Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Recommended Posts

veji1    39
On 23/04/2017 at 6:37 PM, deltahill said:

Yes i would pay for a DLC if it was a good one that changed the strategic play-ability but not if it was a patch or fix for a bug. i love to see a sand box game of this game were players would form there own battles on the ground they choose with a generated map system

Agreed, the only valuable DLC for this game was if they did a DLC to retrofit a major new development on the strategic engine for example. imagine their next game is a napoleonic game with a much more dynamic strategic game rather than just a linear "Robert Lee General 2" chain of battle, then yes, retrofitting that would be well worth a DLC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/28/2017 at 8:43 AM, veji1 said:

Agreed, the only valuable DLC for this game was if they did a DLC to retrofit a major new development on the strategic engine for example. imagine their next game is a napoleonic game with a much more dynamic strategic game rather than just a linear "Robert Lee General 2" chain of battle, then yes, retrofitting that would be well worth a DLC.

I like the way you think, but what you are describing is not DLC. 

That is an enormous undertaking that would involve rewriting the entire game and creating 'UG:CW II'. 

I hope they think about it seriously down the road. And that we are all here to enjoy it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×