Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Diesel

Members2
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Diesel

  1. 30 minutes ago, SodaBit said:

    Pretty serious campaign bug here.
    Just finished my first engagement against the French in my 1940's Germany campaign. 1 French BC and 6 CL's sunk for 2 BB's mildly inconvenienced, pretty decent result. Got ~8k victory points out of it, but there's a problem.
    tZe77wO.png
    Despite the French having very clearly lost that battle, I Didn't Get 8k Victory Points From It.
    ijMa4Un.png

    The French Got 8k Victory Points.
    If this keeps up, in order to win against the French, I would have to lose every battle, which would mean losing the war in general. I'm pretty sure that's not how modern warfare works.

    I have encountered the same problem against the Austrians as the Italians. With this bug the campaign is pretty much unplayable right now.

  2. I have encountered a significant problem when playing as Italy in 1890.  Every victory I have the game seems to identify as Austrian victory. For example the victory screen says 4k victory points for me (Sunk 2Bs and 2 CAs while losing 3 TBs) but back on the campaign Austria gets 4k VPs and some prestige, while my own Prestige plummets and my Unrest goes up.

    I restarted the campaign as Italy, but in the next battle the same thing happend.

  3. 1 hour ago, DougToss said:

    The real test of a scoring system would be Jutland - the British lost more ships, but the blockade held, the Germans stayed in port, starved, mutinied and surrendered.

     

    So scoring should be part tactical factors, part operational, and part strategic. 

    I agree. Britain can afford to lose a few dreadnoughts and battlecruisers while Germany can't. As long as one nation is still easily able to control the seas they shouldn't surrender easily. On the other hand Jutland was  a pretty bad propagandistic blow to the British for a while, so it would make sense that Britain would be unable to take three Jutlands in a row without suing for peace even if they are able to sill maintain a blockade.

    • Thanks 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Nick Thomadis said:

     

    Do you remember if the enemy had too few ships in their main fleet? We will fix this.

    Had the same issue in 1910, 1920 and 1930. Britain loses the first engagement, a heavy cruiser or two and some smaller stuff gets sunk and they sue for peace in turn 2 or 3 despite outnumbering me 2-1 in heavy units and 3-1 in cruisers and still being able to maintain the blockade.

     

    Also repair costs are pretty ridiculous for the larger surface units. A one month repair to get some 5' paint scratches out of a Dreadnought currently cost 12kk bucks.

  5. 4 hours ago, ReefKip said:

    Anyone else got enemy DD's that simply refuse to sink and sit at 1% floatability despite getting penned and flooded again and again by 11 inch guns?

    It seems the damage sytem currently favours small ships far more then big ships.Especially where flooding damage is concerned.

    Can't wait until they have added accurate damage models for ships interior modules. right now it seems the interior is just a damage zone that gives random crits to shells that penetrate through it. an example is a shell hitting a mid ships taking out a turret at the front which is physically impossible. location of penetration does not matter much. Exception to this rule seem to be torpedoes that always only damage the area they hit.

     

    My own TBs have survived laughable amounts of damage as well. If an 15 inch torpedo hits a 200t TB it should be blasted to bits, but instead they tend to make it. Some have survived multiple hits with 11/12 inch HE as well. There should be some fix for that at some point.

    In addition to that heavily crippled ships with 2 to 3 engines wrecked should have a chance to sink after battle if they are far from port.

    • Like 3
  6. 9 minutes ago, DerRichtigeArzt said:

    The option exists but its gray and non functional. The only way is to hope its gonna go back to a useful port. 

    I wonder why they don't just disable the baltic ports for now. They are useless in a conflict against britain and randomly make parts of your fleet useless.

×
×
  • Create New...