jodgi
-
Posts
4,454 -
Joined
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by jodgi
-
-
58 minutes ago, Koveras said:
Back when sugar and tobacco plantations was a thing.. Pre 2017..
EDIT: It was not without its flaws, but rather than ironing out the flaws they went with print your own money schemes.. Inflation was bad in the sugar and tobacco economy since whoever sailed his 4 indiamans into port first got a shitload of gold whilst everyone else had to wait for server reset. The inflation we have now is however uncontrollable and will remain so.
Ok. It's not what I picture with the term "player driven economy", though.
-
On 4/20/2019 at 5:39 PM, Koveras said:
There are some of us that remember a fully playerdriven economy
When was this?
-
1
-
-
16 hours ago, Snoopy said:
The Pig Cloud.
Granted
-
3
-
-
On 3/7/2019 at 11:30 AM, Einarr said:
about the PvE kiddy pool within the PvP server.
Nice, you shot your own "suggestion" dead in the third line.
On 3/8/2019 at 10:46 AM, Hethwill said:Interesting, isn't it ?
It is. But I doubt the effect will last beyond our current pre-wipe depression. It would be hilarious if it did, and I don't mean in spite.
It annoys me that the gankers and revenge gankers have managed to coin their safety based playing style as hardcore. It's so softcore it's embarrassing.
I bet the duel feature would work better on PVE than PVP server. PVE players have per definition showed more integrity by opting out of the gank or be ganked world. That shit is for the weak.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Anolytic said:
It is high time that Resource extraction from industry buildings should require taxes paid to the port owner.
We haven't seen the new port features yet, but as I understand it clans can open up for friends investing (dubs, cash, marks?) in ports and production. Wouldn't it be weird to be taxed as an investor or partner?
-
1 minute ago, huliotkd said:
yes but hard nations have a little more bonus cause they don't have a capital. a regular nation has a % of crafting bonus if they craft in capturable port, hard nations (russia,prussia,poland) have %+ of crafting bonus in every port cause they have only capturable ports.
Where did you see this info?
-
30 minutes ago, huliotkd said:
also having account in a hard nation (without Capital) like Russia,Prussia, Poland gives you more bonus on crafting rare ships.
No, because any nation has access to capturable ports outside any zone.
-
8 minutes ago, Liq said:
After server merge
Hehe, I've never managed to gind up to RA on my own, I only achieved that rank from server split and later merge redeemable.
-
3 minutes ago, Koveras said:
Can any1 really say that the game is not grindy af
Ooof, ye, eco stuff is very boringly grindy.
4 minutes ago, Koveras said:with a simplistic economy,
yes, I wish we didn't have it at all.
4 minutes ago, Koveras said:permitwalls on crafting that has basically destroyed crafting
That is scheduled to change. Looks like the devs listen, eh?
-
1
-
-
38 minutes ago, Koveras said:
That ppl feel wrongfully moderated and as a result left negative reviews?
No, you said: "When ppl stated what they perceived was wrong with the game they were banned"
-
3
-
-
Guys, you forget that he's not suggesting negative votes only positive votes.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Routan said:
You lost me there?
What in what he said was abusive? Did he not present an idea of why ppl was banned.
I know you can’t discus a modetator. I give my self a Warmingz
What he said wasn't abusive, but his "idea" is quite simply a lie.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Slim McSauce said:
An entire clan lost their ranks actually for something caused by the developers. Instead of fixing it, they banned people. Think about that.
I also remember the testing rules of "report exploits instead of using them. People who use exploits may have their progress reset."
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Liberalism said:
Only games that favor alts in games get review-bombed by alts
Perhaps eco sandboxes get more review bombed than single account games, i dunno, I haven't payed much attention to such games.
I do remember that around the time we were hit by the SORRY review bomb there was also a lot of blogging and discussion about a review bomb over at PUBG, so it seems single account games aren't safe either.
In the face of review bombing and reviews as a tool to get back at devs I am completely unashamed of my postive alt reviews. All this has taught me that negative reviews are the most unreliable and positive reviews with caveats are the most informative. In my opinion, of course.
-
1
-
-
30 minutes ago, Stilgar said:
If few or hardly any
many
-
44 minutes ago, Capitalism said:
Don't be obtuse. This has to do with finding and participating in PvP for the majority of average players out there. Anything you do to frustrate players who are looking for PvP is bad for the game.
I can't believe that you would argue against anything that encourages people to fight more, even if it doesn't fit your "honorable" preference of arranged duels outside of La Tortue?
Lol. I can actually keep two thoughts in my head at the same time. I have always wanted pvp-on-demand but I've never wanted to dismantle OW with such content. Yet again I'm dumbfounded by the fact that an arena guy is fighting for true OW while OW fans would throw it under the bus for moar PvP.
-
2 hours ago, Socialism said:
The 2min join timer simply wasn't long enough and is not "what you see is what you get" because players upwind could SEE the battle, but sometimes not get back to it.
So you want to diminish the importance of wind in this sailing game?
-
2
-
-
12 hours ago, Baptiste Gallouédec said:
her current hp buff feels super artificial.
Her HP is based on displacement just like all the other ships.
-
To my knowledge the only thing that gives you a better chance at special ships is crafting in a capturable port.
This might change a little too a lot in upcoming patch.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Socialism said:
NA L won’t exist inside NA because those in favor of playing won’t need to buy DLCs.
You've never played WoT, WoWS or WT have you? I'm not even sure I see what you're getting at...
-
42 minutes ago, Capitalism said:
Funny enough, it also has ten+ thousands of active daily players and an extremely vibrant PvP, PvE, RvR, and social tapestry to satisfy all play styles.
Coincidence?
No coincidence at all. Of all those qualities you list I'm only interested in one: PvP, and when combat mechanics in EvE are what they are, there is absolutely no reason for me to play.
I'm sure EvE is a fantastic game for those so inclined.
The reason why I often take the bait in these discussions is because many posters desperately push the "arena will fail" idea. I know why so I try to refrain from even commenting. This is not that day. We can do the pissing contest.
NA OW was great/is great/will become great. NA combat mechanics are however better suited for PvP-on-demand gameplay and the recruitment pool is, by orders of magnitudes, larger.
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, Farrago said:
ping/refresh rate exercises.
A bit of eye and hand coordination, sure, but it's not a ping and refresh rate exercise.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Mr. Doran said:
Fear would imply that there is any alternative answer.
You know how I am a dreamer bordering on sheer stupidity...
-
19 minutes ago, Borch said:
if you got perfect spots to do PvP in the form of patrol zones? You get combat marks for sinking and being sunk there which you can in turn sell for reals.
True. PZs are ostensibly made for me. I used to do PZ's exclusively during their early days. The old "gank-or be ganked" mentality quickly took hold of PZ and my interest waned. I'm not really that hot for medals, I want fun fights more than anything.
23 minutes ago, Borch said:It takes minutes really to cap a frigate
It takes me seconds to craft a better ship.
24 minutes ago, Borch said:How come that you are loosing more when being sunk in DLC ship opposite to crafted ship?
Cannons cost roughly half the ship. When I craft a ship I do it so cheaply I get more than the cost back. I lose only a small portion of the gun crafting cost. If I take a DLC out and lose it I lose the full cost of the guns because there is no insurance for DLC ships.
25 minutes ago, Borch said:but you loose the most time gathering mats to craft that ship.
I already told you I'm more than fine with spending 5-10 min. each week. It will be less after port investment.
26 minutes ago, Borch said:Reals from insurance shouldnt matter
But I explained how insurance is great for me because I craft on a budget; I get almost everything back and have no need to grind cash.
27 minutes ago, Borch said:Where do you use your best wood DLC
Have all the ships, haven't used them yet because they cost me more reals.
29 minutes ago, Borch said:or crafted ships then?
I've used crafted ships exclusively. Like I said I did PZs a lot, but have almost stopped. I've been sitting inside the solo PZ with Diana, frigate and cerb. Noone would tag. I've had a bit of fun in the Nassau solo zone, but I lost my last Niag a few weeks ago trying to get out. Without rewards for the loser I fear solo PZ will become a fake feature, I may sit there because I know I get everything back if I lose the ship, but people prefer the gank zones in the hope they end up on the strong side + some rewards even if they end up on the weak side.
I've done a tiny bit of OW hunting as well. Me and Laik hunted for an hour in the general area around Navasse without finding anything, as we were heading back to LT we ran into a herc we smashed out of boredom. I've also hunted solo in a cerb. I figured anyone would engage me in such a shitty ship. A brit req ran away but I was finally able to sink a Prussian Indiaman before I gave up on the cerb experiment.
Nobody came for a full 90 minutes.
37 minutes ago, Borch said:Why do you care for reals if you are not interested in any other NA part besides PvP?
I don't care about reals. I just take great care so I don't ever (hopefully) have to go grind reals.
Rare Woods and Resources
in Current Feature Improvement Suggestions
Posted
Arright, so I'm not insane... Good!