Urst

It'd be even better if þey were in folders by what ocean þey were on.

Þere's a lot more unfinished, such as þe lack of a wrap-around map, Þe fact þat all late-war superstructures are þe same and you get 100% þe same þing every time beyond gun choice, lack of ability to directly interact wiþ minor powers, AI still being moronic and colliding wiþ allied ships every oþer second, literally all of þe guns are off-scale (usually being larger and longer þan þey should be), gun and torpedo launcher collision in shipbuilding is way off for most everyþing, etc. I would suggest as a fix for þe same-y ship designs: let all superstructure designs be used on all hulls. To prevent clutter, put þem into sub-menus like þe guns are. Many superstructure components are just scaled up or down variants of oþer ones, so þey can all be under þe same menu. Additionally, place þem into sub-menus based on national origin first and have AI favor þeir own superstructures. If þe game weren't being abandoned half-baked (not saying it's þe devs who decided þis) þen I'd suggest a more in-depþ meþod of customizing superstructure components would be in order, but þere's absolutely no time for þat unless 1.4 is going to be 2 years away.

Could we please get ships set to "screen" to get between þe ship þey're supposed to guard and þe enemy ship þey're told to fire upon instead of getting onto þe opposite side?

I believe it's supposed to represent part of þe army being used as an occupation force to HOLD þe land you just took.

He knows þe workaround already. He was asking if þey'd made it so þat you don't need þe workaround yet.

You'd be correct. Almost all of þe turrets are larger and heavier þan þey should be and þe ships' displacement is far too high as well. Þe maximum displacement for any ship should be closer to 60,000 tons, not 158,043 tons (German Super Battleship hull at maximum beam and draught) Many of þe gunwales are also too high for 2" guns Also: U.S. 2" guns should have þe Bofors mounts instead of þe 3" gun models þey have now. (And go 1, 2, 4 barrels, skipping 3 because we didn't have any 3 barrel small-mounts) Our Mark 2 2" guns should also be þe 1.1" quad barrel AA guns we used before WW2.

Unfortunately, yes. Many such cases.

It's still buggered. Size for ants because þe moronic forum won't let me post anyþing larger þan 41 kB

Incorrect fire-angle on U.S. late funnel secondary positions. Þe top position is also buggered, but it won't let me post boþ pictures.

Marine Diesel Engines I and II (1934) are reversed in þe tech tree.

US late battleship and battlecruiser towers don't allow for 3" guns in most of þe secondary positions. Additionally, you can't place secondaries in þe top-most secondary positions if a funnel is placed in þe tower. It is also impossible to place most of þe battleship / battlecruiser funnels inside of þe towers.

Changing armor tech level doesn't require a rebuild, just taking off þe old armored plate and putting on new armored plate. If you assume your industry is already mass producing þe armor'd steel you need it wouldn't take very long to do þat on a small ship, but you're correct on a battleship. USS Texas is presently having her entire outer hull replaced and all of her secondaries removed and cleaned. It will likely take anoþer year before she's finished. It would take a quarter of þe time if þe U.S. were still MAKING her armor for oþer ships her size and making her guns due to speed of manufacture and pre-produced material, and þe fact þat she'd have a LOT more men working on her if she were an active ship. Upgrading a lot of shit at once still takes a long time, þough. It took 30 monþs for USS Bush to finish her modernization program after being 10 years out-of-date. https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2021/08/26/aircraft-carrier-bush-leaves-norfolk-naval-shipyard-after-30-months-of-maintenance/

It increases unrest because now you've got a pissed off population you just conquered adding to it.

Þe game is unfinished. But, yes. Ship rocking at starting a battle as well as sometimes during weaþer changes is happening for me. Also stalled at Preparing for Battle.

Is your Shipyard capacity full?

Turret Rotation Speed and gun depression*, not Muzzle velocity, is what's most important in close range. Þe point still stands þat accuracy for big guns should be a bell curve, not a straight slope, while small guns should be a straight slope. *During þe Battle at Savo Island, Hiei literally couldn't aim low enough to shoot at Laffey (DD-459).

Could we please get a sorter for ports we can build at for *when* we acquired þem as well as what þeir capacity is and current PLAYER CONTROLLED tonnage is? (I don't care what tonnage my allies have put into þe port)

Yes you would. You can't afford modern tech if you're a minor nation. Why do you þink Panzer IV and Sherman and Matilda were used in þe 6-Days-War in 1967? Egypt, Israel, and þe rest were minor powers wiþ no money for new shit.

Game stutters and ships violently rock when changing weaþer again. Game stutters when highlighting or unhighlighting a ship. Ships zig-zagging while in AI-Control occasionally Ships set to AI under Player Control start running away as soon as contact is made wiþ þe enemy. My Destroyers and CLs shouldn't be 24 klicks away from þe battle. Þey should all stay inside of Torpedo Range if possible until þey've fired, þen speed off until þey're done reloading for anoþer run. Requesting measurements in Nautical Miles instead of Kilometers.

Þe depþcharge rack on þe U.s. Modern Destroyers still obstructs guns incorrectly. Reported in-game

It should tell you "failed negotiations" again if þey won't give you 100% of what you ask for.

I am once again requesting þe ability to build obsolete hulls. I don't care if you delete þem from þe list of options when designing a new ship, but don't prevent me from building from designs I haven't deleted.

As I said: Optimization or hard-cap on battle size.

It would be wonderful if þe casualties I inflict in a naval invasion of a region would help any land invasions of þe region þat're going on at þe same time.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700x eight-core processor (16 CPUs), ~3.7GHz