Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Marques

Members
  • Content Count

    436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

185 Excellent

About Marques

  • Rank
    Junior Lieutenant

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,356 profile views
  1. Perfect analisys ! Congratulations...I think less nations, with order, and many flags will be very interesting to the game. Balance is the Key....As you said if you play as minor country, in alliance of big Nation you will be more free to have many enemies, but also more support from your protector nation. Chances to improve war or action increase. Security or peace, I don't know.
  2. Things that you say here are totally ridiculous ... Now you want a new PVP exclusive zone, for novices ... then you want that there are no alliances, and that hundreds of factions are voting to organize themselves , ins't a Republic or democracy....is a game with rules... All that is absurd ... it Naval Action does not work now , we need more players ... Without regulating the game NA is a kaos .... I vote for 4-5 nations, No more . The rest are only flags, allies. And this countries should have a fewer rights. And if were necessary to change alliances every 3 months that will be perfect. Kings could be the DEVS, or a history engine that adjusts the number of players to each faction ... and ¿why not limit the number of licenses per nation? each 25 %, players, perfect....means all equals weapons per nations. Those who arrive late should go to Portugal, or Denmark, or any other smaller one as an ally. If you lose your right to navigate for your country, you will be careful and ready to recover your seat next time.
  3. Barcucu...who is the dictator ?..Do you really writte this both text , explain ¿? .... if you do not educate and govern your dog ... sooner or later he will bite you
  4. The poll is very tight. 50% do not want to change, vs 49 % yes wants to be ruled. What is the problem to be ruled ¿?¿? This is not a custom game... and you can choose many things. Someone said above that never will fight join with their enemies...it seems very ridicoulous, because the important thing is that NA has many players, and be fun and playable. I think these 50 % first represent the "status quo" , British, Russians, Polish, and minor nations that do not want to disappear on their currently happy position. But actually , in this game, there isn't any kind of diplomacy, nor alliances, nor agreements between nations and clans...All is secret !! and sometimes there are secrets alliances that can broken the game. This problem should be fixed, because it is a very important factor that can spoil the entire game. Also we have time to test, before release. So please let the DEVS rule the game, and I hope they thinking well how to contol the alliances and increase the number of players. I prefer for a short time ,to be allied to the British, or the other ugly nations , than to have a game closed, difficult to play and lack of the players. The Devs launch the poll because they know we have a problem with Nations.
  5. I like your proposal, but main alliances should be ruled by de DEVS ( Kings) every three months, as order come to Europe politics. ( main alliances will be Legendary with Great Factions in your squeme) ( this will regulate rate of players and balance the nations) So main 4-5 Nations are almost impossible to alliance each other, only if regulated by KINGS..(devs), . But the others 10, 15 , are FREE to ally, so they can ssupport biggest one. (is possible whatever number or nations, Minor, but those have not ports, and are mandatory to be allied with only one of the main nations). In this way everybody has their nation, also their own Flag, but in battle the smallest nation have to sign, or fight under the big nation flag. This system will need a politic interfaz, place to see how the nations support one big country or another .( Spain- U.Kingdom- France- Usa- Ducth R.) Should be only cities under the 4-5 Big nations. Small nations cannot ruled cities. So the game would have only 4-5 players, and the others will give support them. As well minor nation as Portugal can be added. Piratas and minor nations cannot win the game under his own Flag
  6. I like your proposal, but main alliances should be ruled by de DEVS ( Kings) every three months, as order come to Europe politics. ( this will regulate rate of players and balance the nations) So main 4 Nations are almost impossible to alliance each other, regulated by KINGS..(devs), . But the others 10, 15 , Yes they can ssupport biggest one. (whatever number or nations, small or medium, have not ports, and are mandatory to ally with only one of the main nations). In this way everybody has their nation, also their own Flag, but in battle the smallest nation have to sign, or fight under the big nation flag. This system will need a politic interfaz, place to see how the nations support one big country or another .( Spain- U.Kingdom- France- Usa- Ducth R.) Should be only cities under the 4-5 Big nations. Small nations cannot ruled cities. So the game would have only 4-5 players, and the others will give support. As well minor nation as Portugal can be added. Piratas and minor nations cannot win the game under his Flag.
  7. Is true. So this is why is so important the DEVS rule the alliances, as the KINGS did on this times. If one faction become the winner, the best, or the bulliest the game will be ruined. I think is better to do the balance with many flags, many players but joined in only 4 main Nations.
  8. As far as I know, Naval Action is Not only from 1780 to 1815....is not Napoleonic war's only....if the DEVS would wanted this way, they had done a Naval Action in Europe, not in the Caribbean. I allways believe that this game is from aprox. 1715 until 1815 , so that because they are Ships like Belle Epoule or anothers made built around 1750. Anyway the issue here is if NA need 11 Nations, or only is enough with 4 main Nations ( Spain , UK, France and Dutch ). Actually I think is better only 4 Nations but very strong border lines, very strong capitals, and more cities unconquerables. We need to do things easier for new players because this game is to much hard to play and very difficult to learnt. So please come back to ships with 3 lifes. So in my opinion we can have 11 or more FLAGS, no nations, with portugal and Italy as well, BUT only 4 Big NATIONS. Then everybody has their flag but should be fight only under the King of this 4 Nations. Alliances is the KEY, and DEVS ruled this alliances in order to have allways 2 BIG enemies. Only pirates should be free out the coalitions, but limited in his number of players. Devs can rule the Alliances every two months as well they did the KINGS in this time. Sailors and Captains don't had the right to sign the war or peace. Only Kings ( DEVs for Us ) decided this wars. Is historical unfair , but easy to implemented, and much better for this game.
  9. Exactly....only if the DEVS rule the game the alliances will work. So it's better 4 Nations and more small nations. It´s not possible a Chess game with many nations, would be better to regulate because sometime in future could be 1000 or 2000 players and the game would be broken if nobody rules the alliances. This game should be controlled and ruled to avoid a disaster and boring system that will never bring more players. If people want current system is because are happy, and them never thinking about raise or increase new players. plz thinking future and regulate de alliances.
  10. The problem is many Nations, few wars, few PvP.... The ruler should be the DEVS...according to rates of players. A 4 Nations system would be easier to ruler.. Also A historical time wacht would be implemented. If the game release on 2020…. Every two months DEVS could be modify the alliances. In a 4 Nations system with 10 minor nations. 1715- 1716 ….. would be January- Feb , 2020. 1716-1717…… would be Mars-April , 2020 1718…. would be May-June, 2020 1719….. would be July- August, 2020 1720.... etc So every current year has corresponde to 6 years in old historical time, and Devs could change politics-alliances mainly in order to number of players. ( Is not Historical system) In this case could be possible in one moment that 3 main nations with several of minor Nations fight againsts only one ( f.e:: UK when this nation have more population with a a risk to break the game) . O maybe two againts all, or maybe Spain againts all ….it would be change every 2 monts according the historical times or players population rates . Because the game become break when only one Nation is the Boss, and the balance between Nations is lost. Current system of 11 Nations is a kaos.
  11. I agree. But also the game could be have a timer...a wacht-time. I agree with you. France Spain and Usa were allies, but not always from 1725 to 1815 there were many changes. The important thing is that a beginning player in NA should knows that he has a place to see alliances and wars. A system of only 4 nations is better than the current one of 11, which is very ridiculous. It would also be possible a calendar system that began in 1715 until 1815 and that developers were implemented alliances and treaties in order to balance the game as the years went by ... One year for example is 3 months and then every 3 months the Devs could balance that 4-nation war system. Also one player should be able to play one main nations or a smallest one that shoul be included Portugal.
  12. Yes, off course ! It´s clear... I belive PvP would be increase if you have 4-Nations allways at war. Why ?...Because you open the game to more players. And Because you increase the number of resources. You increase the possibility of traveling to areas of your allies. You increase the number of flags you can play with. You increase the size of the clans. And besides all that is easier to understand is a plus more realistic system. DEVS just have to lower prices and put more lives on your ships. And then players will have resources and would feel ready to lost their ships at anytime.
  13. I agree. The game was perfect when you have 3 lifes for your Ships. You could lose a boat and go back out and find a new fight. As you say, now the game is very difficult, all the goods are very expensive to buy. It is almost impossible to play without resources or boats. I am in the game since 2015 and I sincerely believe that it should be more arcade in the aspect of being able to enter and know who is your enemy and where to find it. If a new player knows clear that he will be supported by a large clan and knows that he has enough ships and resources, he will not be afraid to go looking for enemies and have fun fighting. For that a 4-nation system alliances can improve a lot in this regard. Game should be easy to play with only 4 main actors. Allways at war. And ships should be more lifes to aware fear to lost it. One place will be allways visible for beginners, in order to know who is your country allie and who is your enemie.
  14. The solutions for 4 Big Nations is to have a box of flags. If you can change your flag of your allied nations, and you can navigate with the possibility of hoist the flag on the minor nations on high seas, at any time. So you will be a box-flags, with 5 or 7 differents minors nations with the chance to choose and navigate safe in all the seas of your allies. The risk may would be the moment or time to do this flag exchange. For example, one player would be able to navigate more relaxing way from Veracruz to San Juan de Puerto Rico by changing 3 times the flag.
  15. I agree. To do the game more historical at the same time easier to play. Only 4 big nations. And many others minors, Include as well Portugal. European situation at Napoleon Wars is not a valid reference, because 1700 to 1815 ( time-ships, for this game) was not 100 years of Napolleonic time. Instead Caribbean history must be the reference. I know the game is not historical, but will help to new players only 4 main NATIONS, that should be in % , Spain 35 % players, France 20 %, UK 20 % , and the 25 % rest goes to Holland Republic whit the others small nations. That is History in caribbean , not in 15 years of Napoleon Era. If the game is not improved in these important historical aspects and it does not benefit new players with more secure zones, fewer enemies and pirates everywhere, the game will never have the necessary appeal to be a best-seller. Game must be easy to understand and play. So only 4 nations , with Spain main enemie will be historicall and easier to play. If a player wants to do battles continuously he needs first the security of having a clan that supports him, cities with spare ships and the ease of traveling on the map without being continuously ganked. That for would be perfect to be less clans, less Nations, and more beginners players. And yes, Portugal, has many potencial players in Brasil. Should be include as minor nation.
×
×
  • Create New...