Pugwis
-
Posts
108 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Pugwis
-
-
On 19/01/2017 at 9:54 AM, SteelSandwich said:
I personally don't see it as a additional charge, since they already over delivered on their initial ship promise. This would open up the ability to get for example proper ship variation going with danish, swedish, dutch and spanish lines.
Because you don't see NA like an MMO, would you think it normal to pay for extra update in another MMO ? no, so why is this normal for NA to charge extra fee to deliver updates (especially that the game is not even finished) ?
Plus it is not a F2P or subscription one, but pay once to play forever game, so this is an extra charge that NA devs promised to never make (only cosmetics, ah really ?)
MMO need to be updated to keep being attractives after years and that there are no "over delivery" for this kind, otherwise the game will simply die due to lack of interest if there are nothing new.
And seriously, who want to spend more money for NA at the actual state ?Most of the points enumerated here seem to be odd and not really appealing, it is like if they have droped all hope and lowered the bar, NA is going down update after update.
-Pirates VS Pirates (no exploits, let me laugh)
-Remove mission to replace with daillies, we have never been so far from the good all quest like in potbs (that will never happen, at least we are fixed now)
-Retire option (cf. no content for hight lvl is going to be implemented)
-And last but not least, they don't even finish the game and they already start to sell extra ships for extra money, they promised not to do that in the begining, also this game isn't a free2play or subscription, that doesn't make any senses to pay for more if i already payed for full the games...Especially the fact that they not only talk about new ships, but also fixing the consti, soon they will tell us:
"we won't fix bugs in the games if you don't pay more, but not only, the kickstarter will aslo introduce new bugs that you will be able to pay for fixing later on, DUDES !"They have wasted lots of times in 2016 to change again and again the already implemented things instead of adding real content, so players loose interest into the game and now that they see the amount of player decreasing as well as the review, they once again plan to modify some aspect of the game that doesn't need to modified in priority, and they will lost peoples again i put money on that.
-
3
-
-
First off, I love this game and it's potential.
The suggestions I have, relate to immersion. To feeling like you're really there, in that day - instead of playing a game on a computer.
- Remove the way you look around on a ship. No Zoom in/out to see what's going.
- Players should actually be on deck, walking around, barking orders.
- For certain things, like shooting, allow the player to posses a gunner to aim, or scout in the crows nest.
- Everything should be first person perspective imho - you're likely to get sea sick for christs sake - how awesome would that be?
- When the guns shoot, the screen should shake,etc.
The next suggestion will help increase the amount of action a player sees in a given night.
- Allow the use of automated fleet routes.
- The officer/captain you assign, helps or hurts with that assignment - much like the perks now.
- Players can be wherever, doesnt matter. The fleet or fleets are sent out to their run their routes. If/when that fleet comes under attack, the player can "posses" the captain and effectively teleport to the bridge and get involved.
- In this way, players could have several fleets leaving with goods all at one time. Maybe one is a decoy? Maybe your just risky type and send out 3 very valuable trader fleets at the same time. Suddenly, two are under attack. Now you have to choose - and the other battle is managed by AI until your battle is over.
This can't happen in NA at this point, you are describing a new game concept wich will basically be a FPS, take a look at BlackWake and game of this kind, because reinventing NA is not a good idea...
-
2
-
-
The rope that hold the sails are not in the good position and don't react correctly, and that's why those rope and sails can "pass / cut" through the cordage that lead to the top mast.and other stuff like that...
It's just like in potbs, and old naval RPG, the rope are alway like this and that sucks.
-
You play a game in wich you watch peoples playing the game, try to imagine watching this on youtube.
Welcome to the navalception.
-
2
-
-
When you download something, you can execute or save the files, i alway choose execute.
Then i installed and run GPU-Z, but now i can't find it on the computer, but it was properly running once.
-
1
-
-
I downloaded GPU-Z yesterday, and tried it while playing another game, it was running in between 62 and 75 approximately, with a spike at 78,5 degree for CPU heat.
Today i would like to try it with naval action, but i can't find GPU-Z on my computer, either by searching option, or by going manually into all the C: folder, and even in the control panel in the list of installed program.
It doesn't sound normal to me if the program just disapear from my computer by magic, plus by searching on the GPU-Z forum to get some answer for this problem, i have read that this could make the computer freeze or disconnect the graphic card and other very disturbing problem, so im disapointed to get this installed on my computer, even more as i can't uninstall it as it is invisible everywhere, i just hope that this creepy program is not running in the background.
Then if i got to download it everytime that i want to use it, it's not going to happen, what i can say, is that my computer is only crashing with naval action, and run well with any other games.
Windows 7 family premium
Intel core i7 4930K 3,40 ghz
GTX 780
DDR3 8 GO ram 2133 mhz
Liquid cooling
If it's true that NA make my gpu overheat, then i can afirm that there is an issue with the last patch, i regularly clean my machine from dust and it is fully updated, and i am not even runing NA on maximum setting, it is more on the medium, wich is weird.
-
1
-
-
So trading will be great again!
i like that!
i'm a little worried about this, because if a new player is generated in a large nation he need to sail from the capital to the missions for hours.
can it be only after the first rank?
i ask this only because if i think like a new player with 0 gold, make a travel of hours can be frustrating.
No matter at wich rank, do you think it is only frustrating for new players to sails for 2 hours ? To finaly end up ganked by outnumbering AI and players ?
This idea simply sucks, i just hope this will never make it to the game, otherwise i doubt i will keep playing it.
-
Mission change, woah, so bad idea...
Already boring as hell to do mission concidering the long travel and the AI is alway outnumbering in BR and in numbers, and now, you want to bring some opportunity for gankers to join the battle ?
As a Flag cpt. im playing Flag cpt. fleet order, using a 3rd rate here is the balance:
-Allies: 2x 3rd Rate (including mine), 2x Constitution, 2x Ingermanlan
-Ennemeies: 1x Bellona 2x 3rd Rate, 2x Constitution, 2x Ingermanland
It is even worse if i play post captain fleet order or so, with Frig or Consti, 3 or 4 AI ships outnumber our side.
That is also easy to imagine how, even a basic mission order is going to be impossible to accomplish, you, alone VS 2 AI ships + gankers.
And you want to bring possibility for players to join easily the opposite side ? Best condition to stop playing, maybe the playerbase is still too big for your taste...
-
1
-
-
Thank you, it also crashed yesterday during a battle (so far i never crashed outside a battle), but no loss (the loss only happens if you fail to reconnect before end of the battle, from what i figured out), just to let you know that the game doesn't seem to be stable since the last update, the game have sended repport each time so i hope you will find the issue(s).
I will wait for your next reply.
-
1
-
-
For the leak issue, it was possible to avoid it, and everybody was in the same boat.
Here i was unable to escape the sentence, the game crashed and took away my ship dura and my crew.
Plus 500 gold for one crewman is just a sick joke, where is my press gang ?
-
1
-
-
I love your skillful video Z4ys, but i must admit that i don't like your proposal, this is awesome to make huge battle in this game, and there should never be a limitation on number of participating players or AI.
I totally disagree, better to get ganked from time to time, than destroying the game for ever.
-
2
-
-
UP !
-
1
-
-
Hello, my game crashed twice in less than 5 minutes this morning.
First time, it was fine, i was against a trader and able to reconect with no harm done.
Second time, just after this battle, i got pulled into a battle against a single lynx, by a player cutter, there was like 8 allies AI in battle, (3rd rate frigates), just to let you know that it was unwanted and unescesary.
I tried to reconnect as fast as possible, but the game slowly sended the 2 report before i can relog (even if the 1st crash report was already sent few seconds ago, he sended it again...).
So i was unable to reconnect before end of the battle as the pickle is really weak, and i found myself on the reward screen (what's a reward...) to see that not only my fleet ship (Gold Cerberus) have lost one dura point, but it have also lost the 170 mens that was onboard.
I must ask for compensation as the crash is entirely responsible for the loss. (I could also name the player that pulled me in this useless battle, but exept for relaxing my nerves, this doesn't serve any purpose)
The Cerberus was exceptional quality and will never be able to be sold on the market again due to the 4 dura, also it cost me 85 000 to hire the magically disapeared crew, there is no benefit in playing this game if you can loose so much money in a fraction.
Hope you can do something for me.
-
1
-
-
You just forget the most important line:
"Should pirates be able to get reward (xp/gold/loot) when attacking other pirates ? *NO *NO "
-Pirates should not be a nation, but a flag.
-Pirates should not be able to sail SoL while displaying pirate flag.
-Pirates should not own any port.
-Pirates should get tagged on sight by any non-trader NPC / NPC-fleet and sane players.
-Pirates are [censored] ...
-
3
-
-
Soon we gona port battle in indiaman.
-
1
-
-
What a horrible day! One to forget, not remember!Devs, if you want to honor this day, free rum rations in all free ports, to be used for a period of 24 hours by all players. Come on, break the rules and just do it. Please?
What ? so you just fill all the slots of all your outpost with rum, to become the richest man of the 7 seas after this day ?
-
1
-
-
It's normal that you can't see during rain or tempest, i hope this will not be added...
-
1
-
-
Add some more crew (Officers on the quarter deck, helmsmen and maybe marines - if they are equipped)
- Add some more crew (Officers on the quarter deck, helmsmen and maybe marines - if they are equipped)
That's something i really want to see, more crew, on the canons and on the masts, as well as marines (also in top masts), eventually shooting with muskets at close range to kill some crew and add some smoke, like in commander conquest of america and napoleon total war (if i am not wrong).
And mobile gunports, also verry important in my opinion, especially for trader ships that got no canon but still got gun port opened and canon shadow...
As well as the rear gunports on the lynx and some other ships, would be nice to enclose them, or allow us to add small canon in it, there are other ships in this case.
And some swivels gun, wouldn't be disapointing.
-
1
-
Assault fleet construction still allows for some trolling potential
Sound good to me.
-
1
-
-
Sigh.
When will people learn this is never a valid argument? Keyboards and mouses just doesn't fit with the era of gameplay. For cryin out loud, the word gameplay just doesn't fit with the era of gameplay.
Your post is not period viable either. Should forums be hard-modded, so that everyone who does not post according to ye oldie rules is banned? Should we switch to mailing lists, and I don't mean e-mailing?
Would that be either fun or efficient?
Something being or not being 100% history accurate is never an argument by itself. How this accuracy does or doesn't affect gameplay, fun, efficiency of the system and so on - these are arguments that are interesting. These, that you did not touch on.
Don't get the point here.
Anyway, it is a bad idea, gold is good like it is now.
-
1
-
-
Not sure why, maybe it is happening in 1vs1 battles only or due to timer.
I have crashed today during a battle with multiple ships, and was still in the battle at my reconnection.
But i know someone of my clan that crashed once, and was not able to reconnect after some time and he didn't get back in the battle (his ship was surrendering before).
So my guess is that you took too many time to reconnect and the game ended the battle.
-
1
-
-
Disagree ! Let's stick to the 17th century rules.
-
1
-
-
There is a problem with your poll, we can't vote "never".
No matter what we vote now, that mean we approve the idea...
-
2
-
-
When the crew hiring patch comes in, you will be able to hire marines so the marines module will probably be removed when the patch hits, so i wouldnt expect any changes to the marines modules.
Sound good.
-
1
-
What a horrible day! One to forget, not remember!
Content plans for the first half of 2017
in News Announcements & Important discussions
Posted
That make no sense since the game is not even finished, but else, i got the point...