Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Balck

Tester
  • Posts

    488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Balck

  1. Is a matter of logic, as a razee has a bigger hull and is also heavier than a constitution, due the hull in excess in the razee, that does not have the constitution if you see the photos, and the constitution is heavier because it has more armor, and I am talking about a razee with the same armor of a constitution. 

    Except your logic is faulty.  Especially concerning the two ships you're comparing.

  2. Unless the opposing team has also read the guide, and pulls to leeward, shooting at masts. The guide admits that this meta is practically unbeatable.

     

    So the admiral needs to engage in a game of chicken, feinting to leeward in order to make his opponent mirror the move, then stealing the wind with the smallest possible margin of error.

    Indeed.  The margin for error is even smaller in group battles because the discipline needed to retake the wind is seldom present.  

     

    The outcome of these battles can and is usually decided within the first two to five minutes.  Once wind is conceded it's lights out, merely a matter of time.  Shooting at masts is only effective if the charging team does to line astern rather than line abreast.

  3. Captains would still be brought to a military court on account of losing their ships, despite the outcome of the battles. This is the absolute opposite of the rewarding winning side even if you lose your ship. Obviously this cannot be modeled correctly for simple sea trial but could be included in the OW mode. Could be interesting to have such mechanics work along with "naval record" Reputation of sorts.

    Let's not get carried away...  

     

    What will constitute this board?  Will it be made up of players or will it be an automated mechanic?  The former will lead to politicking and acrimony, the latter will seldom hit the mark.  

     

    It may serve the RP players, to an extent, but the vast majority of people would find going to a "military court" thanks to actions in game a bit tedious to say the least.  

     

    Some things really don't add to the enjoyment of the game, this would be a waste of resources for little gain, in my humble opinion. 

    • Like 1
  4. Does the Navy describe her as 'seaworthy?' :huh:

     

    You realize she hasn't done anything except sail in a straight line since the 1930s? And since 1992-ish she just gets pushed around Boston harbor by tugboats with her topsails set.

     

    I'm trying to find a video of her sailing in the harbor without a tug along side, in which her sails are actually full and drawing, not sagged against the tops in a flat calm.

    Come on, I like her as much as the next guy but be honest with yourselves, Maturin's right.  She's a barge with masts for all intents and purposes at this point.  She hasn't sailed under her own power in decades.

     

    The title in this video tells you why the navy continues to call her sea worthy.

     

     

    Bragging rights over HMS Victory which is in truth the oldest commissioned warship in the world by several decades.  No tugboats means no more claiming the title with the dubious disclaimer.

×
×
  • Create New...