Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Landsman

Members2
  • Posts

    1,056
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Landsman

  1. 37 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    why didnt you answer my query about GLs policy on banning forum posters ?   is it because there isnt one like you claimed

    Mate people have even been banned for giving the game a negative review... I know I am so very important to you that you really want to know my IGN but it just won't happen, baby. 

     

    40 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    dont put words into my mouth ... where have i said  dont like you thats your perception  not a fact like most forum warriors you want me to dislike you because another forum enemy entertains you ...the real reason why you dont use your in game name

    What now? I can't make any sense of this :lol:

    42 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    your not really bothered about the content of your post

    You should really compare the quality of content in your posts and mine. I'm trying to reason with you and all you give me is gibberish about forum warriors and ingame names...

  2. 1 hour ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    .thats not corect or even a valid point or argument

    Except for it is? If you make people lose marines with their ship, you will increase fear of losing in people and drive them to avoid combat / defeat more than they would otherwise. There is even hard evidence to prove my argument is very valid, since we had officer lives ( almost the same ) and it was removed for the very same reason. 

    There is a claim, reason and evidence. It is a reasonable argument.

    1 hour ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    look up the meaning of the word coward it doesnt apply

    Sorry but wrong again, it does and very much so.

    coward [kou-erd]

    noun

    1.

    a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition,pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person.

    1 hour ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    if i knew your ingame name ..i wouldnt do anything apart from avoid you in ts ..or any other social interaction such as nation chat and certainly wouldnt join a clan which you were a member of

    Almost sounds like you don't like me </3

    But why would I give a crap? 

    1 hour ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    3 your arguing to the nth degree now  and have been throughout the thread ...

    Well, people keep quoting me and I simply answer. I would deem it polite? 

  3. 43 minutes ago, Percival Merewether said:

    I find it relatively easy to fight off fir/fir frigates

    I meant when you are in fir ship and want to fight 2-3 enemies that probably run some heavier wood. Pretty hard to fight outnumbered when sailing a fir boat... assuming the enemy players have some basic skill...

    46 minutes ago, Percival Merewether said:

    Either way, do not judge people too fast..They usually have a reason for running - I frequently engage ships larger than my own and am forced to leave because it gets too dangerous. Most recently when I attacked a L'Ocean + Bucentaure with an Agamemnon (me) + Trinc (Nethros). We attacked knowing that we were outgunned and the two french SotLs covered each other well,  I would never consider our retreat an act of cowardice.

    Yeah, but this isn't what I meant... I mean people that don't take fights even tho they have good chances to win and only sail fir boats so they can avoid any battles that could have been balanced and not a complete gank. It's perfectly fine and obviously logical to avoid a fight that would put you at a heavy disadvantage... sailing a paper rocket boat to avoid any fight that you aren't almost guaranteed to win is a whole other story tho...  that's why I can't understand people hating on patrol zones - even with all its flaws, at least you are given the opportunity there to avoid those clowns in their fir ships wasting your time.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    your not right and  its you that have no real point or valid argument

    Care to elaborate? You should be able to point it out then, right?

    3 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    you hide behind a name thats not your in game name with the excuse you might get banned in game over forum posts ..thats a joke unless you want to troll and abuse people on  forums

    You obviously have forgotten GL policy on bans. I haven't. Also we are all "hiding behind a name" - surprise dweebenheimer, it's the internet. Is your real name Grundgemunkey? 

    What would you do if you knew my ingame names? Put a bounty on me? You think I'd give a shit what people think about me in a video game? :lol:

    8 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:

    you will argue to the nth degree over something that you posted even when you know that post was a mistake

    Can you give an example of such a post? Because I'd really like to see one.

  5. 29 minutes ago, Percival Merewether said:

    Let me ask you this... We  can both agree that sailing fir/fir ships to gank is cowardly - but what if you sail fir/fir or Teak/Teak with speedmods to catch the fir/fir "cowards".. is that cowardly? It is the only way to ever force them into a fight..

    And then when the fir/fir chaser is caught by a LO/WO ship of the same class, is it cowardly to leave if he starts losing? I don't think so., fir/fir is extremely weak - the only advantage it has is speed.

    Yeah, very fair point and maybe the only exception but then again why would you stoop down to their level and play their coward game? Can you fight 2-3 enemies in a fir ship if you meet them and have even a slight chance to win? Because I don't.... By choosing fir to chase cowards you lose your ability to fight real PvP players in PvP ships.

  6. 7 minutes ago, Capt Trashal Early said:

    Regardless your invested attacks

    I treat people how they deserve to be treated. You will find, that I respect people actually being able of having a sound and reasonable argumentation as well as actually contributing to a conversation / discussion but others.... well not so much. I guess it is a very basic human trait?

    Also take this thread for example. I said people already play like cowards in NA ( a mere fact ) and there is no reason to push it even further. Then this other dude felt addressed and acts like the average NA player doesn't play like a chicken, getting all offended... like what the F? Are we playing the same game?

    32 minutes ago, Capt Trashal Early said:

    earns you the forum warrior title/Twat. <3

    giphy.gif

    • Like 1
  7. 1 minute ago, HachiRoku said:

    I don't get it

    Yes, that's what I am saying.

    I didn't say I am better than him or anything ( bragging about being good at a video game is only for virgins with small dicks ).

    All I said was that this marine idea is useless, since it will make people even more scared to take fights when they lose their marines with the ship and that only cowards and gankers sail fir/fir ships. Hard to disagree, if you know the game mechanics and playerbase I guess?

    Then the dude got all triggered asking about my ingame name even tho it has NOTHING to do with what I said so I was simply mocking him about it. Pretty weird but amusing really. I guess he loves fir ships?

     

  8. Is it really so hard to just check what patrol mission is up? Not like much else is going on in NA anyways? But I think you should get the mission automatically as active... it makes no sense that you have to activate it every time and also it would show anyone the Patrol zone on the map by default.

    • Like 4
  9. 41 minutes ago, Trino said:

    You tell us about cowardness and dont have the balls to say us your character name

     

    23 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    who is the coward now? why are you hiding behind a false name? Fair enought :-)

    Mabye you guys are illiterate ... or retarded? Must be either one as I explained the reason in my previous post. ;) And I ask again... how does it matter?

  10. 2 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    you belong to the category of those who like to judge others

    Well, I judge people sailing fir/fir ships that aren't traders... that's for sure.

    3 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    What's your in-game name?

    How does it matter for this topic... at all? It's always funny when people run out of arguments and ask about my ingame name... what you wanna 1 vs 1 me now and the winner is right? You gonna check my stat board and profile to see whether I have been sailing fir/fir trashboats? ...oh wait there isn't anything like that in game :lol:

    4 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    Can I know it?

    I have 7 ingame names and no, you can not know them. People have been banned ingame for voicing their opinions on the forums while using their account names and I don't see how my ingame names are related to anything I am discussing here with you. I'll let you in on a little secret about my ingame accounts tho: There are no pussy fir/fir failboats on any of them - hope that helps!

    9 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    game allows you to build ships in fir / fir

    The game also allows you to build fir/fir 1st rates. Does it mean I shouldn't call someone retard for building one?

    10 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    no one can criticize a player who "runs" from a ship of the same category but built in LO / WO!

    I can but I didn't...  I criticized players that sail fir/fir on warships, because it is only for ganking or running from fights - NOTHING else. 

    18 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    NA Legends

    Patrol zones is the new Legends it seems... :)

  11. 2 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    I am tired of these brave captains who judge the other players just because they have a different play style than theirs! Anyway please help me understand! So if you are against more numerous enemies or with more powerful ships you still fight with the assumed result of being sunk and for this you would be brave and instead who flees would be a coward? Maybe you confuse courage with stupidity! However, building better ships is one of the few purposes of this game, so the economy and trading make sense. Your game model (never run away!) would force us all to play with shit ships making crafting and trading useless! And then who are you to judge if a player is a brave or a coward? I advise you to weigh your words better.

    It's pretty simple really - if someone avoids a fights with equal chances or better yet a fight where he would have an advantage, he is a coward. I am not judging the "playstyle" , I am calling it what it is...

    noun
    1.
    a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition
     
    When you get ganked 10 vs 1 and run away ( if you have a chance ), it is smart. If you run away from what could be a good fight, it isn't smart - it is being a coward. There is the difference.
     
    11 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    If a player decides to use a ship in FIR / FIR and faces an enemy ship in live oak / WO and decides to escape is he a coward?

    Yes, he is a coward for sailing a fir/fir warship... I mean what's the point of it really? You're faster but you can't really fight... sooo why would you build such a ship at all, if you aren't a wuss or tagger for some gank squad?

     
    This is why OW is a waste of time... you either sail a combat ship that is built for battle -> you can't catch cowards in fir/fir gankboats and they can gank you 10 vs 1 or you sail a fir/fir gankboat and can only gank, because your ship is made of cuckwood and pussyplanks - you can't have a worthy battle in that - only run and gank.
     
    13 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    play as you like

    I want to but the game mechanics and almost dead server pop don't allow me to... only patrol missions in shallows and if they add 4-5 rate ones are still worth it.

    15 minutes ago, MassimoSud said:

    and if you like to be sunk systematically nobody will condemn you to be a stupid

    No, I'd rather sail all over the map in my fir/fir warship to troll the 50 people that are still trying to get OW PvP without being in a gank fleet until the steam reviews hit < 30%.

    205t1d.jpg

    Thanks for this meme @Batman 

     
  12. 39 minutes ago, Cetric de Cornusiac said:

    Maybe bottles were temporarily switched off by some recent update?

    Probably just nerfed to 0.00000000000000000000001% dropchance. Bottles gave every player a chance to get good upgrades only by being in OW... and we don't want people sailing in OW or people to have good upgrades without being 24/7 powergamers, now do we?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...