shunt
-
Posts
148 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by shunt
-
-
28 minutes ago, admin said:
whats the current going price for doubloons? Tortue and/or Port royal
expensive ... i was going to say if you played the game you would know ,,, then realised who I was replying to so I guess you dont buy them ?
-
13 hours ago, admin said:
We did not see positive spike in reviews after we added Implacable as crafted and tested De Ruyter in event. We consider that nobody cared for crafted ships anymore. Perhaps those who care about new ships did not update the reviews should do so if they are interested in de Ruyter as crafteable. If they stay silent they give the reviews to be ruled by vocal haters who just circle jerk each other. Positive reviews always get less likes, while haters group up always favoriting negative sentiment.
As this is business and teams shift to popular projects from unpopular projects NA team gets developers based on the reviews. To plan ahead I need to see how much resources i will have available and will have to consider hiding some content behind events. Here is how it works : Higher reviews - more developers, lower reviews - less developers (including dutch ship creators). So dutch players can make an effort to encourage artists by actually 1) saying thank you in reviews or 2) saying they are pissed off in reviews.
We have not said that it is not going to be crafteable. But we will keep it for future occasions. Right now there is no point to add it as it seems nobody wants it. If players wanted it they would appreciate it in reviews.so unless we say good things about the game and you as developers ,, no more development ,,, ?? we now have to beg for things in the form of positive reviews as well as pay you ???
i dont mind doing one or the other but both ??
-
1
-
-
havoc griefing is allowed its when they are on the receiving end its banned
-
4
-
-
CID is such a busy man how does he find time ,,, extorting Brits ,, threatening Dutch,, hiding from russians and begging sweden
-
1
-
-
42 minutes ago, Never said:
I never said it was LAMA alone. I was talking to you specifically, where you at the battles? not just for SDC but for Les Cayes, Saint Nic, PoP? Where you there? did you put money into it? cause it's you here complaining about it like you are owed something.
me as an individual ...??? yeah i grinded hostility for sdc and was in the port battle when they took it ... les cayes i was there saint nic no and PaP isnt lamas i contributed cm and doubies to my clan and my clan contributed to building SDC ... I wear size 10 shoes ,, have 3 kids and no mortgage ,, anything else you would like to know
however Im not speaking for my own benefit but for GB players benefit ... maybe you are hapy that they will leave game if clans are kicked from LAMA friends list .. you can maybe be happy playing game with no enemy
-
4 minutes ago, Liq said:
This is not about SJ. Truxillo however, if it went through and that Saltpetre guy wasn't as incompetent, would have remained tied to CRC, confirmed alt clan, without us being able to do anything about it - except getting a bunch of british alts and having an Alt Warfare
Maybe it is indeed time to add Clan-Wars. Together with fixed hostility missions (Other nations cant grind the hostility anymore for a different nation), an 1 man alt clan should have a hard time flipping a port himself.
we cant even attack sdc with alts ... trux you could have ,, sj i was open to attack
-
the best option would have to wait until sdc was atatcked by npc raid then get another nation to screen lama out so it went neutral ,,, unfortunatly too many GB clans believed CID giving his word that he would drop it was enough ... now npc raid is gone ,, cid goes back on his word
-
1
-
-
shortest route to sdc is through Baracoa i doubt WTF will give that up to let another nation attack SDC .. ir we have to give up st nics another LAMA port PE AND 2 OR 3 other ports ,, before sdc can be attacked
sweden could do it through GT but would still need to take 4-5 ports to reach SDC and they have enough of our ports as it is
-
1 minute ago, erelkivtuadrater said:
your solution is to pay a clan from an other nation to capture the port and hand it over to any of your other prefered clans. (trustissues inc)
hey great idea .... if you inderstand the mechanics of the game try and work out how many ports we need to give up to another nation before they can attack .. SDC ,and then whats the guarantee they hand it over ?
-
1 hour ago, Never said:
The people trading into are able to do so because LAMA was there to take the ports around it to make that possible. Tax is 10%, the ones getting really rich are the traders. Where those players there to build SDC or defend it or help take ports that allow rich trade in SDC? I don't think so.
you think that lama took those ports all by themselves and built all the defences and port bonus features alone ... GB as a nation took SDC there was more than just LAMA in that port battle ,,, other clans helped grinding hostility GB Clans contributed victory marks, doubloons and combat medals to LAMA to build the defenses and port bonuses ... then LAMA decide to go Prussian and hold us hostage with the threat of dropping clans from friends list ...a lot of players have lvl 3 ship yards in SDC and its not a simple matter to go build another elsewhere ,,, the effort and grinding to get CMs and doubloons to build up SDC and build a lvl 3 shipyard will drive players out of the game . if KRAKES actions force them to do it again elsewhere.... its one thing to lose a port to an enemy ..to be held hostage by another nation is another ... Krake clan over the weekend demanded all the ports from la navasse to Sale trou . the entire les cayes region . in exchange for SDC ... if GB captians are still active in LAMA how do Krake have the ability to make this offer ????
@admin Krake are driving youur customers out of the game with their actions
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Teutonic said:
you want to continue stating CRC is not an alt clan of BASTD Members? we have a lot of evidence to say the contrary :).
in any event, Devs have found a solution that should solve the major issue most of us had with the "way" truxillo was flipped (which also contrary to popular belief was different from San Juan).
all im claiming is CRC is a swedish clan... whether there are any members of BASTD in it is irrelevant ,, maybe crc members have their alts in Bastd .. same as you cant prove which were alts and which were mains in Havoc sewe and havoc dk
it was exactly the same ,,
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, Liq said:
Because it was our port initially and there is no ingame mechanic to trade ports to another nation? There were also no alts involved?
It wouldnt have made a difference if we let them on the friendlist.
Same stuff happened at Santo Domingo. LIONS changed to Prussia from Dutch and handed over the port. I dont see anything wrong with that.
lol your arguments get weaker and weaker
theres no in game mechaniccs to trade a port to another nation
are you sure
you seem pretty expert at trading ports to spanish
Trux was traded to sweden ,,, just you dint like the clan it was traded to
you can actually fight for it
there is 3 mechanics
as for no alts involved are you seriiously asking us to believe that Havoc sailed out of SJ with all there ships went to a neutral port and switched nations ... I dont beleive you mate ..
no one in havoc swe had a havoc dk alt or vice versa ???
lmao
Im sorry mate ,, you must believe we are stupid and all your doing is making yourself look stupid
-
3
-
-
18 hours ago, Liq said:
Just defending myself to what BS is being brought up regarding SJ, whereas trux was clearly alt abused
we shall see what the admins decide.
what amazing hypocrisy CRC is a swedish clan ,,, trux would have belonged to sweden ,,, your actually claiming its abuse that a swedish clan capturing trux stopped a swedish clan capturing trux
yet in your eyes its ok for Havoc to switch from dane to sweden and prevent danes defending in port battle
the only people that have a right to be upset by trux is GB
same as danes should be upset by sj
they are both exactly the same
-
3
-
-
8 minutes ago, Liq💋 said:
are you serious or trolling?
why is that trolling its a question I see no rules that say an alt cant own a port ,,,
define an alt ... i can make any account my main
-
@admin you really need to sort out this game with regards alts ... seems there is one rule for some and different rules for others ,,, Trux is no different to San Juan ,, unless Havoc can prove ,, that no one in Danish Havoc had a swedish alt and no one in swedish havoc had a danish alt ...
did the guys who attacked San juan really sail all their ships and goods out of san juan to a neutral port and then change nations ,, and then sail it all the waty back ,,, hilarous if you suggest so ... they just used alts and traded the ships and goods between them after port was taken ... we all know it
second point Santiago de cuba is owned by by a prussian clan ,,, using GB alts ,,, as a nation we can do nothing about this we cant attack it or force them to hand it over ,, our ship yards and choice of port bonus and ultimatley its defence are at the mercy of a prussian clan ..
you made a ruling about this before at Bluefields when a Gb clan left and joined dutch nation ,,, suprise suprise some of the players who are now in Havoc crying about Trux ,,,, you said at the time it was a s game intended and clans own ports not nations ...
so Bastd owned truxillo not GB if we decide to hand it to another clan from another nation its our choice and certainly not another nations choice who gets the port ..
so lama go prussian and still own SDC because they have left alts in nation ,, thats fine ...
HAVOC go swedish still own SAN JUAN but leave alts in danish clan thats fine
yet Bastd clan memebers go swedish and leave alts in Bastd but thats not fine ,,,
so whats an alt is CRC captain a swedish captain with an alt in GB or a GB captain with an alt in sweden ... how do you decide which is main and which is alt
when havoc took san juan which were alts and which were main ... the only person who can decide that is the player ...
just shows you what a can of worms this is
so sort out SDC ,,, any potential ruling against BASTD should apply to havoc
-
7
-
-
2 hours ago, Liq💋 said:
Still waiting to see BASTD change to sweden and join their new clan CRC
oh wait...
so no one but BASTD has alts in other nations ???
why cant an alt own a port ?
-
why busted ?
it is common knowledge
-
swedes lose its bad game design ,,, who would have thought that
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Chromey said:
no pls, reason is that people with tons of alts will create tons of clans and have unlimited ships on hand.
if you have an alt you can dock 60 ships ,,,60 or 600 doesnt make a difference ,,
-
so everyone is a liar apart from you ,,
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:
BR for port battles are still too high.
People wishing to participate in RvR continue to move to nations that have shown a capability to field large fleets because they are a necessity to be competitive.
BR needs to be lowered to give smaller nations a chance to compete and to give an incentive for people to move to smaller nations.
lowering the BR further would lead to elitism and the same few players competing against each other and the majority of thos wishing to partake never getting a chance .. If you cant field a port battle fleet I wouldnt attack other nations simple
-
2
-
-
48 minutes ago, Archaos said:
So is the rest true?
yeah its all true ,,,,
-
1
-
-
Disagree with op ... Friends list is vital to stop rogue clans in nation ,,, if a rrogue clan appears in nation we have some control over what they can achieve ,, a better soloution is increase the number of friends available
allowing enemies to continue building ships in a port you take is also a bad idea ... whats the point of attacking a port if it doesnt effect your enemies ship building capacity
your front line mechanics idea is polar opposite to your ship building complaint ... this would allow anyone to attack a nations ship building ports and lead to what ever nation is zerg at the time to control all ship building in the game
for example if at the moment russia controlled all ship building ports they could dismantle all port bonus in ports that are used by other nations while keeping bonus in the ports that are exclusively theirs .. whats the point of a lvl 3 shipyard that has no port bonus
Santiago is an oddity its a good ship building port 55 points but will always be on the fron line and open to attack ,,, those that built lvl 3 shipyards there should have understood the dangers ..
-
GB is a zerg .... lol
GB has a high population ........ a high population of alts .... i would guess a good 30 % of GB population is other nations alts ... we have a high % of casual non clan players and noobs
its easy to see look a clan membership v nation membership there is a massive difference
-
2
-
This is not about SJ. Truxillo however, if it went through and that Saltpetre guy wasn't as incompetent, would have remained tied to CRC, confirmed alt clan, without us being able to do anything about it - except getting a bunch of british alts and having an Alt Warfare
GB vs Spain War.
in Caribbean News
Posted
seems to me that sweden have broken the peace treaty betwenn russia and sweden ,,, which I understand to have said neither side was to interfere with GB V spain war other than screening