Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Zorion

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About Zorion

  • Rank
    Landsmen
  1. Zorion

    False surrender a xebec only mechanic

    This would be not only for the Xebec. But if i am not mistaken and for naval actions that i read when a ship surrenders then if left alone for some time, she just sails away forgeting their surrender, it gave many problems for the captain and nation of this vessels. Unless they are pirates and care not at all with such issues, when this happened with a nation, it gave origin to protests and demands for the return of the vessel that surrender and then run away. i Believe the captain of those ships also suffered some penality. I will try to find the action i remember to read with an example of this, where a french frigate surenders but the action kept going and the british had no means to capture it so soon. the french frigate saw the oportunity to run away after having strike and did so. later the british presented a protest and demanded the ship to be handled to them,
  2. Zorion

    No Orcs, Elves, Dwarfes, or Trolls

    Yes please! We do need some order (diplomacy) against the present or inteded anarchy Mad Max style and i fully support the idea of the logistics! To me, its quite confusing to claim this is a realistic game for hardcore players when we simplify and make it so easy in the matter of logistics. Leaving ther port without caring or having to consider food, water amunitions, salaries or the plunder sharing to the crew (pirats) seems all but hardcore. I used play a online game where i would sail from Europe to India and Japan and back. the journey took 3 to 6 hours and i had to consider how much food, water, amunition and even the cost of the payment to the crew.
  3. We need to understand and above all we need to know and accept the Devs. vision and goals about how the outposts will influence the play. I seem to see two different intentions from the playerbase. Not all are extreme, there are those who play in the midle but lets watch the extremes. The players or Alts aiming for economy, trading or crafting play. These use the outposts for strategic resourse gathering and stockpile. The players that play the game mainly for action, PVP. These use most of their outposts as strategic stations for the raids and attacks. All of the players wish for more outposts, obviously but if the Devs plan is not to allow a player to be self-sufficient and force the need for interaction between players, then i do agree that we have maybe too much or near too mutch outposts. IMO also we need to end all forms of teleport. At the present time, having an outpost in other side of the map only cost the time of the first travel there. After this we play a kind of sci-fi strategic game. Distances mater not at all.
  4. Zorion

    Deep Portbattles and Small ships

    Greetings, I do not agree to ban the 6/7th rates from the deep water PBs. Instead i think we should try to persue some way to do incentives and disincentives towards the most realistic and historical situations, while not forbidding the non or less historical and less relistic situations. We play a open world sandbox, so i think we can accept some " what ifs". I do confess that im all for realism in game as much as we can. I would like to leave some sugestions about some issues that were raised while this topic is discussed. First; the balanced and most realistic looking fleets for PBs. Too many Oceans in this Ocean, at least in th PBs. How to balance this in an atempt to be close to realistic and historical approach? There several sugested fixes. IMO in the OW, the way to do this and in general to balance the use of the SOL can be achieved with the introduction of the maintenance but only the maintenance will not fix the hose PBs where we see almost 25 Oceans and only Oceans. After all, even with maintenace, a PB is why these SOL were made for and the expenses are justified. The way to incentive or disincentive the use of the different ships is easely done, i think, by adjusting their BR. Increase it to make it less apealing but not too much to make it usless. I think it would look amazing and feel much more immersive and more Age of sail if we could tend to have PBs where we would see in a fleet something like 2 or 3 1st rates, 3 to 4 2nd rates, 6 or 8 or even 10, maybe more 3rd rates and maybe some optional 4th rates(they were falling in desuse). I will just throw some numbers trying to justify my point: Imagine something like 1st rates BR would be around 950 ( in order to prevent only Oceans, these could have the 950 while the Santissima 850 and the victory 800, to incentive the use of the last 2),. The 2nd rates should be costy in BR but less than the 1st. Maybe something around 700. They are not supposed to be the most numerous of the SOLs. Now to incentive a huge number of 3rd rates, these could have a BR arund 400. 4rth rates do not need a greater incentive compared to the 3rd. What i wish to say is that we could try to manipulate these BRs to make us search for several strategic choices while having the incentive to close more to the beautiful feeling of the Age of sail in a historical aproach. However not forbidding or preventing less historical choices if someone wishes to try them. That what if. Another sugestion i would like to say is about the PBs mechanics. I think the 3 circles are an excelent idea and these could represent the disembark points for the attacker force. The main at the center can be the port assault point. the other 2 could represent points to disembark the marines in the coast or beach to make the siege to the city/port. Points granted by the capture of each of these secondary circles could be half of the main port circle. The port should have the best defenses. Now what i think would bring a greater feeling for realism. A ship to capture a circle should be completely stop. This would represent the ship disembarking the marines in small boats. It would be wise to do so after dealing with the forts and by beeing imobile they are vulnerable to any other ship attack. Second, what are the ships disembarking? Marines! So in order for the vessel to be able to capture any circle he must have Marines inside. A slot of the ship knowlege should be used to this. A ship that doesnt bring marines is there only to shoot his cannons, cannot capture. And for further helping the balance of the use of ships. A SOL can take much more marines than a 5th rate. So a 1st should be the ship that could capture the circle faster while a 5th would capture much slower. My doubt is about the unrated vessels. they could transport too few marines to influence the land battle. Should they not be allowed to capture circles or maybe they could capture only the main port circle in a very slow pace. I say this because unrated would have few marines but also few small boats to disembark. Instead they themselves could be the disembark ship heading directly to the docks of the port for the assault but to head directly to the beach or shores would not be a wise idea. Finaly, an intersting idea for a issue that was also mentioned. When the attacker sinks most or all the defender ships but still fails to capture the land. In this situation i would like to sugest some more deeper changes to the PBs. This means the defender kept the port but lost control of the sea to the attacker. I would like to sugest this situation to become a Blockade. This could be mean that another PB is scheduled to the nest day! And if something i think is unlikely to happen but can happen...Happen? What if the attacker managed to capture the land and port but lost most or all of his ships? This would be a interesting turn of events: The attacker holds the port now but lost control of the sea, so this port is under blockade and a new PB scheduled to thenext day but this time the former defender is the attacker and former attacker is the defender. For this to be measured we could have the BR numbers seen in deep waters PBs from and only from the SOL (4th to 1st rates) or should the 5th rates also count and be generic to deep and shallow waters? where only the unrated would not count? If the BR of one side would be superior to the other by more than 50% the posibility of a blockade would arise. To avoid endless situations, Blockades would be limited to 3. This means at the 3rd day of consecutive blockade PBs attackers and defenders are exaust and must retreat. the one who kept the port won. I would like to know what do you think about these ideas and if anyone could even fine tune them. My goals were to achieve more historical and realistic balance to decrease the total dominance of the Oceans in the PB, seek more balanced PB fleets where the 3rd rate would be dominant, fto feel the PB strategy more realistic about the circles and the importance of the SOL to the main objective in a PB that is to capture the port, to simulate the disembark and the advantage of the numbers of the marines in each vessel and finaly the feeling of the sea control introducing the blockade. Thank you.
  5. Zorion

    Stern rake and damage model

    Stern rake doesn´t seem weak to me. Pehraps a matter of opinion or personal interests but to me it may even seem a bit too powerful. A bad angle and it may seem weak, as it should but in a good angle, to me it seems that sometimes it is too powerful. A large ship can measure about 40 or 50 meters and if i am not mistaken, i saw rakes where at the distance of about 2 large vessels, a rake withy grape can be devastating in game. I do believe grape should not be so effective at 100 mts. at less than 50mts i would think it would be a absolute nightmare to the enemy deck, if marines were getting ready to board. Also, pehraps a 5th rate rake should not be so effective to a SOL as it is in game at present time. A rake made by a SOL to another SOL at short range could be devastating and well... A SOL against a 5th rate would only need a broadside to be devastating. As for the moral, absoluly a good sugestion. I would love to see it. To sink the vessel, i also agree with your sugestion, leaks (enough to win the pumps) and boarding then deciding to scuttle. I would add fire (out of control and maybe the explosion).
  6. Zorion

    Why not have sailing in the OW?

    Definitely something i would like very much to have in NA. I do remember when i first sailed on the OW to question why the game had such an arcade sailing. This and another question i had. Mind that i used to play Uncharted Water Online and there i would sail from Europe to China, a journey taking about 4 to 6 hours each leg and depending on the stops. In this we had to manage and make decisions on something i did and still do miss in this game. We had to manage the water, food and amunitions for the journeys. This and choosing how many crew for each vessel. A trader could chose the minimum crew to max the profict and reduce expenses in salary (i would imagine pirates do no pay salary, instead should share the loot of the raids) and water and food consumption. this would have the down side of taking the risk to be a easy prey for a pirate due to the low crew number. A captain aiming for battle could choose the full crew. More expensive and less days at sea but better fit for battle.
×