RaimundoJoe
-
Posts
480 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by RaimundoJoe
-
-
Maybe, this is the new best way to deal damage in the patrol zone? Does this counts as damage done?
-
3 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:
Sadly you spend more time on forums than in game, but every game needs forum warriors. Keep up the good work! Toss some more insults at me, puny tiny little srupl, it will make you feel better
Give me a medal then!
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:
Raimundo aka jealousME, my old clan mate, I want to apologize for leaving you in GB nation, seems like it caused to you irreparable damage brain.
The 'irreparable damage' i have, its caused by Naval Action, then again i don't play as much as u are. So, my slow little srupl, whatever i have, you have much more of it!
-
27 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:
@RaimundoJoe you seem very butthurt and salty, did I hurt you so much and deeply?
No man, i just know how youre tiny little mind works, and wanted to spare others from youre stupid tricks.
But go ahead, tell us more about youre heroic deeds...
-
7 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:
Ekhm, my dear friend... You joined twice a stronger side against me in patrol, a side with much higher BR. It was a long time ago, but still I see no reason for you to complain.
Are u baiting again, srupl?
U prolly have a tinny coloured picture u want us to see, but first u need a reaction to youre shit talk.
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, Banished Privateer said:
Better keep him as diplo, that means more wars and more fun
Maybe he will by accident attack your nation... I guess that's what you're scared of.
LoL. No man, my nation its more like training ground for this lot, its Sweden they are after, allways was.
-
10 hours ago, Anolytic said:
...
Do you still have @North (North Viking) in there?
If so, better remove his diplo status because his diplomacy ideea is that of a hammer among nails.
-
-
1 hour ago, jodgi said:
Hehe, I look at it this way; They don't know what they want or are conflicted.
When presented with the IDEA of loss: "This is great! It gives meaning and depth to the game."
When presented with in-game loss: "This is terrible! This will drive me and everyone else away from the game!"
I dont give a shit about pixel loss, i dont even trade so much, i dislike the ideea of picking on the weak one all the time. Last time was carebears, removed all safety and left them with a trapp called 'safe zone'. Now let's destroy traders life!
@jointventure what do you think about this planned change? It's about trading more or less...
-
34 minutes ago, Sir Hethwill the RedDuke said:
Devs, no eco upgrade needed. Stop development at once !
Man, u are strange!
Tell me sir, how is killing taders helping the game economy?
Or, in what way forcing a trader to put up a weak fight, with each one of its fleet ships, helps the game economy?
How does trading with one ship, instead of tree or four, is going to improve the game economy?
Inserting grief, then make small and slow improvments, that's what is all about this game!
-
Or maybe, 500 are way to manny players. Lets try 'less is more'!
Maybe ...
-
Its a lot easier, to write a few code lines and create some real content. Insted u chase away even more players. Great stuff!
If there is such a big need to make traders a target, why not involve them in the conquest game? Have them transport diffrent materials to places that are under attack.
-
1
-
-
I read a few time, in this tread, that we are supposed to be testers. I suggest another word 'sponsor'.
-
3 minutes ago, rediii said:
What are u if not confused?
-
22 minutes ago, Batman said:
And I go balls deep, always!
a dildo has no balls...little man
-
10 minutes ago, Batman said:
No need for this. GA will visit French ports soon.
That's coz u are such a dildo!
-
34 minutes ago, Old Crusty said:
In my experience with the game, the player experience and ranks needs a lot of work.
Two reasons for this. Once you can sail a Bellona, experience comes quickly and so do the next couple of ranks and all of a sudden before you know it, you are at maximum experience. The other reason is that the current rank system makes it so you can skip over a lot of ships without ever needing to sail them. For example the current system you can skip the Frigate/Belle Poule and then a rank later completely skip all 4rh rates. Currently a new player will spend triple the time grinding to sail a big 5th rate, then they will grinding from that 5th rate to maximum game experience. And if those new players complete the tutorial and final exam, it takes even less time to get to maximum experience and sailing the biggest 1st rate in game.
I propose adding two additional ranks and almost doubling the experience needed to get to maximum. This is a rough draft.
1. Crew 40 0 Exp
2. Crew 60 300 exp
3. Crew 120 600 exp
4. Crew 160 1200 exp.
5. Crew 240 2500 exp.
6. Crew 300 4500 exp.
7. Crew 400 8000 exp.
8. Crew 500 15000 exp.
9. Crew 650 25000 exp.
10. Crew 850 50000 exp.
11. Crew 1100 75000 exp.
12. Crew 1400 150000 exp.while writing out these ranks I thought that maybe adding a thirteenth rank would be good so that someone sailing a Santisima could have a Frigate or two in fleet to help prevent being jumped by smaller ships and stern camped.
All thoughts on this matter, positive and negative, are greatly appreciated.
Old Crusty
-
1
-
-
Now i have a clear ideea about the 'Additional Ballast' uppgrade!
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, Flash Jack said:
The game you used to play was simple and easy. Now it's realistic and hard....
Hahaha...
Realistic and hard, 🤣🤣🤣
-
Who is the coward now SruPL?
-
@adminHave a look at this, were will it stop?
-
Promises...promises...
-
This ship its messed upp!
-
1
-
-
LoL, actually its the grief to happiness ratio. 1/8
😁/😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Pyrat Political Situation
in Caribbean News
Posted
WTF is a 'pyrat' ?
Google says this