Guest Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Since swedes keeps bringing it up in every single tribunal thread they can, I thought I'd may try to alleviate some of the hurt, anguish and butt-groping they've been feeling lately.. Enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liq Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 13 hours ago, Anolytic said: I don't need to imagine this as a hypothetical scenario. This happened to REDS at Nassau after the bugged NPC-raids weekend (yeahyeah, they say they weren't bugged, but a week later they were fixed so). An alt-clan tried to take Nassau and do just that, something admin had said explicitly was just fine: So why should there be different rules when Sweden is the affected party 2 weeks later? Fair point, thing is it did Not happen to them as they managed to re flip it as reds. Now one could argue about the probability of there being a tribunal, had the DK-russian alt clan Managed to flip nassau. Anyway this issue seems fixed now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, Liq said: Fair point, thing is it did Not happen to them as they managed to re flip it as reds. Now one could argue about the probability of there being a tribunal, had the DK-russian alt clan Managed to flip nassau. Anyway this issue seems fixed now. We'd still be able to flip it with a russian alt clan. Let's imagine that DK/NG is at war with russia, we'd be able to flip a danish-norwegian port with a russian alt clan, take it and keep it. That wouldn't be against the rules.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liq Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 11 minutes ago, Lars Kjaer said: We'd still be able to flip it with a russian alt clan. Let's imagine that DK/NG is at war with russia, we'd be able to flip a danish-norwegian port with a russian alt clan, take it and keep it. That wouldn't be against the rules.. Still messed up IMHO and surprised this is considered OK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, Liq said: Still messed up IMHO and surprised this is considered OK No argument there. But you have to admit that the Remedios case is different, and to some extent worse simply because it prevents any PBs at all. That being said, neither is acceptable imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Protagonist Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Lars Kjaer said: No argument there. But you have to admit that the Remedios case is different, and to some extent worse simply because it prevents any PBs at all. That being said, neither is acceptable imo. yeah, there seems to be a lot of unsportsmanlike and unsportsmanlike-adjacent behavior going on with plenty of tribunal reports on all sides. i think in an all-out war, that's pretty typical anolytic's post is the first i've seen where the reporter demands specific punishment for the offense. which seems preposterous considering that the devs patched out the ability to do what they did (acknowledging that it's a bad mechanic that people shouldn't be able to use) but no one who participated was punished to my knowledge that's just the opinion of a b-rate swerg foot soldier though 😅 Edited March 13, 2020 by Dirty Protagonist clarification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rear End of Sauron Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redman29 Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 (edited) I truly wonder if the people throwing all the mud on the tribunal post clearly understand how bad this can get if this is allowed. You could essentially lock down countless front lines all over the map by just having another nation generate a port battle and no show it. Regardless of how you feel about Russia, Sweden, Truxillo, San Juan, and all the other BS; this could get very bad very quickly and shut down RVR among numerous front lines. Edited March 14, 2020 by Redman29 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Staunberg🇩🇰 said: I doubt it will get bad. Honnestly who want to days after days do hostillity, to put a port on a lock down? Might change if they change the lock down to a week, but even then I doubt it will happen. If the swedes lose Plymouth I wouldn't mind. Just to give the russians every chance to take Oranjestadt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 2 hours ago, Staunberg🇩🇰 said: Oh you would. You cried like a little Girl Yesterday, when I asked you just to do one little hostillity mission. PvE just dosen’t agree with you. But do it a lot, Well maybe you get addicted to it again. Maybe you should Call your sponsor. You are my "PvE addiction aid" sponsor.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rear End of Sauron Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Lars Kjaer said: If the swedes lose Plymouth I wouldn't mind. Just to give the russians every chance to take Oranjestadt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 14, 2020 Share Posted March 14, 2020 14 minutes ago, The Rear End of Sauron said: That's actually not half bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrago Posted March 20, 2020 Share Posted March 20, 2020 On 3/14/2020 at 5:11 AM, The Rear End of Sauron said: And I thought my family reunions were unpleasant. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now