Pirates and French. same old. same old.

[Skully]

Pardon me Your Honors, but may I respectfully request the Court how it feels about being demanded dealing out punishment?

Therefore i opened this tribunal and demand higher punishment

[Black Spawn]

Pardon me Your Honors, but may I respectfully request the Court how it feels about being demanded dealing out punishment?

 

Now you are just acting juvenile. Even a spoken Strike would be a higher punishment.

 

Edit:

 

Friendly reminder:  All posts on here should be evidence, accuser, or accused.

Edited September 8, 2016 by Black Spawn

[Henry d'Esterre Darby]

This case is under review by the Admiralty, I have locked the thread since y'all can't follow the rules of the tribunal.  Warnings will be issued just as soon as I sort it out.

 

If DesMoines would like to respond, he may contact me via PM.

[Henry d'Esterre Darby]

In response to numerous recent reports of traitorous actions by supposedly allied Captains on the high seas, the Admiralty formally adopts a new rule regarding Green on Green damage:

Green on Green Damage Rules

Be it known that in response to numerous reports of traitorous and dastardly attacks being perpetrated by miscreants upon their fellow allied Captains, the Admiralty hereby announces that it will no longer tolerate these dishonourable, despicable depradations upon its ships.  You have been warned.  Damaging a friendly shall imperil your rank, and possibly even your commission!

 

Due to the number of green on green incidents reported by Captains in the Tribunal, the following rule is now adopted by the Admiralty.  This rule supersedes (replaces) all previous green on green rules:

 

Effective Immediately

 

Intentional Green on Green Damage is no longer permitted in Naval Action.

 

This rule is now in effect for everyone in the game, regardless of nation.  

 

If you are in battle, and a green player in that battle begins to intentionally damage you, put it into Tribunal.  The Tribunal case must have evidence attached with it - a verbal only accusation will not result in any action taken.  Video is preferred - conclusive video will result in the highest chance of the person being punished.  Screen shots may be accepted, if they are numerous enough and complete enough to show conclusively, at the discretion of the Admiralty, that you were being intentionally damaged by a friendly.  Do not, under any circumstances, return fire or damage the offending player yourself.  "Self Defense" may not excuse you from being found guilty of green on green damage.

 

Unlike previous rules, it is no longer required that the offender get credit for sinking the player.  Doing any kind of damage (the amount of damage done will vary based on the case) intentionally to a fellow green ship in a battle may be punishable.  Obviously, there are times when accidental friendly fire happens - the Admiralty will work to ensure the evidence presented conclusively proves the intent to damage the friendly, and not an accidental damage situation.

 

Upon a Guilty finding by the Admiralty, the following actions will be taken against the offender:

1st Offense: The offender will receive a warning.

2nd Offense: The offender will be demoted to the first rank.

3rd Offense: The offender's account will be banned on all servers.

 

The Admiralty reserves the right to bypass one or more levels of punishment at its discretion - do NOT assume that you can get away with it once and get off with just a warning.

 

Ships marked as smuggler, if they are green inside your battle, are included in this rule.  You can not, under any circumstances, intentionally damage a green ship in your battle, or you will be subject to the sanctions in this post.

Be it known that DesMoines has now officially received his first warning under this new act. This warning was issued due to his being a repeat offender in such a short period of time. Any future, documented, violation(s) by DesMoines of damaging a friendly ship will cause him to be reduced in rank.