-
Posts
27 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Vlade lArkl
-
-
We can target this group if we wish within the game however we will always use legitimate tactics. Such as attacking their flag carrier or fighting them in the open waters.
The issue isn't whether or not you can fight the group its the "legitmate" tactics of purchasing flags to prevent someone else in the "nation" from attacking. We are not talking about the enemy such as the danes or the bits buy a flag with a spy we are talking about griefing players in the current game mechanics.
-
Everyone agrees that there is some broken game mechanics in here, but instead of dealing with that matter in a respectable and just way, they use the tribunal for their own personal gain.
If that is not an exploit then I don't know what is.
The use of forums to pursue manhunts instead of fighting them on the open world is destroying the game.
According to the guidelines about tribunals
What is tribunal? It is a section of the forum where the community can bring forward cases showing players exploiting/un-sportmanshiplike behavior/players of low moral standing/etc.
-I think keeping players from playing the game and buying flags to prevent said players from attacking meets this criteria.-
In this topic you can post in the following format:
3) Toxic behavior - Report ingame (right click name and select report)
4) Game breaking exploit found by yourself - F11-bug report (just press 'F11' ingame)
5) Other people exploiting/Damage farming - Screenshots + Tribunal topic
6) Griefing - Screenshots + Tribunal topic
This post meets criteria on several levels.
1) So it is ok for a small 10 man guild to do their utmost to cause dissent in the entire Pirate Nation but not all-right for us to target them in an attempt to prevent them from doing so?
So you admit to targeting ports to prevent FTS from attacking.
-
its a matter of who controls the timer. which I stated in chat, Valco didnt link that part, if we take them from the danes we can put a timer on them easy for the danes to regain, fts's timer will be at 4am for the danes making it annoying to retake.
So you bought two flags in order to prevent Valco from taking the ports and setting the timers so that his clan can defend that sounds like griefing to me.
Evidence? all I see here is USA and British players along with FTS, trying to get me and zombie, and Kutai's account wiped, Kutai who wasnt even home when we purchased the flaggs.
The evidence is in the screen shots and the actions take by you and your comrades. I am not worried about your punishment I just want a ruling on the griefing against other players and the flag purchase mechanic.
-
1). We also do not want FTS to have that port and be in charge of the timer as they have made a mess of every port they have taken and defended so far. So yes the Danes SHOULD retake it.
2)We intended to attack Jamaica. The day before FTS took all of the ports to prevent us from doing this and swapped them to timers we could not defend so the Brits could easily take them back and set timers.
1) That statement alone means you targeted a clan within your faction in an effort to grief them/prevent them from continuing its attacks. It is not up to you to decide what pirate clans can and cannot do.
2) And this point is also irrelevant the difference is FTS actually took those ports. They didn't purchase the flags just to keep you from attacking. FTS is a US time zone clan the timers were set according to that so that we could on for the defense. How successful or unsuccessful someone is is irrelevant as long as an attempt was made to capture the port.
- 1
-
And lost the other 2 battles for the other ports.
-
This thread isn't about pirate green on green, it's about blatant griefing, same way it's been done and condemn previously.
I say add them to the list of people awaiting sentencing.
Agreed we were getting off topic regardless if you can open world fight this still is griefing of the flag mechanic.
-
Pirate can fight pirate, and stay within the current rules. I'm not talking about green on green.
-
You are absolutely right. This is just an example of poor pirate mechanics which leads to these sort of actions.
Seems legit to me within current *pirate* mechanics.
These are the current green on green rules for these mechanics. And this is what is "legit".
-
I was under the impression that pirates are able to attack and fight each-other. Am I in error?
I will refer you to the tribunal sticky's.
-
The evidence is very clear that those flags were purchased in order to grief. It kept the clan from continuing with their assaults due to abuse of this game mechanic. I would love to get a admins opinion for this.
- 1
-
Splinters and burning wrecks any pictures are good pictures.
- 1
-
Valid post for a good win, no spam here.
- 1
-
How is this any different than Rubli and KOTO working with the Danish Clans?
Pirates buy a flag against Jeremie and then an hour later the Danes buy another Flag.
Pirates are NOT A NATION! Pirates are like mercenaries and should be on no Nations Side, but always serving their own agenda.
Love this response pirates are a nation built for fighting. Kathura has even gone so far on his high coalition throne to declare a kill on sight order for all FTS. So instead of furthuring a nation he cry's for fighting between clans.
-
I'm so excited to hit the sea's again time will just creep on by! I sit here while its snowing dreaming of a warmer climate.
-
Yarr? Yeah Yarr.....
-
Battles are certainly more populated leading to some really fun engagements.
-
Maybe they can get the funding one can only hope. Or maybe the government could just pay for it build a couple less tanks or somthing to preserve a nations monument.
-
Man thats pretty
-
Well I can see how that would certainly cause some injury..
-
It really is a sad story I loved seeing the Constitution since I live in the states but would love to see this massive beast of war.
Good News for Pirate Community, King just born and his name is Bigvalco :
in National news
Posted
Fun as always