Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Raxius

Members2
  • Posts

    121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Raxius

  1. your clearly delusional. i helped in coastguard so i could pvp and because you wouldnt. you never commanded a single portbattle that i was in infact there wasn't one. i was trolling US players regarding charged escort because they ask for help when attacked and do not adapt nor help other traders when attacked so i found a market - i thought US was a free economy. what you dont know is before u were ever in US on EU after the server merge i had retaken saint mary's from the brits i had pushed int the bahama;s and tried to help a fair amount of players i am no saint but i went above and beyond to help the US. and i DO NOT want fame fortune or anything from the US other than to be left alone from drama. speak with broadsides not with words.. this type of vocal warfare is boring.
  2. i dont blame anyone for me leavin the US nation - it was a clan decision and hold nothing personal to US other than insults directed at me and my clan. its a sore way to treat a player leaving nation. it allows me to understand why some players quit the game instead of changing nation.
  3. i get that - we did want to attack san mateo and san agustin but the US was obsessed with the bahama's and empty pb's. - as for own teamspeak. we have learned that and now use our own discord in french nation. the problem with attacking san agustin and san mateo was the BR limit our clan would have to rely on others - and san sebastion (whilst US) and ays and any encounter with large BR proved difficult for our clan to work with others, either others couldnt keep up with us or we couldnt adapt to others play style so i see the perception and understand it. so i understand the frustration but we are only attacking ports to generate a fight. we will keep grinding until we get a good one or two. then we will move on i dont want to render US without any capurable ports but that is up to the US. i like fighting the US because yes we have experience and skill but US has numbers and fighting a group 3x your number is a good challenge regardless of player skill and thats why we do it.
  4. at the moment france is drama free - christendom if you plan to come to france- keep me out of all drama please. genuine request.
  5. we should create a rax thread on forum - may be busier then development news at this rate ^^. we do fight others too had a good fight vs BF clan in 1st rates and will continue to fight across the map it is true we are focused on US coast because US nation continues to throw salt and are very vocal about it. @Cabral brits arent doing that i ignore batman as a rule would never take a thief seriously (ROYAL CWH hoard). who knows what goes on in future we look to have some nice fights with better opponents once our US campaign is complete.
  6. we are not joining any team, and actaully it would be good to do fleet practice with some of these guys in france but the reason we lost to them was false odds. we had a lot of caebears on our side which stupidly i relied on. lack of intellect on my part but we have moved forward
  7. there was. the constant moving into our channels. asking us to help all the time an if we refused then we were insulted. aint got time for that nonsense in france we have a language barrier and the nation is more flexible to allow for our type of clan.
  8. VCO delclared themselves as a free state - good on them. UWS is not so different we help france if it benefits us but we arent really part of any internal organisation we are privateers in france with one goal. create content to sharpen our skills and improve as we go. its a nice goal it is proving to be fun and soon maybe even challenging we have fought the danes the other day and i was impressed with my clan mates. later we may go on to fight more skilled opponents time will tell. i went back on the agreement to not sink US by overhearing your senate meeting and constantly seeing my name and the hate crime on your nation chat. figured you didnt DESERVE a break. so sorry for being human ^^
  9. i dont think trying to bait me to attack others helps you. its a casual tactic vulnerable nations use. we attack who we want trying to insult me and bait me to attack another wont work. i like fighting the US it helps my own clan members improve we are at different skill levels in the clan and fighitng the US will help us level out. when we get tired of fedup of sinking US we will move on like all others do. just fight us rather then use words to avoid a fight. i appreciate you wont defend below cabo. thats fine no problem infact we will go north
  10. would of been nice. though since its neutral now after the take ill keep timer off and free for all for the US to attempt to reclaim it when they feel they are ready and willing.
  11. unlike CSA - ports i take wont be hindered by timers they will be free for all no timer.. attack if you want provide ME CONTENT
  12. later PB timers in attempt to further deny content??? wont work i can logon anytime for pb so i would prefer it if you set it on your prime time to allow for a good battle not a late night scandal your players certainly wont enjoy that. me on the otherhand i am happy to attack at any time you choose
  13. we are happy for you to come to Nouvelle orleans and pvp - it will help you get better at pvp. no issues there look forward to the generation of content... second making ports neutral instead of fighting a fair fight only proves you wish to deny content or are scared to fight us. thats not cool the defender has advantage in a portbattle and its equal BR why not jus fight it out?? im glad you mentioned what you will defend because in future thats what i WILL attack. i dont want life to be salty the sea is full of it already i want content and you make a fine provider so lets cut the forum nonsense jump in a ship an defend your port :)) US is not my only target and i look forward to having content with every other nation at some point but dont complain we are attacking US.. the way i see it.. why not????
  14. i have enough respect for VCO remaining to keep this thread relevant the purpose of my responses was to clarify false information and try to retract a genuine thread from turning into a slam rax hammer - i have not responded to the insults ive endured here nor will i, its childish and pointless. please keep information here relevant to VCO becoming a free state perhaps a mod will be kind to clean this. i wish VCO luck as a free state i tried it in the US before being pulled into the politics system i really do wish them luck regardless of their thoughts towards me or mine toward them. it is however unfortunate that this is an attempt within the US nation as i fear like me they will get dragged into the nonsense of the senate or self proclaimed leaders. but please guys if you want to troll me or request information from me please contact me directly you prove false intent when you write behind people's backs. Rax
  15. u asked us to defend carteghena, we did u asked for support in the council as they were stroppy on taxes. you asked for support in the gulf at apalachicola and so on. am i missing something? did i ask for support at bluefields, did i ask ahoy to help with anything? no. cabal was doing pvp in bluefields and canalete against BIG yes. they lost as much as we did and both clans learned in pvp as result. i wouldnt say we did more damage to them nor would i say they did more to us it was a good experience regardless. you dont learn by fighting newbies so cabal was a good opportunity for us. yes i hunt US players now who some would deem newbs if rear admiral is newb then yes im guilty of that but when a nation does not want to learn they are not newbs they are noobs and yes i enjoy hunting those till the sun goes down because its interesting to watch how many times they make the same mistakes. it is also good to farm them in order for the less experienced players in my clan to learn. i am blamed and laid to global trolls daily for doing the same stuff you yourself do banished as do so many others. i think the difference between us is i am honest and i am willing to turn a newb into a pro something many people have serious issues with understanding. i succeed i fail regardless i try which is more than i can say for the US nation. secondly banished do not point at me for making remarks at AHOY wasnt i defending AHOY when we were in GB? something changed in you when you went pirate and magically forgot who helped you along the way. the difference between us is i have a larger memory nothing else.
  16. it is interesting to see how a forum topic regarding free state clans.. turns into a slam rax hammer. very interesting. all i see here is fallen enemies or past allies upset and crying because iv'e left them in the dust as hachi correctly mentioned if they aint good enough after sometime accept them as trash and move forward. @Batman whilst i was in GB i attended more pb's than you defended kpr more than you and contributed to GB more than you what gives you right to even mention me? @Banished Privateer when i was also GB i helped AHOY upon request and we worked well together until both our clans decided enough was enough an left for Pirates. @Christendom we decided to leave US because too many were trying to lean on us which is not what we wanted as i told you. you can call us bad.. toxic.. it does not change history. now we are in france yes. has absolutely nothing to do with you and we hope in the french nation we will be able to clean ourselves from the sticky mess you call pvp... o7 dibbler hope to see you on the game again if anyone ever wants to see how i play or in anyway work with me please speak to me and think for yourselves dont listen to past time crybabies. Rax
  17. @adminfrom this it seems you want to make 2 types of economy both crafting for income and also rvr/pvp/events for income.. please detail whats preventing this system from turning out like the previous tobacco plantation system? lets not go in circles.
  18. i agree, i dont see why instances dont remain open indefinately. it does 2 things stops raiders from hiding from the 3 minute rule an a whole fleet trapped outside helpless. and it will also rely on players communicating with their nation/clan to receive support in such circumstances but if this was the case then the safezone should be rank restricted and would be pointless for players who are in a clan or responsive nation. safezones would only then really help clanless and/or solo casual players ( i am not against this but i am not sure if this is the diretion the community want the game to go in). personally i would like all battle instances to remain open it makes things interesting an every battle willl certainly contain action.
  19. this is not a problem AI fleets offer higher reward than combat orders and therefore a risk must be included to keep said "better drops" more rare/expensive. captains knew the risks of the sea's and in truth no reward without risk. i think its fine as it is
  20. @admin this patch is extremely promising and is enough encouragement for players to learn the combat mechanics of the game. this patch has clearly been thought out well and as long as patches keep competing with this level of improvement i will not regret my positive steam review. good stuff Rax (and yes i am US now, for those trollers who love to know where i am and what i do) :))
  21. i think this thread should remain related to the subject/topic. and it was a request for an update not a demand. your post here batman is pointless. you are not even relating to the issue.
  22. the United states left the battle long before we engafed the Locean in boarding and was graped below 400 crew (340) vs 1100 crew. and 4 other russian ships stern raking etc. please keep this thread factual as its clear the result of the battle in the absence of the bug. devs any update on ship replacement?
  23. to be fair the locean would of been boarded by russians as the boarding process was triggered an he was surrounded by 5 1st rates. and he was down less than 50% crew. so please remove the pvp marks rudi has gained and please replace the santisima's the locean would of been sunk regardless.
  24. hello support, please look at these screenshots. we were boarding a L'Ocean and both santisima's flipped 100m apart through the air and upside down in the ocean. as a result we have lost both santisima's and we killed the locean as all 3 ships flipped out. please replace our santisima's as this is a clear undenyable bug. Santisima 1: Player name: Sam121252 upgrades: french rig refit, carteghena caulking, navy structure refit. cannons: Long 42, Long 24, Long 12 and 42pd carro. Santisima 2: Player name: Raxius upgrades: Navy Structure refit, french rig refit cannons: Long 42 Long 24 Long 12 carro's 42pd. please replace these ships and fix the collision bug which causes 1st rates to instantly fly through the air and sink. please reply promptly, Raxius
  25. perhaps PVP server should do a vote.. on what they want. my suggestion.. is simple restrict safezones to a specific rank (eg post captain) all ranks above would have completed tutorial by then and be used to game mechanics and therefore should not be protected by AI reinforced safezone of multiple 1st rates. second rule is captains above post captain that are attacked in CAPITAL AREA (so the inner safezone) there battles remain open indefinately for more players to join as word of the attack spreads throughout the nation. the attacker cannot be reinforced in this instance but the defender can. the reason behind this idea is to allow players incentive to use other coastlines of the map and not remain restricted in the protected zones. the current issue is too many players including veterans remain in the safezone to completely avoid PVP why should this be a mechanic on a PVP server? players complain to me about there low ranks being sunk , the problem is that the veterans are amongst the new players so they are caught in the firing line. one thing is clear.. server pop has made this problem worse and players are encouraged to remain in protected areas which only reduces content and makes pvp hunting silly taask as if you are pvping alone.. be expected to always fighr 10+ players.. is this the direction naval action wants to take in its pvp content?
×
×
  • Create New...