Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by saintjacktar

  1. 2 hours ago, Lord Gud said:

    Try making a brand new email not linked to anything and never use it for anything besides steam. You use one email for multiple websites/etc and passwords/emails get leaked and sold by the thousands. Good to hear you got your account back though ^_^

    Yeah I have thanks for the idea, also to those curious I was a fool and did not have a mobile authenticator only email and he/she was able to circumvent that. I am proud to announce I am the owner of a Steam guard Mobile Authenticator and have changed the privacy settings on my account also.

    Kindest regards,


    Fair winds and Following Seas

  2. Had my Steam account Hijacked at the early hours of this morning. He Stole it changed my attached email, mobile number, account name and steamguard (anti hack protocol) then as a began reporting it to Steamsupport suddenly my account reappears...only its not my account, its a shell account setup to appear as if I have my account back, I did some digging found my old out account, name changed with a Russian DP and a comment on the profile "Такие как ты всегда получают по заслугам. Тебе все воздастся." So I have a new account (which the hijacker kindly setup) with NA on it but I have lost all my progress. my in game name is Saintjacktar (Pirate Nation/Global Server) VCSO clan ... If there is anything you can do to give me back my progress I would greatly appreciate it. @Ink

  3. On 2017-6-30 at 7:23 AM, Hammerhaj said:

    I know for a fact, that you and the rest of TF and VCO changed nation to GB on global server - mainly because you lost a few port battles, saying everyone in US nation were noobs. Now you declared war against your former nation in another thread.. Ppl should read this:

    Hmmmm.. so the thing is when you're about to go into a PB and a random clan sits in your TS muted and seperate to the main fleet in OW, in ships not recommended for the PB, then joins the the PB (that they grinded) then we lose due to inferior ships and poor command (keep in mind 99% remained muted during the PB) only to unmute during the debrief and blame it soley on the PB commander and when questioned about the inferior (store bought) ships to say "I grinded the hostility who are you to tell me I can't RvR because I have the wrong ship"  and then leave TS. Oh and not to mention the PB Commander who was bad, when criticised in the debrief leaves the TS immediately. I mean those sorts of divisions within a nation are untenable. With an organised clan like BLACK at your front door and those divisions in a nation, it wasn't a workable problem. That's truely why we left believe it or not. (Oh and to play with our old GB friends also) 

  4. I'll say this, it could be part to do with Piracy not being real Piracy in NA. There's no "find a lucrative trade item with the most out of profit between point A and point B, learn the trade route and hunt along that trade route" kind of piracy in this game. It's all camp this port, camp that port or hunt deep in enemy waters because they wont be able to catch me tactics. I think this is part of what makes deep sea sailing a "chore". If I was a Pirate I would do my research and hunt the expensive item traders in the deep sea trade lanes, perhaps with a letter of marque. but alas i am not a Pirate. just a thought

    kind regards,

    • Like 1
  5. 1 hour ago, Anolytic said:

    It's amusing how obviously this masturbatory post is trying to cover for the fact that you haven't actually achieved anything. Only the US Nation would count taking practically undefended ports as a victory. 

    Have fun with your self-gratification.

    Meanwhile in Russia:

    I dont know, by all whiny threads flooding this forum now id say we ve exacted our revenge!  XD


  6. 33 minutes ago, Kloothommel said:

    The next map wipe will not change much I am afraid.

    We need to figure out how to make the game survive this lean period.

    The US extended it's olive branch in the form of the diplomatic parley and your representatives were unable to have, honest, fair and civilized dialogue. We were under no obligation to do so, but in the interest of preserving the game and protecting our player base as well as yours we opened the floor to your diplomats. Some ideas were put forward but I was forced today to describe the parlay to a US member who was unable to attend as "trying to pick the corn from a turd" so I don't see why we should discuss this further the issue is yours, not ours and therefore the solution should be solved by the hierarchies within your alliance.


  7. It really tickles me to see these posts, when less than 12 months ago the US was on the brink (by a single clan) by the Pirates aided by the DSFS, Britain was under siege and the Dutch were in a never ending state of war for the Northern Coast of South America and nobody said anything and now the tables have turned and its a bloody soap opera in forums. The map wipe happened and what blossomed from the ashes of the "Pirate 2nd Coming" was a unified US nation and a united coalition that cooperates, communicates and mobilizes effectively to combat the multitude of enemies and even against questionable tactics, abuse of "exploits" #testing and strategic land grabs. we have managed to come out victorious. ..... so gg I suppose, better luck next map wipe.


    • Like 7
  8. Dear Devs and Community,

    After watching and re-watching the "Diplomacy Summit Stream", a few points caught my interest. One of these points in particular was raised by [EDR] Keirrip in regards to main fleets being entirely/partially screened from Port Battles in turn denying the player base the option to participate (or contest) in RvR. While I feel the owness should be on the attacker to make maximal effort to "win the day", I do believe that their is an issue in the game that allows smaller groups of frigates to engage considerably larger fleets of larger warships. My proposed Idea:

    CORE BATTLE FLEET COMMANDER FLAG - Purchasable In Port, allows designated commander the ability to nominate 15 Warships as "CORE" giving them immunity from tagging.

    THEORY: Two core battle fleets sail from neutral ports to the attacked port, the CORE fleets head straight to the port whilst the "Non CORE" fleet units must attempt to brave a potential blockade of screeners. Such tactics could be used like Counter Screening a Screening Fleet, Deploying Decoy Fleet units (Like awarded expendable Aggies etc.) to draw screeners etc.

    N/B- There would obviously have to be BR adjustments before this could be possible and Defenders could no longer sail from within the "Attacked" port


    Kind Regards,


    • Like 2
  9. 5 minutes ago, Fenris said:

    What does not matter is what you say. Because you have heard things and you were not there.


    Because the Dutch are trustworthy people and nobody would trust what you have to say father then they could throw you :)

  10. 2 hours ago, Bearwall said:

    lol not likely mate - I've done my part and I promised some guys I'd try to drive hostility at Santo Domingo - the night you took it.. I've tried that (and failed - thx for the battle btw) so now I'm a free guy - did what I promised and now can't be bothered.. I don't owe you any content, so let's see how much fun you will have in empty PBs..


    This is where im at as a US player trying to talk to tweedle-dum and tweedle-dee in this thread

  11. 11 minutes ago, Fenris said:

    You have no idea what are you talking about.

    Dude accidentally entered PB with 1st rate,and you are acting like he sunk half of your fleet with that ship.

    Were you even there?

    oh he didnt start attacking with that 1st after he entered???

  12. 7 minutes ago, Fenris said:

    Playing dirty? What did they do?


    I saw now 3 times similar posts from you about Danes "exploiting".Now tell me what did they do.

    1st Rate in 4th Port Battle Nuff said.

  13. 1 minute ago, Bearwall said:

    I think you should read a bit more mate.. you're getting rusty.. What I and the others have been saying is that we don't do PBs anymore.. I do recall inviting Christendom to an OW duel where I will sink his SORRY arse and mates..



  14. Just now, TommyShelby said:

    Just because others are being unreasonable you have to as well? 

    If you want Sensible/Reasonable discussions then you must contribute to it yourself. Otherwise nothing will change. 

    Because everyone is too proud, stubborn and ignorant to be dissuaded from their opinion and therefore will not see reason. so whats the point? Im at least conceding that locking PB's to weekends would help but nope "im wrong"

  • Create New...