Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

The Rear End of Sauron

Ensign
  • Posts

    230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Rear End of Sauron

  1. the beatings from admin will continue until morale improves!!!
  2. chain them first whether they are loki or AI usually loki players join in several minutes after the battle has started with all the improvements that can be made to this game this (in my opinion) isn't high on the list of priorities since several practical solutions using existing game mechanics have been suggested
  3. again, don't want the chance of 2 loki runes, don't attack 2 ships - or if you attack 2-3 chain them both down if you want to attack more than 2, accept the risk this isn't a difficult concept it's basic risk vs. reward mechanics that are standard in almost every mmo out there put another way 1 vs 8 of your choice PvE is VERY different to 1 vs 8 PvP not of your choice so please stop drawing comparisons of 'it's combat also ty
  4. nope - you want to farm multiple ships at the same time to block others from joining/contesting, finish off PvE missions for combat marks, which are used to claim things in the PvP reward section of the admiralty house in nation port take away the combat marks of the rewards for PvE farming missions and i agree with you - 1 Loki or even no Loki but you are wanting little to no risk PvE to speed earn combat marks - risk vs reward want less risk? earn them slower, take on 2-3 ships at a time - taking on 7-12 ships it isn't being forced upon you - it is a CHOICE that YOU are making cheers!
  5. if you CHOOSE to fight 7,8 or more ships then ACCEPT some of the potential consequences farming PvE on a PvP server doesn't mean little to no risk especially when often the larger fleets are tagged to deny another player enetering on the other side, and often close to port under the safety of your own forts etc
  6. upon entering battle with AI simply chain down the sails of each AI ship before starting to try to sink or cap them if somebody enters the AI ship(s) via Loki runes they cannot chase you effectively since they have no repairs end of problem
  7. perfect example of BOCAR propaganda - ty sir!
  8. just calling out BS and lies you are more than welcome to join in the part of the discussion of me proving what Staunberg stated was wrong rather than adding more lies and BS to the thread?
  9. you cannot say that BOCAR tried to always keep it out of every possible mechanics thread, when BOCAR initiated mechanics threads with their propaganda quick lesson: al·ways -1.at all times; on all occasions:"the sun always rises in the east"synonymsevery time, each time, at all times, all the time, on every occasion tried in this usage = past tense of try try -1.make an attempt or effort to do something: so BOCAR did NOT attempt or put in effort to "always" keep it out of mechanics threads - the example of Lars from BOCAR clearly illustrates that ask Lars to explain the grammar to you - he is a teacher
  10. typical BOCAR propaganda BS and lies as usual - not only did you not keep it out of mechanics threads, BOCAR STARTED mechanics threads with it if you want i can post a screenshot of Lars from BOCAR stating how his mission was to ruin the gaming experience of every single Swedish player
  11. i answered not sure because i want to see what the new hostility mechanics are about i have a feeling that they are basically shifting the opportunity to have larger scale OW pvp from screening to hostility and i want to wait to see if that is the case, and if so whether it is a success or a fail
  12. there is a fault with your poll after clicking "No" for question 1 it won't accept my answer unless i reply to questions 2 and 3 also, which if my answer is "NO" should not be required questions?
  13. Great to see you back - SLRN was my first clan when the game launched RvR back in 2016
  14. actually i DID accept your statement that a leaderboard doesn't show the whole truth - perhaps you were too busy sucking on mommy russia's teats to notice?
  15. swedes had WAY fewer ports when NATO formed (i don't think spain was in it at the time though i could be mistaken - if they were they didn't have many ports either at the time after the Russians beat them down to nothing) - dutch had a good number of ports but were already crippled with many pvp clans already left - they had ports but not enough pvp'ers to defend them and funny when i showed the leaderboard showing how outnumbered we were (about a month or so ago) YOU were the one saying it was misleading and inaccurate lol - much love to you - mwaaaah baby!
  16. lol - i'll take some of whatever it is you're smoking the NATO alliance wasn't close in numbers to the Russo/US/Danish/Dutch one again, facts not speculation my friend
  17. i think it can be generally agreed upon that anybody that takes on Russia is taking the underdog role perhaps you need to be reminded that at the time when HAVOC flipped from Danes to Sweden, Sweden had less ports than Denmark and the majority of Danes didn't want to RvR tough to argue against facts but keep telling yourself otherwise
  18. mmm - i never said it was invalid - my words were "BSTD/Danes played a very key role in the strategy of multiflipping" which is the opposite of "invalid"
  19. main effect BSTD and danes had was by helping russia multiflip many ports against sweden to where it wasn't logistically possible for us to defend against them all (which is why we took the danish ports as buffer ports) so whereas BSTD/Danes played a very key role in the strategy of multiflipping i never considered you guys as "fighting" - yes you ganked some of our hostility fleets etc - most fights for ports you lost unless we couldn't send full attack fleets or defend because other ports had priority i look forward to having a nice rivalry with the Danes over Hat Island and see which nation comes out with bragging rights in the end it was great fun fighting the Ruissians (ty to you all again) and less than mediocre "fighting" the Danes
  20. i for one will ALWAYS be at war with Russia because i enjoy the underdog role i look forward to a break in the daily PB commitment for a bit, and i look forward immensely to a new campaign at some point
  21. GG russians - many of the pb's were a ton of fun - ty for that many of us in sweden (myself included) need to take a break from the daily port battles commitment though we were never a zerg it was a tribute to us that our comparatively far smaller numbers were often considered such by others i am sure after some recuperation we'll be back to have another fun campaign! thanks for all the fish p.s. one thing you can be assured of is that you won't be seeing me crying for months on the forums that we don't have a 55 point crafting port
  22. whines about timer dodging has opportunity to set PB for whenever he wants sets it during a "timer dodging" time and doesn't show up enough said - rest is just danes crying the same old song @lars on a non game related note i sincerely hope ya get better mate
  23. where we differ is we don't have a problem with them setting a timer for when works for them - it is their right
  24. lol - you guys are starting to look like a joke read his question carefully - it states that sweden are hiding behind port timers for ports that are close to CS and what can admin do about it sweden has port timer for you at viques that meets all of yoiur requiremnts and still you cry what you really are asking is "can we force sweden to have PB timers at times that work for denmark, not sweden, so that denmark can coordinate with russia to set multiflips that sweden has no chance of defending them all" if you are sincere in wanting a PB at a port close to CS that is at a timer that you can choose, then you have it - Viques - which having an open timer (screenshot above) you set at a time of your choosing, not ours otherwise seriously, stfu and stop the crying see you there
×
×
  • Create New...