Aussie Pastor

So you are not fighting the pirates due to it will be fighting yourself. LOL

Oh, my God........Are you SERIOUS!!!! Are you just "Trolling" me??? Have I just got Punked in the forums? Or are you just that ..........? PM me if you really need to answer it. Because it is such a drama for such a simple thing and that was your, I'm and others are so offended.? Well must not like my thread that wants to reduce the nation fron 8 to 6, get rid of the Danish and Swedish nations as the map location of capitals is to small and the map is to small for that kind of multiple fronts. No that WILL be offending to you.

YES YOU ARE RIGHT.....In the game it's the nation os of the Danes. But I'm referring to the PLAYER MAJORITY, which is Russian, why is that so hard to understand. I can't believe we are stepping this out post by post. 1 + 1 = 2 So a + b = c That is A = the GAME Nation B = the MAJOR PLAYER BASE C = the Russians Simple, that is why it not a remark to have people take offence.

What post are you talking about??? I'm a REAL LIFE CHRISTIAN PASTOR so of course I'm Pro Isreal, because I'm pro JESUS CHRIST. So I got no idea what you are trying to say? Are you being Passive-Aggressive?

Who has tried to use them??If you read the posts just above, T Emperor and Wang have made contact and closing up the assumptions. Britton has ALWAYS work on respect to diplomacy. The problem is To many Chiefs and EGOS, not enough open dialog to help the Devs and the community for the Game sake.

Yes, that would be the best thing for this game, but can it be done???? It would solve so many problems. Is there any games out there that can do this???

Well done, that is what I'm have been talking about, let us be Proactive not reactive and full of Assumptions. So well done, for reaching out, remember it's the Game we want to win not our own little "MICROREWARDS".

Sorry mate,But you clearly missed the main point that Wang was saying. YOU have not PM to say hey STOP talking to that man. You need to talk to us. He stated that he has only seen a few post, never seen you on TS where he is to introduce yourself and say "it would be better to talk to me" It is the presumptions that you put in your post, that has WANG and others saying that the Spanish are hard to deal with. In regards to the British, backstabbing the Spanish.....I'm the most critical poster in our forums stating that Spain left Cuba to Panama was the MOST SELFISH MOVE I HAVE EVER SEEN. That's because Habana is the Starting area and Capital and then The Gulf of Mexico was let go. Why, it was to hard to play against the US. Wake up and smell the coffee! The game is in EA, and people are playing it like its a full release. The community NEEDS to come together and self agree hoe to play until the ingame mechanism are in place. Update!!! T Emperor and Wang have made contact, start of great coordination for the win of the game and player enjoyment.

And that is what I'm talking about. Actions speak louder than words. Best predictions of future behaviour is ALWAYS past behaviour. So what do we do, in the mean time, while the is NO GAME SAFEGUARDS???

No, I'm Bosnian Serbian heritage, I have more of and inclination towards Russia than the Western Countries. I'm talking about the playing styles. Have you ever played chess with people from different nations? Then you would understand.

This is the most silliest assumption I've ever seen, you really think I don't no about the game is Multinational? If you read the post, I'm saying that the MAJORITY of the players are Russian, and I'm talk about the MAJORITY player group. To try to not offend every single person is an ABSOLUTE implausible ask. If you and other Danes are offended, I'm sorry, but to try to be Politically Correct in this forum is Completely outrageous. By the way are the Canadains offended when playing the US or British that they are referred to as US or British. So can you understand, your scope of the terms used by the people is due to the sheer wait of number. So what do we call the Pirate nation players, Satan spawn or Jack Sparrow Love children. Please have sum understanding next time before putting on the guilt to people that are talking common sense wise.

Would love to, can you give me an accurate head count of the players playing the Danes. If the Russian players have more than 66% well that is a majority. If our perception is wrong, I do humbly apologize.

If you look closely, the article is of a non clan British Cpt. The Slightly negative feel to the document is probably due to the fact, SPAIN is breaking it peace pacts with Britain. That is why its not listed. Because they are at war with themselves. Half of EL against RAE and RACC. Also, many people are talking about Server PvP EU 1. The focus is not the development but lets play the game like EVE and wipe the map. So lets look at the Russians..... The Russian factions of the Pirates/Danes and little Ally Dutch. Look how their do diplomacy/treaties with the French and Swedish; how did that go? The US Wiped out a small french group in the Gulf, the pushed Spain from their Capital and Cuba. The Britts, Holding the center of map and creating narrow fronts for opportunity for new players to grind and old Trafalgar to PvP and PB. The SUMMARY is that while the game has no in game Alliance system, or a safety for Nations still having a Safety Area Number of Ports eg 5 around the Capital. The Big thing we can do out side of the game DEVELOPERS is have the community remember it is an EARLY ACCESS GAME. Help the game develop, not get your EGO fluffed by having the whole map conquered.

Hope this continues at least a weekly meeting, but may develop into a set twice a week cycle.

That's, what I'm talking about, not restricting freedom or choice. But look at the map, place the capitals on it. Check the zones of range of playing for teams. I just think, that 6 is more optimal than 8. Maybe have France not have a historical Capital but move it from the East to the west in the gulf? And move the others around to Panama etc. Again it about mechanics, that's why I keep trying different "Similarly" to show the point. Unlike my poor Canadain freind thinking I pull old tricks, no, it's young heads not understanding an old person fumbling with metaphors to extract great knowledge that all you guys have, through "door stop" headlines and explanations. LOL

The point is my poor banana eating friend is, that Exp and Gold is then lost from a guy that is concentrating on a PvP grind instead of mission/Fleet grind.I hope using the Lords name in vain is due to I started the post, for that is poor taste in deed and against forum CoC. Should I have said all "Salties" to PM me, instead of putting it on the open forum. Like I said at the start, I hated the lack of PvP on WatchDogs, plus if this game PvP is I don't care as my time is way to valuable to stay and fight, well sorry go to the PvE server. So this was mainly about anti exploit game mechanics. Not salty opinions!!!

Thank you Henry. The patch will happen, when it happens. I just hope it is done early in the week. Monday or Tuesday night. I say night, for MAINTENANCE TIME IS ON AUSTRALIA PRIME TIME. A good last post to now close the thread I think.

That's what I was seeing it like. You guys do amaze me more and more. Keep up the good work. I hope some of you with the strong clear understanding on how this could be done try to start to "workshop" it in TS, TRY TO TEAM UP, you may be in different Servers, nations, time zones etc but talk to each other develop new friendship and enjoy the journey.

So, the is no real way to stop an exploit of the aspect of someone farming Alts surrendering? Fight to death is what I like especially if I catch on fire, I like to see the ships flee, for I'm going out in a blaze of glory (he! he! he!), Fire/blaze get it!!! Well I thought it was funny. I like the depth of knowledge you guys are bringing to the discussion about crews value. Hope this is helping the Devs!

Historically, if two nations need to be dropped is Sweden and Dane-Norway. For they only had one Port each in the early 1800's Why is it so hard to get people's head around culling these two nations. 6 nations only WITH the diplomatic gameplay added. So French/US or Britt/ Pirate was a bit historically the way, but we can do many different things and still enjoy the game and have freedom and flexibility. My concern is why hasn't Admin, Ink etc responding, would love some Devs/Mods feedback.

Did you play Pirates of the Burning Sea? Sid Meirs Pirates?That was 4 & 3 nations......was that to restricting for you to play? The main POINT, is gameplay not freedom of choice or taking away variety, but making a mechanism in the game more optimal. So can we also then have an Ottoman corsairs, Zheng Shi Nation, do you want me to go on??? The main point is that having the optimum number of opponents to the playing area! The map we are on right NOW, has been only at 4, but 6 can work, but 8 is overkill. Played tennis, two sides with one or two players, would you like to have a third on the court? How about five teams on the football field at once, but keep the same structure? How many players would you like to play on the Roulette table 20! Well you be the croupier on that table and see how long you last??? No can you see what I'm getting at, REALLY the guy that said 8 playing nations in the Carribean is not really optimal.

I know it can be exploited, but we need good ideas. I hated that PVP in "WatchDogs" when people DC'ed on you

Should you get Max Exp and Gold when a player Surrender in PvP ? Any thoughts? Sorry if it is a duplicate.

Why no, to less Nations?

I'm crashing too, it looks like my ATI 7970 is dying.