Chijohnaok
-
Posts
495 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Chijohnaok
-
-
The Devs listening appears to be selective.
Players from the Western Hemisphere and Asia who are locked out of RvR during their primetime 5 days of the week raised that issue right after the current RvR Conquest mechanic was implemented many, many months ago.
The response:
-
5
-
-
11 minutes ago, Celtiberofrog said:
ok, how come there is no IA Spanish fleet ?
As it is supposed to be into Protection area
AI Reinforcements were patched out long ago. Since it was the Spanish capital protected area the window for any other Spanish players to join is open much longer (the whole 90 minutes if I am not mistaken).
-
3 hours ago, Gottel said:
I use trade ships to store material, if normal storage in port is full. Is everythink inside the ship deleated too? If tranfered to storage , what happend if storge in port is full?
I am equally concerned about this. I have multiple ports where I have "storage" trader ships that do nothing but hold finished parts or resources.
What will happen to those stored parts/resources?
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Potemkin said:
Trying to limit screening will only throw a wrench into any potential agreement and cause contention and finger pointing. How would you tell people not to? At this point its a well known source of fun pvp for those who aren't included in any given PB for both sides. I understand why you want to include it but i dont think that one is remotely within anyones control.
I can see the point by some of concessions involving screening, but Potemkin has a very valid point. And to expand on Potemkin's point:
Only a limited # of people can join a port battle; OW PvP is to a large extent currently non-existent, which for some players leaves screening actions as the best (or sometimes only) opportunity for some players to get meaningful PvP.
Is there a way to satisfy the needs of everyone?
-
1 hour ago, rediii said:
20:30 then?
20:30????
That translates to 4:30pm EST, and 1:30PM PST.
In other words, no RvR for North)/South American players Monday through Friday when most are either at work or school, and port battles only on Saturdays and Sundays. Am I to understand that correctly?
If I am to be limited to RvR only 28% of the week, then perhaps I should ask Game-Labs to refund me $29 (72% of the $40 that i paid) as compensation for only being allowed to fully utilize the game 28% of the week?
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, rediii said:
I'm pretty disappointed that you accuse the whole danish nation here that they dup /dupped things. Atleast that's the only thing that came up in my wind when you said that "one nation was pretty aware of this and used it pretty much and dupped craftable mods too"
No proof and you trust the one who twists every possible fact and points fingers at people who did maybe something wrong.
Rediii,
Go back and listen to Jeheil's video. I never heard him say the word "Danes"; he said IIRC, "one particular nation" and "one nation". Did you somehow hear him say the Danish nation did it, because I didn't hear him say that. Did your ears subliminally tell you that it was the Danes doing it and if so, i wonder why you heard it that way? Something you want to share with the rest of us?
-
1
-
-
26 vs 24.
Credit to the Spanish side that one (1) player left on their side, still leaving the PB at 25 vs 24 (and then only a few minutes later the Cerberus (Gregori) that joined the US side escaped (leaving it 25 vs 23).
This is twice now that this has happened against the US/British in the last few days.
Please devs, fix this if you want any hope of players respecting the integrity of the game.
-
2
-
-
Thank you to the opposing side for having the extra player escape from the PB.
-
8
-
-
1 hour ago, monk33y said:
To fix the alliances, reduce nations to one allie only each.......! Let's test how strong our bonds really are!!!!
Well, even that would not satisfy some.
If two nations with too many players in the same time zone (say North American players) were to ally then you would still have others griping about nations/alliances being "unbalanced" and about the dreaded "n"nightflips word.
-
6 minutes ago, Senhor Lenhador said:
Sorry, but this is the Spanish of the forum. If you do not speak Spanish (and there's nothing wrong with that) at least put what you mean in google translate. Many non-English speakers hispanohablantes--not only strive to write their ideas, comments and complaints on the other part of the forum in English. If they strive for should show the same respect and communicate the language of your part of the forum. Please do not take it as a criticism or a reproach, I'm not accusing you of anything, much less; simply that we can not expect people to speak to us in our language as much reserved for their own sites.
Now on the subject.
Not the solution, but of course does not include suffering multiple nights with little sleep and then having to endure the bug yanquee forum that presuming Had we defeated. Because in the end we defeated. We can not be 24 hours fighting against the Dutch and British European time against Americans and American time. Or change of alliances, or we faction has an agreement (or until peace) with the Americans or we must accept that the Gulf is the yanquees because we can not fight effectively against them. I do not want to be part of any Navy Insomnios fighting these people,
not worth the effort.
My apologies for not including a Google translation in Spanish. It was inconsiderate of me.
Mis disculpas por no incluir una traducción de Google en español. Fue desconsiderado de mí.
-
6
-
-
1 hour ago, Bearwall said:
Nightflips has been going on for as long as the regional bonusses and the dropping of the lord protector system. I agree that there are a lot to work on in this game, but not having you guys outright sabotaging it will definately help the rest of the community discuss other aspects of the game.
Players in the non-European time zones doing RvR during their primetimes is no more "sabotage" than European players doing RvR during their primetimes. If you expect North American players not to do RvR during "your" nights, then should I ask European players not to do RvR during our (North American) days when we are at work/school?
Maybe we should just limit ALL RvR to weekends when everyone has the best opportunity of meeting each other in battle? How do you think that (RvR only 2 days a week) would go over?
-
2
-
-
7 hours ago, E.P. Juel said:
A day of celebration!
The attrition of EU nation players is soon over.
It will be a better server in the end, don't worry you are not locked out from the server, you can still play.. You reap what you sow US, clearly your RvR players exit will not be felt, cause when you are flipping we are sleeping - no one can defend as US is the only nation with US time-zoned nation. Your allies who are all EU nations can and will still defend you in EU primetime, but if you wanna participate in PB on EU server, better get accustomed to weekend PB's. If you begin to miss fighting empty PB's, you can do in your primetime on a dedicated server. How is everyone not happy here?
You get an entire server where you can nightflip everyone and proclaim more no battle victories.
I'm sure a number of US will change server, but I am confident a great number of players will return to the game. Wrath, you say you did everything for sports... In the beginning we as testers was trying to solve an issue here, but US representatives on this forum was not even trying to have a mature dialog of how to address an issue. In fact, you denied there even was an issue, saying that danish/french/spanish/swedish were crying, but you deliberatly used tactics on EU server to make people quit and you used this forum just to troll and rant about the "fairness" of everything, saying everyone have same cards on their hands. What is wrong with you? Epic professional trolling done by you(wraith), Christendom and multiple other US guys here.
Preventing nightflips will cause much more players to come back than US leaving! Furthermore, the players coming back will be EU players = more activity in EU primetime. Possessions will not be taken away in work nights, a whole nations wont try to bully, troll and grief their EU counterparts out of the game, using an exploit and only attacking in workdays. Past 3 months, you only did 2 or 3 weekend attacks.
I believe to have thanked you 2 months ago for speeding up the process, by doing this a change was forced upon the devs, unfortunately changes in NA comes late. We have tested, you've had your nightflip fun, for far too long IMO.
Thanks devs, for fixing the game in one aspect.
The devs have "fixed" nothing yet in regards to the so called "nightflips" issue. I have seen no patches or hotfixes addressing the issue.
And in case you hadn't noticed, we are almost an entire week into March and still waiting on the " Support patch: January " and "Content patch: February" patches.
-
1 minute ago, Alvar Fanez de Minaya said:
You're absolutely right, that is precisely why ALL (American and European) must ask to open two servers with different schedules so we can all play our schedule.
Should the Asian players also ask for their own server, since right now neither PvP1 nor PvP 2 server works for them?
-
Just now, Jorge said:
You can play whenever you want, we also ...
Gracias, that is all that I ask.
-
Just now, Jorge said:
Another Clown. We hope you have fun a lot with those empty PBs.
I simply ask to be allowed to play the game during my prime time, no different than players in other parts of the globe do.
-
28 minutes ago, Pablo Frias said:
Well, stop answering the andante this amoeba, which has already received enough.
For my part I do today I will decide after the battle of Ays. I like going to another country for a while (to the delight of many)
(my underlined emphasis above)
Pablo, you are more than welcome to join the "day crew" in the Estados Unidos de America. ;-)
-
1 hour ago, Dave Hadley said:
??????????????
I am not Christendom and Christendom is not me.
i believe in Christendom's post he was referring to the "Chijohnaok Doctrine".
-
6 hours ago, PIerrick de Badas said:
First time you capture Castrie it was by mistakes, you didn't think you could capture it, you make it for troll wihtout screen and almot withtout defenders. It was on J5 post patch. Don't try to change history. The behaviors of your US friends will not be forgotten and your minus victory will not be change in a D Day. It was a crappy victory as was your attacks yesterday and all this week everywhere. You win 2 ports on 10 offensive PB. Both were in middle of the night against minus forces or no forces. Congrats i tiphat you for your ability to be so good
My bold emphasis above.
Wrong my Frenchie friend.
The United States won a port battle at La Vega this past Monday.
That port batte was not during the middle of the night, it was at 21:10 server time:
And it was not a " minus forces or no forces" port battle:
that is unless you think that 25 players of the Spanish nation (mostly VLTRA) constitute " minus forces or no forces".
-
2
-
-
8 minutes ago, JonSnowLetsGo said:
No, is much easier: If you are allied with your whole timezone then play fking PvE only, cause thats what you want obviously, and dont ruin the game for all others.
I play the game that the developers have set out. I have done port battles during EU primetime when my calendar allows it, and I also do port battles during my own North American primetime. I am not breaking any rules in the game. I am not using any illegal exploits or hacks to do so.
I don't tell you how to play your game and you will not Hello Kitty tell me how to play my game.
-
1
-
-
Good luck and jajajaajajaja to you and your clan.
-
Wraith, I think what they are trying to tell us is this:
If you are based in the Western Hemisphere or Asia you are entitled to pay $40 to play(or test) this game and you are also entitled to RvR during your own primetime on weekends only.
-
4 minutes ago, Christendom said:
Just saw your edit on here. The RUS/RDNN clan will back me up in saying this, the US has been used as diversion targets quite a number of times against them. We're ok with it. Santa Domingo also had more US players in it than brit. Your alternative facts again are wrong. Stop trying to drive a non existent wedge between our 2 nations for your own benefit. It's not gonna happen.
PS - I was presented with this interesting screenshot today. SORRY fleet utterly destroyed by US players at Salinas Point.Christendom, that PB only had 21 SORRY members in it.
LV can't be held responsible for the poor performance and impact on the PB fleet of the 4 non-SORRY players. ;-)
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Havelock said:
I think were talking past each other. I understand the OP as "everything above this line is US homewaters, dont attack it", which implies the US should own it and nobody is allowed to contest it (ofc you could give regions to allies, but what would be the point of that?). A general agreement of defining homewaters doesnt have to do anything with the current situation. Imagine a fully neutral map, and then some not selfish thinking diplomats sit down and agree on a few regions for every nation that secure their economy and are in no situation allowed to be contested by any other nation. And in that case, 39 ports is way over the top.
Your thougts seem to be based on the current map. Even if the OP wasnt meant serious, the idea to agree on non-RvR ports is something which could take a lot of salt out of this game.
Posting in response only to your last comment which begins "...the idea that to agree on....".
Did you take issue with the "Three Admirals Treaty" which had non RvR provisions? (IIRC that treaty specifically spelled out a small border "RvR" region where RvR between Britain and Spain was allowed and provided for no RvR between Britain and Spain in any other regions).
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Havelock said:
Hi @Chijohnaok, have i offended you or why are you commenting on a month-old post of mine? My post is obviously a reply to the OP. If you dont remember, its about the so called "Chijohnaok Doctrine" and named after you. "US home waters" are hereby described as "that nation's home ports and economic bases" (quote) with a map that includes:
- Bermuda (3 ports)
- Kidd's Island (3 ports)
- North Carolina (3 ports)
- South Carolina (4 ports)
- Georgia (3 ports)
- Timucua (4 ports)
- Costa del Fuga (5 ports)
- Grand Bahama (3 ports)
- Abaco (3 ports)
- Andros (5 ports)
- New Providence (4 ports)
- Exuma (5 ports)OVERALL: 45 ports
I dont know about you, but in my opinion 45 are much more ports than 18 (Danes at that time) or 27 (Dutch at that time), placing the US 3rd on time of my post. I know playing for the US urges you to supply alternative facts, but if you really wanted to discuss the idea of a treaty that declares untouchable homewaters you could have answered on my accusation that its "inacceptable" "they contain both Live Oak regions and both Pirate Refit regions".
Go for it, surprise me with an constructive answer.
Until then, have a nice day.
First of all, I was not offended by your initial post.
And I apologize for my tardy response to it. I apparently skipped/skimmed over it when you first made it and only noticed it today when the thread was linked in a post by Christendom.
Next, you listed above in the quoted post both the 3 ports for Bermuda and the 3 ports for Kidd's Island. Neither Bermuda nor Kidd's are on that map. Neither of those regions were deemed as "US home waters" or a part of the "nation's home ports and economic bases". Bermuda is owned by our British allies, and, if I am not mistaken, the Kidd's is owned by the Pirates (but in no case are owned by the US Nation).
Timucua is owned by our British allies, as are New Providence and Exuma but those areas are deemed to be within the "US Home Waters". But they are NOT owned by the US and were not included in totals that I included in my earlier post today.
So it is NOT 45 ports as you contend.
Neither the US nation, nor the alliance that we are in control both Pirate refit bonus regions. The US owns the Abaco region, which has a Pirate Refit bonus. The other Pirate Refit bonus region is Kidd's Island. To my knowledge, Kidd's is owned by the pirates. It is NOT owned by the US, and since the map reset has never been owned by the US.
And as for the US (actually its alliance) owning both Live Oak producing regions, may I remind you that at map reset, the US owned one of the Live Oak producing regions (Georgia) and the Spanish owned the other (Timucua). The Danes then captured Savannah from the US, leaving the US and its allies with NO Live Oak producing ports. The Western Alliance was without a Live Oak producing region for (the my recollection) around 10 days to 2 weeks. At the time Fine Live Oak was vital for building exceptional first rate ships. It was vital for the Western Alliance to have a region that produced Fine Live Oak. The British then were able to capture Timucua. It was only some time later that the United States was able to recapture Savannah. Since the Fine Woods were removed from the game for building exceptional ships the importance of these two Live Oak regions is diminished. And one or more diplomats for the Eastern Alliance told us that they had more Live Oak stockpiled than they knew what to do with.
You get an entire server where you can nightflip everyone and proclaim more no battle victories.
Declaration of the French Council about the new European server
in National news
Posted
I meant that those that will move to the new EU Safe Spaces server could (or should) be stranded there.