[Easy way to balance server]

Why not just remove the port bonuses, RvR was working before they were introduced and there is too much ship customization anyways...

[OW ROE for PZ not working properly]

3 hours ago, admin said:

Patrols should have bigger battles - that's how we want them. You do non like it fine, we did no like how they all became 1v1 or 2v2 affairs. 
 

We have had plenty of bigger battles with roughly balanced BR with the open world ROE:

While with the new ROE you end up with stuff like this:

[NPC Port Battles Explained. War server and Peace server information]

1 minute ago, Cetric de Cornusiac said:

Sounds like a lot happened since 5 years ago in AI development; you should revisit NPC fights because "turning in circles" isn't all you will see.

In addition they learned how to sit in the wind and reverse back and forth.

[NPC Port Battles Explained. War server and Peace server information]

So the solution to people not doing RvR is, that NPCs are going to do the port battles instead...

[Handel - Produktion von national goods (free towns)]

Das Tradertool scheint contracts allgemein nicht zu berücksichtigen.

[Das spielt gerät aus den Fugen]

Ich sehe nicht ganz wie BR-Limit Abwechslung bringen soll, klar es werden dann keine homogenen 1st-/4th-Rate Flotten mehr rumfahren. Aber letztendlich wird es doch eh wieder eine Kombination geben, die die Beste ist und die dann jeder fährt. Zudem solange die Mehrheit der Schiffe SoLs sind, hat eine Fregatte oder gar etwas kleineres keine wirkliche Möglichkeit Einfluss zu nehmen und dann könnte man auch auf sie verzichten.

[Testbed national news]

Why not just make alliances, like on the real server, just need to get kind of an overview how many ppl are in each nation, so things can get somewhat balanced.

[Screening action and rewards]

First fix screening, make that only a force that is able to put up a fight against the PB fleet, can drag it. 

[My 2-cents on port battles]

And then we are back to sit every evening in your ports and be ready for an attack that might come or not, if you want to keep them. Atleast for me the flag system was the reason to stop playing in july, because it was just taking too much time.

[Duel week?]

When thinking about radical changes, can we maybe take out Bots completely for a week?

[Development plans for conquest mechanics (RVR)]

who says they have to fight for them? It just means they can no longer attack them for the time being (plus can use their ports).

then wait for your forced alliance to "time out" and seek revenge! (if you want)

thing is, hey we got completely destroyed by this nation, now were allied to them and we can join their PBs. Lets just enter all of their PBs with 25 of the smallest allowed ships and ruin everything.

[Surrender and Cowards]

Surrendering should only be possible if the ship is not sinking. That would get rid of people surrendering just seconds before they sink. Maybe it could be added, that you can surrender when your ship is taking on water if you have a repair kit left. it would automatically repair the ship after surrendring then.

[PRELIMINARY TREATY OF THE ANTILLES, COMMERCE AND FREE NAVIGATION, valid as soon as the four nations sign]

Why do we constantly have to discuss events that happened weeks ( or months?) in the past? Its not gonna change anything nor is anyone changing his mind. So why discuss things over and over again?

[Nations should rally against the Pirates before its too late!]

When a nation is down to a few ports and so knows where the next pb is, MAN UP & DEFEND!

If you are at high enough rank to defend your ports but refuse to, why do you play a nat? Might as well turn black.

I play pirate bc I give diddly about conquest (although do take part in pbs for loot). I do not like seeing a black map but would rather see healthy nations who feel comfy cozy so I can hunt their players.

What is so pathetic is not seeing national players, especially from large clans, not defend the few ports remaining. (Looking back to when pirates did some USA stomping.)

Right now it is too easy to rebuild. Hopefully when conquest gets reworked & ports are of more importance I'll hear of people defending their ports instead of empty pbs. (By then pirates probably will not be involved in conquest)

 

 

The simple truth is: RvR/map conquest is a 12 hour/day job.

It is a fun ride for a while, but eventually, every job becomes boring.

[RNoN, accused of high treason.]

We as clan VIE would like to support this.

We now that this not exactly against the game rules, but this case should maybe help showing how very needed diplomacy ingame.

We feel a group of people is trying to undermine the things we have achieved between both nations and therefore ruin the game for the

majority of the nation.

[{EU1}draft (non clan made) of British Peace Treaty with The Pirates and the Danes]

No, just no.

There is no pirate nation, or even Denmark nation. There is the hidden "Russian" nation.

That continues to use game breaking loop holes to win their battles.

Making multiple steam accounts and alts so they can enter port battles that are limited to 25 players and then promptly leaving? So as to limit the actual number of ships of the line above 3rd that we can field? Yep, they have done it. Multiple times now.

Working as a "nation" between pirates and Denmark just because they believe themselves as the "Russian" nation? Yep they are doing that.

Until NA figures out how to make sure there is 1 account, 1 player, per IP address, there is never going to be balance in this game. These are game breaking tactics being used to win this "false" war.

Just out of interest do you have any proove of that?

[Der Grind, was machen die Dänen anders?]

Alles eine Frage der Zeit die man willens ist oder in das Spiel stecken kann, würde ich sagen.

[News From The Danes]

The same counts for PvP1 aswell, we have agreements between major clans, but we cant control every single player of our nation. Im sorry what happened to you.

[Das Problem der Zeitfenster (Portbattle)]

Das der Server EU heißt bedeutet nur, dass er dort steht, nicht, dass er nur für Europäer ist. Ich kenne zwar nicht die genauen Zahlen, aber ich denke das der Anteil der Amerikaner hier bestimmt nicht klein ist. Zudem sollte man bedenken, dass es am Anfang nur diesen PvP Server gab, sodass man gezwungen war hier zu leveln, weswegen auch wenig Leute bereit waren, alles aufzugeben, um auf einem US Server zu spielen. Ich persönlich wäre auch nicht bereit zu wechseln, nur weil jemandem meine Zeiten nicht passen.

[Sweden starts an major Offensive against Danes]

So where is that major offensive of Sweden?

[Fragen zum Spiel]

Hallo und guten Tag,

als Neuling in der Seeschiffahrt  und in diesem Spiel habe ich folgendes Problem:

Ich habe Naval Action üner STEAM erworben. Ich finde leider kein Optionsmenü, um Tastaturbelegung oder Grafikeinstellungen zu ändern. Bei Start über STEAM gibt es keinen sog. Gamelauncher.

Habe ich etwas übersehen ?

Wenn Esc drückst, dann kommt ein Menü mit Optionen unteranderem...

[Battle reports, wo?]

Eventuell in National News, aber auf Englisch?

[The Battle for Barahona]

Why should we set timers that fit the brits and not us, when the brits always set timers that dont fit us? Why should we fight the pirates when we already have enough nations to fight, they dont present a thread atm.

[Vest-Indiske Escadre (West Indies Squadron of Denmark-Norway)]

Herminator should be pleased now 

[Fragen zum Spiel]

Man kann nur bis Rank 3 AI Fleets kaufen