Kiknurazz91

71k VP for me and Germany had 16k after a 3 year war from 1928 to 1931. I only got 472 million in reparation's and not even an option of a province just outdated ships. So I choose 3 ships totaling 320 million in value and I get 1 in the end! The time invested in war in the campaign is not worth it. Fix this and make the wars fought in the campaign worth it! If the terms of surrender are not what we want we should have the option to reject the terms at the end until they are met.

Any word on the VP issue after battles I'm still getting minor victories even though I have triple the VP points. Also not getting a lot for the wars I fight even though it's still 30k+ to their 2k

That is what I did but it still didn't work it must have just been a glitch with my game at that moment I'll double check when I get home from work. I know how to use the ship design and play this game I spend more time on ship design than the game itself.

No I'm well aware certain years only have certain ship types available. As Japan in 1940 on custom battle I chose 1 BB and 1 BC when I went to design the BC it would only let me select BB hulls and not the BC hulls. I have not been on to see if it has been fixed so yes this was a bug.

As I stated in the post as an example 5 problems fixed and 10 more show up. Sure fixing/changing features is great and it's welcome (especially the alliance issue), adding new stuff awesome (border and territory colors was awesome), but the bugs make gameplay frustrating and it seems like more and more keep popping up with each update which is to be expected sure but it does get frustrating.

Its nice to see the improvements but I cant be the only person to notice this game takes 1 step forward and 2 steps back. Every time a new release is put out that fixes 5 problems 10 more show up. Its just kind of annoying really because its a great game but the bugs keep compounding making for a frustrating gaming experience.

Thanks for the updates it is needed especially with the alliance war issue. But has the Victory points issue been dealt with? I have never gotten a major victory even with 35k VP and they have 3k it is still a minor victory. Not to mention half the time I don't even get enough reparations' to make the war even worth the time I spent battling it. During my 4 year war I got 35k in VP and they had 3K I was awarded about $198,000,000 not even close to enough for a territory and just enough for one of their old battleships. I reduced their fleet from 109 ships to just 8 using my 54 ships, something just does not seem right.

At this point yes still enough to avoid. Custom battle has many bugs and the biggest complaint with the campaign still seems to be the victory rewards and the alliance issues. but it is a step in the right direction since this is only half of the fixes to the game from this beta will reevaluate after the rest of the beta release is out.

The map works just fine other than having to scroll all the way to the other side of the map to select a point in the pacific it is not bad. Adding maps based on nations really is the same as having a wrap around and adds more potential issues to the game.

In custom battle when selecting the option of having a BC it doesnt let you choose a BC hull only BB hulls

Ik everyone loves new hulls but don't you think at this point more hulls and features is mute. Fix the current bugs and gameplay imbalances before releasing any hulls or features that will make an already buggy game more buggy.

Update ETA?

Why is completely wiping an enemies navy and tanking their economy declared a minor victory??? I had 42000 VP and they had 3000 and it was a minor victory which netted me 189mil. This was a 6 year war and I GOT SCREWED! Fix the VP system and peace rewards please. War anymore is not worth the time between perpetual war and crap gains it makes the campaign not worth playing.

Nations dissolving in the middle of an invasion still an issue. 10 out of 11 turns done and the next turn they dissolve so I'm left with nothing please change. Also ungoverned territories should still be able to be invaded in my campaign the only nations left are me (japan), British, Americans, and Soviets this is boring as the soviets are an average of 1.5mil tons or more to invade so the options are limited as I can never compete with the British economy and fleet wise and the Americans really only have the mainland. This has created a very boring campaign as it takes FOREVER for dissolved nations to come back. The only reason the perpetual war has ended is due to the dissolving of nations with 2 years to go until 1950 I'm pretty much left with nothing to do but piss off the other countries left with no time to really do anyhting.

Add the ability to choose to go/not go to war with a country at war with a country you have a high standing with. Automatically being drug into a war with other countries just because your ally is is simply ridiculous. We did not join WW2 until we were attacked by japan even though 2 countries we had standing with were already in war with the axis. Also longer time than 1950

1) Perpetual war- 15 years and I have been at war with half the map before I can sign treaties more countries declare war I AM TIRED OF BEING AT WAR ALL THE TIME! I am on my 16th year of war with half the map it is getting boring. 2) Certain ships being drug into battles all the time- For example 2bb, 1bc, 3ca, 4dd all in the same port however only the CA and DD get drug out to naval battles, they are all in the same fleet why are they not ALL drug out????? 3) For having been fully released this game is far from ready. Looking through all these posts the majority are complaints about the game and not minor complaints at that gameplay ruining issues. The steam reviews are not entirely great either I understand the war in Ukraine but if game developers cannot do a full release without the major bugs people are having it should be paused. The campaign is ok but balancing issues and many others things make it unenjoyable. If I could get a refund I would in a heartbeat. 4) Auto battle- How can 4 CLs get sunk to 1 destroyer???? How can 3CAs, 4CLs, and 2DDs get sunk by a DD and CL. Keep in mind the enemy is using ships from the 1910s and 1920s and I am using 1930s top of the line ships. In the perpetual war that I am in auto battle is a great option but not with the issues mentioned above. Auto battle at this point is a joke.

Tip for your 1st and 2nd improvements: Hold ctrl and click on each ship you want to select it will allow you to select multiple ships but ctrl HAS to be held down until your done selecting

Fix the commissioning issue please half of my ships are stuck in "Commissioning01m" and have been for 6 months! Also again you cannot place any barbettes on the modern Japanese battleships past mid ship.

I noticed this too its like the line is on meth

Just got on after an extended break went to custom battles and my 1940s 86k ton bb got beat by a 1925 Japanese BB at like 35k tons something is not right! This is not enjoyable anymore the custom battles always had a more arcade type feel to it and now its too realistic and not enjoyable for me at least. You cant just play with a design and go the flaws are there now as well as fuel consumption if I wanna play with those mechanics ill do the campaign give me back the arcade type battles we could make in custom battles and leave the campaign for those people that want pure realism. Also creating an Iowa class BB is exceptionally hard with the given hulls. I wish I could get a refund and delete but I cant unfortunately.

Mark my words this is going to kill this game. Youtubers removing a game from their pages with as many followers as he has always has devastating impacts on the finances of the game. It happens all too often to potentially great games that the devs kind of lag behind on are forgotten about.

I'm out until this game gets fixed too many game breaking bugs. I understand the devs are having issues over there with the war and stuff but they need to at least implement a system where we can go back to a more stable version of the game even though it may have less features!

I have a large fleet in the south china sea, a small fleet up north by russia, and the rest are in harbor i stay to my side of the map and dont go past india.

I want to note as the Japanese I am 8 years into the campaign now and still have not been able to trigger a war with someone.

If yall want a world map fine whatever but there are some who dont and some of us want smaller campaign maps. Why is that so hard to accept some of us dont have the time to commit to a campaign that could take a month. If this was a sandbox game you could do a full campaign from 1890 to 1940 in less than a couple days its a realism based game simple as that. I just started playing a campaign today starting at 1890 and after 4 solid hours im only at 1898 theres so much to do and manage on a global scale it makes it tedious.