Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Jorge

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,229

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Jorge

    Desde cuando se atacan a los compañeros de una misma faccion

    in Naval Action - Spanish language

    Posted

    45 minutes ago, CeltiberoClearco said:

    Gaizka, con animo constructivo bien sabes que en las reuniones que mantuvimos se acordó que todos abrieramos outpost en Santiago-Salamanca y más pronto que tarde en Cartagena. En el primer ataque a Santiago no bajó NADIE que no fuera de VLTRA. Absolutamente nadie si quitamos a un par de valientes sin clan, en naves pequeñas y que se la jugaron siguiendo las instrucciones de batalla. Por cierto, 10 minutos después de la batalla sus CM estaban a la venta en LH.

    Ya, desde el principio: "si os he visto no me acuerdo y las naves os las jugais vosotros que a mi me da risa".

    Segunda batalla: Cartagena. Esta vez ni gente sin clan. Solamente fué VLTRA. Por allí no apareció nadie. Y los Holandeses vinieron con Bellonas. Segunda vez que, sin decir absolutamente nada ni antes ni después, son VLTRA quienes se la juegan en solitario.

    Hay una tercera PB abortada, la de Salamanca, pues los britis nos ven los Ocean y desisten de terminar de calentar. En los días de calentamiento y tanteo nadie de la facción apareció por allí. Hubiera sido la 3º batalla de puerto, las 3 en los puertos que habiamos acordado defender TODOS, y en que los VLTRA nos quedamos solos.

    Los VLTRA, que no la faccion española, firman un acuerdo, primero con SORRY y otros clanes, luego con la mayoría de clanes de los EEUU. Estos acuerdos incluyen "calentamientos" pactados. Los VLTRAS se pegan la panzada de calentar puertos y los SORRY nos calientan Santiago.

    Cuarta batalla Isla de los Pinos. Creíamos que iba ir todo el mundo, los VLTRA apenas van unos cuantos y resulta que no se llena la PB.!!!!

    Quinta batalla: Santiago. Para mi personalmente, y no hablo como miembro de VLTRA, es tal el grado de bajeza que se produce en las horas anteriores a la batalla..., que ni siquiera lo voy a comentar aquí. De vergüenza ajena. Demasiado bochorno para exponerlo públicamente. Y no hablo de Lobo.

    Gaizka, quereis CM y participar activamente en el RVR?, el camino es claro: llegar acuerdos con otros clanes para calentar mutuamente regiones. Pero no pretendas que sea VLTRA quien lo acuerde y caliente otro puerto en compensación  para que luego seas tu el bueno de esta película e ir escribiendo textualmente "... pues en mi opinión, cuanta más gente se aproveche mejor para todos. Así no tendrá que ser un solo clan el que haga todo el trabajo"  Joder, Gaizka, esto es de un cinismo demoledor.... y tu no eres Lobo. Tu entiendes de esto.

    Los clanes que asistieron a las reuniones de la facción, os estais quedando tan retrasados como franceses o britanicos... pero no es culpa de VLTRA. Es mas, son esos mismos clanes que han incumplido lo acordado por todos, los que ponen en cuestión los acuerdos de VLTRA con otros.  

    Y encima es VLTRA, que si ha cumplido lo pactado y lo hizo en solitario, quien debe leer un post como el tuyo en el que no das una sola explicación de por que nos habeis dejado solos (traicionado?) ante los enemigos de la facción. sino que encima pareces reclamar unas CM ganadas con el esfuerzo de los demás.

    Yo, y creo que puedo hablar por VLTRA, no tengo ningún problema en mantener otra reunión de la facción... pero esta vez la convocais y organizais vosotros. Y por favor, ir con el animo de cumplir lo pactado.

     

    Edito: Voy a añadir otro detalle. En la primera batalla de Santiago contra los britis y visto lo que se nos venia encima, mas de 60 jugadores britanicos subían desde Jamaica, pdimos ayuda  a todo el mundo. Sabes quien acudió? SORRY.

    Y aun viendo la que se les venía encima, en abrumadora inferioridad y que nosotros no podíamos salir de puerto pues eramos 25, metieron en batalla a todos los britis que pudieron.... se la jugaron, en parte por nosotros, aun sabiendo que no podían detenerlos a todos. OLE SUS COJONES!!!!. Esto son los jugadores que quiero a mi lado en la batalla.

    Amén.

    Desde cuando se atacan a los compañeros de una misma faccion

    in Naval Action - Spanish language

    Posted

    Lobogris, es difícil sorprenderme, pero eres aún más imbécil de lo que creía. 

    Al resto les diré que a ver si se enteran de una vez que el juego en este momento impulsa los tratos entre clanes y eso es lo que hemos hecho.Al que no le gusten simplemente que vayan a defender o atacar el puerto correspondiente. Os aseguro que nadie de VLTRA se va a meter en esa batalla. 

     

     

    • Like 1

    Such is a lord.... part 2

    in News Announcements & Important discussions

    Posted

    2 hours ago, JCDC said:

    yes, we can do that. but isn't it sad that the best solution to a bad mechanic is to exploit another one? one that actively avoids PvP play?

    again, the whole mechanic actively encourages the avoidance of PvP battles. how is 'set fake PB's' a good solution? its mad.

    we just want good RvR with fighting and a fair chance. IF we end up in a bad situation due to events or being beaten then fine, we can adapt tactics as you describe above. but being forced into that corner from day 1 by the game mechanics without ever having lost anything or been beaten or done anything wrong, and having no feasible way out via the point of the game 'naval action' its just clearly wrong.

    This is an Alpha, the whole point is to improve the mechanics and point out faults. so, that's what we are doing. the solution cannot just be denial and 'well its you doing it wrong not the game being wrong'. the point is to fix the problem, not make the players adapt to it.

    I see, You have a lack of memory and can't remember Santiago PB.

    Such is a lord.... part 2

    in News Announcements & Important discussions

    Posted

    2 hours ago, rediii said:

    It's not a exploit. It's a mechanic admins want to be used so the first landowners get set correctly. I dont like it too but you need to set your regions once before you go active into the RvR.

    You were not in this situation from day 1. You got into this situation because you attacked a port once and after you lost you began to do nothing. You could have attacked Sant Iago instantly again so spain wouldnt have many agas. You chose to attack 2 empty regions

    The you had the chance to defend pitts town. You rather sailed hours to a far away port to kill some spanish.

    Then there was grand turk. I don't even know if you attented that but i guess not.

     

    Even now you have multiple solutions to your problems and all you do is complain.

    They attacked Santiago with 23 indefatigables and 2 mortars, we defend with 1 Niágara, 1 surprise, 1 frigate, 1 trinco and 21 indefs.....But we won and got 75 CM. 

    Such is a lord.... part 2

    in News Announcements & Important discussions

    Posted

    2 hours ago, JCDC said:

    Is that the best answer you cant give? you should be a politician. really.

    the problem is the profusion of CMs has lead to huge doom fleets. this problem was predicted. The fact that once you have a doom fleet, you are invincible to those who don't, means that the system massively enforces superiority.

    your solution, is that somehow we get our entire nation to abandon its areas, and run to an area where they cant get us.

    Seriously, we are supposed to make up for bad mechanics by running away rather than addressing them through game design. as if its that simple and the other nations will just leave us alone there, rather than using their vast CM enforced superiority in resources to prevent it.

    WOW

    Once we move our entire nation to the shallow ports, its also not clear to me how we come back from that. we cant build line ships there, we cant move our materials safely from the Bahamas to our capital, which is pirate central. nor can we fight on the open water between Bahamas and KPR as we wont have any big ships. its really a dumb thing to say and you cant possibly think its a good idea, you just say it as a deflection. this is just not realisitic.

    I don't remember any british, americans or dutch  saying the same thing when the British attacked Spanish ports with 2nd and 1st rates and we defended as we could with frigates.

    Luckily for you we aren't like old british nation and we don't want to leave you with only one port. Stop crying, organize and fight.

    • Like 2

    Such is a lord.... part 2

    in News Announcements & Important discussions

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, huliotkd said:

    with my Rat account i grind AI or pvp making gold, then go with a trade ship in a GB port and give all my money  to my ALT acc and taking back CM from GB alt account.

    with the money i craft resources from my GB acc, the i put those resources on shop at cost of 1 gold each and i buy back with my Rat account...

     

    the time you spend farming AI or players with Rat account, gives time to GB account to recharge its LH... 1 acc feeds the other.

     

    so again...what do you find wrong on what i exposed?

    Lol.  

    Or you have 6 hands and 3 pcs, or I don't understand how you just have not conquered several ports by yourself.

    I think you have no idea what you are talking about and if you knew the amount of resources a first rate needs, including a lot of money to get the materials out of the mines and an exaggerated amount of labor hours, you would realize the amount of nonsense you've written.

    • Like 1

    Such is a lord.... part 2

    in News Announcements & Important discussions

    Posted

    47 minutes ago, huliotkd said:

    @admin

    1-WRONG. you need ALT acc because you can participate in ALT nation taking CM from that nation and giving them to the first account. (i'm rat, i have BRIT alt, i take part in a brit PB, win, then give daily my BRIT pension to my RAT account---exploit)

    2-WRONG.

    single player, with 1 ALT, can produce everything for a SOL because he has 10 building slots, double LH, and you devs reduced the diversity of resources needed to produce ships...just introduced the useless marks mechanic, exploited on point 1.  actually you need iron( gives stone, gold, silve, coal), stone (gives iron, gold, silver, coal) , fir (gives compass), hemp, oak (gives compass), coal, lignum.    total 7 resources you can produce and you have 3 free slots wher you can also build Workshop and Shipyard...and 1 slot can be free!!!!! other resources you must collect but are only woods.

    those are numbers for 1 single player with 1 single ALT acc...and we all know there are lots of player with 3-4 ALT ACC...using them.

    3- WRONG.

     

    you created Open World where every nation can produce ALL NEEDED RESOURCES in 3-4 ports (not region) near to capital...to allow everyone the chance to build at least 1 ship...

    so all player can trade near Capital and noone can rob them due to little time a player can go from a port to the nearest.

     

    @admin what do you think of my gameplay mechanic?

    All WRONG....

    • Like 1

    Such is a lord.... part 2

    in News Announcements & Important discussions

    Posted

    2 hours ago, JCDC said:

    @admin

    On the day this patch landed I and several others warned that it would cause gross CM inflation and bring back the old problem of having swarms of lineships. combined with the fact it happened after some nations had already expanded, and thus would get no marks, and others had ample easy opportunity to do so.

    So now, we have the situation where several nations have fleets of L'oceans. this is insane, I don't know how they got the resources so fast, but they now have unbeatable doom fleets. The whole point of the reset and the new game rules was to restrict the spamming of 1st rates, yet, it has already happened because you gave our conquest marks like candy.

    It might be worth wondering how its physically possible to build so many 1st so quickly, I don't understand the sort of economy that would allow that in terms of resource production, labour hours and money etc. perhaps there is some exploit that wasn't caught just like the war supplies one, or perhaps they have an army of alts. who knows.

    To make matters worse, the side who has the line ships is now unbeatable, so the side that doesn't have them can now never get more because its not possible to win a port battle when you have a few Aggamemnons and the odd Bellona against a fleet of lineships. This patch/mechanic has created a situation where power is MASSIVELY self re-enforcing, to the point of invincibility. Spain probably gets 5-10x the number of CMs per day as Britain, and has a fleet that is maybe 10x as powerful. there is no coming back from that.

     

    Its totally ruined the balance of power and its madness. and its too late to fix! only another wipe would do it, the cat is out of the bag, the horse has bolted....

    .... VLTRA has 100+ members. With a good organization (and sailing a lot of miles) we can do It. 

    And we did It. 

    • Like 3

    Lost Diplomacy Papers [out of place posts moved here]

    in National news

    Posted

    British crying....Devs change mechanics.

    It is shameful.
    When the British had the advantage of ships, resources and above all players (they still have this advantage) we never heard them complain about the balance of the game. Now they are going to cry, but of course our dear Devs listen to them 6 hours later, a hello kittying record.
    If only the Brits win, I don't know why the hell the rest of factions still playing.

     

    Clanes españoles.

    in Naval Action - Spanish language

    Posted

    29 minutes ago, Jones el Tuerto said:

    Buenas a todos somos ANIMA MORTALIS un clan español o en el que se habla español del lado pirata, todo el mundo es bienvenido. Jugamos PVE/PVP en el servido EU. Tenemos Discord y nos juntamos casi todos los dias para hacer misiones, craftear, atacar traders...etc. Cualquier pirata que se quiera unir que contacte dentro del juego conmigo con Sermion o con Terik.

    Saludos!

    Suerte, nos veremos por el Caribe.

    • Like 1

    Señorío de puertos parte 2

    in Naval Action - Spanish language

    Posted

    1 hour ago, neogiuliani said:

    Mira chico, olvídame. 

    Pensaba que habían cambiado algo las cosas después del wipe, pero veo que el intento de troleo ad hominem sigue igual

    Tú ves donde quieras y defiende lo que quieras, para mi como si desapareces del mapa.

    Ese ves que significa ??  No te pongas nervioso hombre y mira bien lo que escribes.

    El día que los que como yo, que  hacemos lo contrario que tú, desaparezcamos,  tendrás que hacerte británico o pirata o de cualquier otra facción que no sea España. Pero se ve que preferís criticar a los que intentan hacer algo en vez de hacerlo por vosotros mismos. 

    Hala, a seguir desaparecido.

    Señorío de puertos parte 2

    in Naval Action - Spanish language

    Posted

    3 hours ago, neogiuliani said:

    Que no te quepa duda, que tú y tus comentarios ayudan muchísimo a que ganes esa apuesta.

    No obstante, te lo digo sinceramente: Somos un clan pequeño y nos está costando horrores salir a flote en este comienzo. Para colmo ya van 2 miembros del clan a los que les ha desaparecido todo, outpost, minas, barcos, materiales, etc. Y viendo el pasotismo de los devs en el primer caso, ni siquiera hemos denunciado el segundo. Eso si, como vuelva a ocurrir lo mismo con un tercero, yo dejo el juego.

     

    Nos ha pasado lo mismo, se ha reportado y finalmente les han devuelto los barcos. En cuanto a mi y mis comentarios ...ayudan bastante más que tú disposición a defender los puertos españoles.

×
×
  • Create New...