jekct1212 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Naval DLC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veji1 Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 On 23/04/2017 at 6:37 PM, deltahill said: Yes i would pay for a DLC if it was a good one that changed the strategic play-ability but not if it was a patch or fix for a bug. i love to see a sand box game of this game were players would form there own battles on the ground they choose with a generated map system Agreed, the only valuable DLC for this game was if they did a DLC to retrofit a major new development on the strategic engine for example. imagine their next game is a napoleonic game with a much more dynamic strategic game rather than just a linear "Robert Lee General 2" chain of battle, then yes, retrofitting that would be well worth a DLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andre Bolkonsky Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 On 4/28/2017 at 8:43 AM, veji1 said: Agreed, the only valuable DLC for this game was if they did a DLC to retrofit a major new development on the strategic engine for example. imagine their next game is a napoleonic game with a much more dynamic strategic game rather than just a linear "Robert Lee General 2" chain of battle, then yes, retrofitting that would be well worth a DLC. I like the way you think, but what you are describing is not DLC. That is an enormous undertaking that would involve rewriting the entire game and creating 'UG:CW II'. I hope they think about it seriously down the road. And that we are all here to enjoy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now