chailang
-
Posts
163 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by chailang
-
-
Just now, Bach said:如果瑞典把它送给大不列颠呢？
那我们也同意. 因为它是瑞典的
-
Just now, Arsilon said:
雪兰，请问你的瑞典同行在这里张贴他们的要求吗？
我已经告诉他们了，他们会在晚一些来回复这个线程
-
3 minutes ago, Barbancourt (rownd) said:
鉴于以各种方式使我们达成这项协议的巨大努力和挫折，至少在开幕之际，我们至少可以非常努力地看到它有效吗？按照同意的方式，Leewards / Bovenwinds成为Sveedish的路线似乎对我来说颇具挑剔的技术性。我们正在创造更多不必要的坏血，争论一周的区域所有权价值并不完全符合我们的预期，而且当我们无法在更加适应的情况下讨论这些细节时，看起来协议并不完全是真诚的方式。如果斯威士兰肉丸在一个星期内没有认真地采取这些地区，那么我们真的可以开始关心条约的长期性质。在此期间，也许CCCP可以直接离开Bovenwind，直到Sweedish完成进入Leewards，作为想要这样做的姿态。
协议上写着，港口属于瑞典，即瑞典有权分配他们，这个地区不是法国人的.我们的行为是经过瑞典同意的。
法国人同不同意，或者开不开心，与我们无关.
我希望法国人不要再干涉我们和瑞典的外交.
-
1小时前，Slamz说：
[谷歌翻译：“然后，我们开始帮助法国按照协议启动CM，但我们的敌意总是被法国减少，我们无法准确控制敌意，导致过早产生的港口战斗（我们的错）”]
英文的谎言这谎言
我们在ICS团队中有人说，他们正在谈论在清晨CCCP翻转它。ICS想要这个，因为他们可以有更多的人在线，而且他们不高兴，其他法国部族正在让这么多人进入港口战役。我们已经用自己的耳朵听到了这一点，所以要么是说谎，要在你自己的队伍中有叛徒，谁做了这个“意外”并且对你说说（我们并没说过什么时间段激活CM，但是我们努力在你们的时间段激活，你们主动降低敌意导致我们无法判断
[谷歌翻译：“BT和GT确实要回到法国，但我们的船还没有撤退在港口等待1-2天撤退”]
你的借口是可悲的..是否你可以使用中立端口？或者您可以在丹麦港口进一步航行10分钟。不要把我们当成白痴的孩子（我们需要上班/上学 有些人有事情无法上线，他们需要时间
CCCP告诉我们，我们不会让BT和GT回到“外交系统退回”之前，这是我们攻击的最后原因（这是在你们攻击之后说的，我清楚的记得
我不知道你是否认为你所说的一切都是真实的，你们下面的人欺骗了你，或者如果你有目的地向每个人撒谎，并认为我们都很愚蠢地意识到这一点（报告人身攻击
认为所有这一切都是因为CCCP失去了一个货船。（超过10条印度人
所有这些.3个多星期的战争和页面的荒谬的帖子和来回交易， 因为CCCP在PvP服务器上丢了一艘货船。（被“盟友”偷袭击沉10条以上
我希望他们违反这个协议，所以我们可以和他们战争。他们比我们的“朋友”更像是敌人一样危险。
其他的法国部族只是出于尊重，清除今晚不会打倒路镇。
-
25 minutes ago, Slamz said:
我再次重复,港口依靠协议不是你法国的 闭嘴
-
第一天： 法国人（BORK+ICS)攻击了我们的Indian。 我联系Eirl two询问情况 ,他说法国将会开一个会议讨论这个问题 （这时候是我们晚上12点
第二天： 我发现Eirl two删除了账号.... 我们十分生气，认为是BORK和ICS赶走了他（误会已经消除），我们攻击了法国的港口和商船
不知道第几天： BORK（条顿）和ICS（巴博萨）主动联系我们，他们都声称能代表法国，他们要求和平,我们发送了两份一样的协议, 他们都同意了
随后我们开始按照协议 帮助法国激活CM 但是我们的敌意总是被法国降低, 我们无法准确的控制敌意，导致了过早的生成了港口战斗（我们的错）
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
然后我们听说法国发生了内战 ：ICS和其他CLAN内战 （我并不明白为什么会发生这种事情....）
BT和GT确实要归还法国 但是我们的船还在港口中没有撤退 想等待1-2天进行撤退
但是突然法国人再次袭击了我们的Indian.. 要求归还BT和GT.
我们确实准备要还给法国港口,但是这次突然袭击打破了和平协议，让我们不再想归还港口.（ICS一直承认这个和平协议到现在，并且一直保持良好的沟通,解决出现的问题)
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
之后还发生了和Duncan沟通出现问题，导致Duncan告诉了你们我们同意了和平
我再想想还有什么没有说到的
啊 还是不会用@
It's four in the morning, and I'm going to bed.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Arsilon said:
It might be helpful to have Taurus post in here that they are ceding their claims to those ports to the Swedes maybe?
Also, feel free to send it in Chinese then Chailang -- we do have people that can help translate on our side possibly.
ok Thank you
-
50 minutes ago, Rabman said:
All of this because they want marks. Who knows when they will turn them over to Sweden and even if they will, what with the tacked on "when the alliance system comes out" clause they added to the original ICS deal. It's behavior that is not written in the agreement, and is clearly a violation of the agreement. Rather than trying to build a bridge of understanding, its more rhetoric. We can all be losers to GB if that's your preference @chailang
The previous agreement was a misunderstanding. If you want to listen, I can tell you (my English is not very good Maybe I can't make myself clear
-
40 minutes ago, Rabman said:
All of this because they want marks. Who knows when they will turn them over to Sweden and even if they will, what with the tacked on "when the alliance system comes out" clause they added to the original ICS deal. It's behavior that is not written in the agreement, and is clearly a violation of the agreement. Rather than trying to build a bridge of understanding, its more rhetoric. We can all be losers to GB if that's your preference @chailang
First, the port of agreement is Swedish, and they have the right to distribute it
Second, the Swedes wanted us to turn over the ports
Third, the Swede can take it away from us at any time
-
2
-
-
14 minutes ago, Davos Seasworth said:
Enough. Dont be taking the moral high ground or a saintly position of just when France has done nothing but the same arrogant, trade choking, dishonorable actions as you call the Danes and Swedes out for.
There only seems to be only three people of France even talking here and that is @Bach @Teutonic the diplomatic representative of ICS and the other smaller factions such as ROVER and WO. Even @Duncan McFail himself should continue to be involved till the end .
I think ICS is the most honor clan in France.
-
Just now, Dharus said:
Absolutely. Nothing better than beating of someone with no honor.
We don't need French people to honor us
-
1
-
-
Just now, Dharus said:
French took those ports because of Danish and Swedish arrogance. Now you want to risk alienation of France on that? You willing to risk another pointless war because the 2 members of Sweden dont like France? You might want to think about your moves.
So you risk it? hahahhahaha
-
Just now, Dharus said:
You do not speak for Sweden.
Can you?
454 and benny didn't like the French, so they asked us to flip the port quickly
The port belongs to Sweden, which is a matter of Denmark and Sweden, not French
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, Slamz said:
I can speak for myself and direct my own guild.
Attacking a French port is not an "internal affair". Any French are also free to attend that port battle in defense. If you attack any ships in that port battle you will be in violation of the treaty and will owe those captains an apology and 125% of the value of their ship.
Agreement says you cannot sink French ships.
It does not say we cannot attend our own port battles.
We agreed to give the ports to Sweden. You are not Sweden.
A French delegate, please. I don't want an clan representative to talk to me
If you can't stand for your country, please shut up
The port belongs to Sweden in accordance with the treaty, and the Swedes require us to turn it over
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Slamz said:
I can speak for myself and direct my own guild.
Attacking a French port is not an "internal affair". Any French are also free to attend that port battle in defense. If you attack any ships in that port battle you will be in violation of the treaty and will owe those captains an apology and 125% of the value of their ship.
Agreement says you cannot sink French ships.
It does not say we cannot attend our own port battles.
We agreed to give the ports to Sweden. You are not Sweden.
ok
-
Just now, Slamz said:
Yes you have explained that you lack authority to make decisions. I understand now.
Do you have any rights? You can't control ics
You can't interfere in our internal affairs.
-
19 minutes ago, Slamz said:
Thank you, I was not aware that @Duncan McFail was guildleader of CCCP. I will talk to him.
You are making it very difficult for France to ever assist Pirates in a war.
France will not help those who stab us in the back and hide behind a loophole. We are not lawyers who craft perfect treaties and no doubt you can find other loopholes. But there will be no more treaties if this is how things are going to be with CCCP and BLACK.
Duncan is a middleman
-
18 minutes ago, Bach said:
I repeat, this is our diplomacy with Sweden
If you are unhappy, please go to Duncan
-
4 minutes ago, Slamz said:
You must recognize you are creating bad relations with France.
If you attack Bovenwinds you are creating a situation where it is impossible for France to cooperate with Denmark or Pirates in future deals. Are you trustworthy or not? We will know depending on what you do with Bovenwinds. We consider this a violation of the spirit of our agreement and we will not make future agreements with people who act like this.
You should be focused on helping the Pirates, rather than angering France again to create yet another war.
I repeat, this is our diplomacy with Sweden
If you have any complaints, please go to Duncan
-
1 hour ago, The Red Duke said:
Please READ this carefully ALL of you, including Danes. Just to avoid misunderstandings...
Sweden attacks the regions and flips them. Not Danes.
Thank you.
The swedes agreed
Don't interfere in our diplomacy
thank you
-
2
-
-
CCCP agrees with peace
-
4
-
-
Denmark-Norge status update
Verenigde-Provincien: Neutral
Espana: Neutral
France: War
Great Britain: Neutral
United States: Neutral
Sverige: Neutral
Pirates: Alliance-
2
-
-
Just now, Bach said:
CCCP
Who attacked the Allies first? The French attacked allies first, and we never attacked the French tread
-
3 minutes ago, Bach said:
CCCP broke alliance. CCCP flipped Bridgetown early in secret deal to deny North American French CMs.
CCCP broke alliance not The Purge. The Purge honored the alliance until CCCP broke it. We want our ports back and we want your huge trade fleets out of French ports.
Who broke the alliance？ Who attacked the Allies first?
-
1
-
White Peace - France-Denmark Trade Conflict ends
in Caribbean News
Posted
建立一个中国论坛（正在施工）
培训更多的新人，教会他们基础的技巧