_Alucard_

Como habréis podido comprobar, esta semana no ha estado online por un problema con la base de datos. La verdad es que no se cómo ha pasado, pero se ha perdido toda la info y no era recuperable. Asi que he decidido comprar un hosting y ponerlo ahí desde 0. Tardan 24 horas en activar el dominio, en cuanto esté listo ya os lo hago saber. PD: todos los que ya os habíais registrado tendréis que hacerlo de nuevo y el foro estará vacío. Es lo que hay. Mañana os pongo el dominio, que es practicamente igual.....

So, let's imagine this situation: Nation A gets a PB after 2 days of hard work heating a zone against let's say GB (largest population). GB doesn't care about the heating, and they let the hostility grow up until the PB is granted. Nation A must go to the port and enter the Port Battle. GB instead, just has to wait in that area with let's say 50-60 players with screening fleets. Nation A got a PB with 4th rates, so GB decides to wait with 2nd and 1st rates outside the port in order to kill the attackers.... How can a small nation get a win in that situation?

If you are "heating" a certaing area you just have to heat then the regional capital, right? If that's true, there is no point in heating a port that isn't a regional capital. If that's true, you can lose ports even faster than before the patch, which is not good at all.You would lose not only the capital but all the ports in that region. Can you answer these questions, please?

¡La leche! ¡¡¡Si es gallego!!! PD: Aprovecho para decir que no estoy nada de acuerdo con lo que propone el tal "vocero de indias"

Ok, let's do one thing. Everybody stop posting here, let the topic die, and prepare for the new patch.

So, you consider a war 2 or 3 vs 1 fair, but not when you are in that position, don't you? When Spain was at war fighting 2 nations (GB and US.... well, US were not quite that active atm), you seem to have no problems at all joining that war and lauch attacks in the southeast of Cuba ( Puerto Escondido, Santiago, Guamá Sevilla and Portillo). Now, in the west, Spain was fighting the brits and VP alone and you had no problems at all. But, and this is the big but, when you are fighting Spain, France and Danmark is the precise moment you complain about the war, isn't it? Look, when Spain was fighting day in day out in Barranquilla 2 attacks (1 from GB and the other one from VP) you thought it was perfect and nothing to argue about that. So, when Spain was fighting 3 vs 1 several people told us that we should think if we had the right allies. Now the questions are: 1- Why do you complain when the war is 3 vs1 (please, don't include Sweden here, they only took 2 ports and were fighting the pirates) 2- Why don't you blame the most populated nation in the server for letting you go down? Is this what you would expect from a proper ally? Tell all the people in VP to think for at least 2 minutes about these questions.

When you came to our TS the flag had already been bought and that's true, we offered you the chance to stop that flag if we came to an agreement. But after our conversation, in which we did not agree on anything ,at least until the next day, when we would have another conversation, the flag was planted while we were discussing too what to do with this situation....so we could do nothing about that. So, if you think our good will depends only in that flag and that we are guilty for not stopping that flag: yes, we didn't stop the flag. But, we didn't attack you the next day and we offered you without conditions all you asked for (those 2 ports) and more (our ports in Maracaibo area) because we understood that the war was going too far..... Maybe this could clearify what happened.

Excuse me sir, but if you remember, Spain could not attack GB and VP, so we decided to attack US. Yes, you can say it's humiliation when you support US taking Spanish ports and fighting Spanish fleets on their way to attack US ports. And if I'm not wrong, the 3AT didn't include the US until they cried in the forum and realized what may happen. So, yes, that's humiliation to me. On the other hand, thank you for your kind words about our fleets.

Oh well, if we have short memory, can you please tell us when did Spain backstab GB? Because if I'm not wrong the only occasion you claim that happened is when we were allied with GB and we wanted to take back some ports because we needed them and GB instead of letting us take the fucking pixels, they decided it was worth to defend them and sink some Spanish ships and then talk. Is that what you understand for a backstab? Because if it is indeed what you understand for backstab, you'd better find a dictionary

We didn't backstab GB, never. The 3AT had finished when we declared war on GB. And by the way, if you had the balls to support your ally instead of doing nothing, this war could have been very different. That's your fault, not ours. With an ally like GB who did nothing to support VP, why would they ally you again?

Maybe you forgot to tell that you told us you can gather 4 or 5 fleets and we wouldn't be able to defend Maracaibo after the wipe. And by the way, when we had this conversation, you still had 8 or 9 ports. We had already launched the attack on Fort Oranje when you came to our TS. We didn't atack you the day after this conversation, and some french players not representing the nation, took 5 or 6 ports from you. You can't blame all France for those actions. With 8 or 9 ports you have that minimum space to do things, but unfortunately you ended up with only 2 ports and that is something we did not plan beforehand. And as you can see in the OP statement, Spain and France give back those ports without conditions, not imposing chains and humilliating the enemy as the 3 admirals treaty did.

Nada nada, mucho mejor hacer la guerra economica con solo 1 tio ( contra la nacion mas numerosa) que capturar puertos y destruir barcos al enemigo. Un dia de estos ya de paso te capturaremos ese puerto....... PD: puedes esperar sentado

No hubo ninguna descalificación Simplemente él escribió una frase absolutamente inofensiva y yo le respondí con un gif de un tío cerrando una puerta. Eso no necesita que nadie lo modere, porque ni yo le insulto ni él a mí. Deja que la gente se exprese que para esto sirve el foro....

Vale, parece que incluso un simple gif ahora es necesario eliminarlo........ Madre mía!!!

Well Mr Pellasgos bought the flag for Barranquilla yesterday but decided it was not worth to lose so many ships.......

A nadie engañas en esta facción. Vamos a ver si al moderador le parece mejor la frase así: es posible que te mires al espejo y veas a superman, cuando a lo mejor otro te ve y piensa que eres David el gnomo. ¿Vale así?

Claro, por eso estuvimos defendiendo el sureste de Cuba durante mas de 1 mes con ataques diarios de ingleses.......porque lo perdemos todos. -eliminadas descalificaciones personales-

The "you" is 2nd person of singular, not 2nd of plural. I meant the OP, not the dutch nation.

You clearly don't have a clue of what is happening in the west front. Well, you do have it, but you try to tell the story only in your own interest. You show only the screenshots where you "win" even though you did not capture the port. A port that previously had a 1st rate screening fleet (not yours) and when we were under attack of two other nations. Once you tried to come 25 vs 25 at Barranquilla and we kicked your ass so hard that you decided to change the tactic. Why don't you show that screenshot? You are doing a good job, but the OP is just bullshit.

We'll focus on the US and maintain them isolated there Just a joke, don't go mad on me