Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

CHARLIE V

Members
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

12 Good

About CHARLIE V

  • Rank
    Landsmen

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think just "they" want the comfort of having safe ports
  2. when AI port attacks are triggered on PVE server? will we have attacks this weekend? @admin
  3. Thank you for your quick performance, I feel happy with your statement. We knew that we did not reach the percentage of PB to obtain the port, but we found it unfair and dishonest, the entry of said player in our warming
  4. Miembros 6 6 6 publicaciones Informar publicacion Publicado hace 2 minutos (editado) I want to report that yesterday at 11:30 until 12:10 a player from the British nation named Frank Ramsey decided to enter the warming of George town with Pandora to burst our warming towards George Town Within this battle, the player repeated several times that he did not know the English language and that we spoke to him in German. That was passed by a player who identified with our problem by making us know how dishonorable the British player is. I guess the comments of my warming battle are recorded in some document within the game and I hope that the @ administration will look for these documents to confirm my actions. I understand that this is not allowed to be that way. I hope that the administration takes action in the face of such an act of dishonor. Question: I thought this game is a struggle of nations to control the ports, because players from other nations are allowed to enter the warming of the port of another nation. We show our great concern about these acts. I wish that measures be taken to avoid it in the future.
  5. CHARLIE V

    La navasse

    nop, The official statement was communicated after the warming of the port, therefore any accusations you make to those who captured the navasse during the incident are without foundation, they have always taught me to distrust strangers and to rely on facts and not on the word of others. . we went to the navasse, we captured it and we lost it because it was said that it was a mistake and it was over, the only thing we ask for is an apology for what happened to the administrators who have not deigned to say sorry and put an official statement in game that the events of the navasse will be investigated, I assume that for that is the important announcements within the game login, right?
  6. LA NAVASSE has not been taken by raiders because if it should not appear as shown below
  7. In my opinion you are absolutely right, the war is not fair, but that means that if you put a CB limitation, your opponent has the right to overcome said CB, while you are obliged to comply with it at a low table. Is virtual warfare fair? It should be in a game ...
  8. Seeing the implementation that they have put in, we enter the game to try to help the attacked to recover the ship, once the battle was over, unfortunately we could not recover the ship. OUR INTENTION WAS NOT ATTACKING THE PLAYER, BUT RETURNING THE BOAT
×
×
  • Create New...