulum, Xpu Ha, Conil, Conttoy, Somerset, Flatts, Saint George's Town, North Inlet, Kidd's Harbour, Guacata, Rum Cove). BF owned 5 ports including North Inlet which produced White Oak Log.

    In two month Russian Empire have 17 ports.

    In three month 18 ports. BF owned 5 ports

    I look forward to

    @Captain Reverse #murderbynumbers

×
×
  • Create New...