Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Gregory Rainsborough

Members2
  • Posts

    2,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by Gregory Rainsborough

  1. EXILE has only come the Bahamas twice to my knowledge, one time, the person in question forgot their guns and the second time we knew the PB would be empty. I listen to the opinions of those that show up to the PB's in the Bahamas and those that do overwhelmingly support the timers being as they are.
  2. The Gulf and the ports near Bluefields have all been on silly timers for several weeks. You haven't seen me complain on the forums though! It just means training the nightwatch to be better so they can take the fight so they switch the timers back.
  3. Hostility should be based solely on PvP and reset every month or after a PB. None of this AI hostility missions bullshit. Or alternatively, make hostility generation last several days. One massive hostility mission with 15-20 odd ships over a four day period.
  4. What gives you the impression that we're a 'purely EU comprised fleet'? Most of us are sure but we have New Zealanders, Americans and South Americans in the clan. Europeans can play during the day as we do! Most of the French clans that are 0300-0600 are as we are, primarily EU based. At least everyone can attack us at weekends, no Europeans can attack at that time.
  5. Well I could set the timer to 11-14 when I know we can defend and others can't attack or I can set it to 18-21 so we can defend and others can attack. I don't particularly want to defend ports so I'll do what suits me and my clan agrees with me.
  6. Slight problem there for these whiners in that our 11-14 group is as large as our 18-21.
  7. It never being reset seems a bit excessive, once a week it resets perhaps, like the Conquest Competition?
  8. If hostility built up over multiple days so that defenders have a chance of stopping hostility missions it might incentivise people to put them to decent timers. Half the problem is multiflipping the other is not being able to stop a port battle being created in the first place due to you being able to do 4 missions at once.
  9. With the exception of one battle every single time I've been in a battle with you chaps some KOTO guy has blown up. You're like roman candles
  10. KOTO guys spontaneously combust on a regular basis so that wouldn't be very smart of me
  11. RIP any hopes of an Americas based clan holding a port.
  12. "But herp derp we want to fight Britain because we're afraid of the Swedes." Not my problem.
  13. ^That right there. The French, Pirates and Prussians want shallow port battles? Attack Nassau, Deadmans Cay, Bimini etc...
  14. I could abandon all the loss making ports and be far richer for it.
  15. For a dead nation they're capable of fielding an 11k port battle fleet. Don't talk rubbish. They're not dead, they're consolidating.
  16. People seem to be under the impression I'm here to provide enemy nations content, I'm not, I couldn't give a hoot if you guys are entertained. I'm here to look after my clan and nation.
  17. We have plenty of content fighting the Russians at the moment, perhaps you should work on your Swedish problem down south if you find content lacking.
  18. *waits patiently for the European based French clans to move their timers from 3 in the morning*
  19. We have a very small player base that PvPs which is what matters. Having a horde of carebears isn't a benefit.
  20. There are plenty of GB players that are in your timezone.
×
×
  • Create New...