mk4m
-
Posts
45 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by mk4m
-
-
5 hours ago, Skeksis said:
Unfortunately I have to disagree, again! Other than the 50 ship cap per side, DO NOT CAP BATTLES ANY LESS. Monster battles is the BEST PART OF THE GAME.
Just 1 vote for the other team. Actually, currently, all battles are rather balanced, some big ones, some little ones, some outnumbered ones, all pretty damn good.
Sorry, for me "monster battless" is bad and annoying, the worst part of the game.
-
6
-
-
Refits captured ships will be nice, and 100% historical.
Russian Orel refits by japans, before and after:
-
3
-
-
48 minutes ago, The PC Collector said:
The point still stands. Most CL hulls (especially early ones, the worst offender being the semi armoured hulls, which are based on a real CL which carried lots of casemate mains) are clearly designed to have casemate main guns, and the game not allowing them significantly cripples them. Honestly I don't understand how the devs could make such a mistake considering that casemate mains on CLs where a common thing even until the late 1920s.
Historical many protected and armoured cruisers have main guns in casemates.
-
4
-
-
53 minutes ago, Urst said:
For the latter suggestion, what defines a Light Cruiser is quite literally nothing more than the size of the ships guns. A CL has a maximum gun size of 6" according to history, while a CA has a maximum gun size of 8". Anything larger than 6" bumps the ship into being a CA by virtue of how large the hull would have to be to support anything larger, and same thing for the CA. The Deutchland-class aren't CA, but small BBs. They're literally called "Pocket Battleships".
To the former, a 5.9" gun still isn't as good as a 6" gun damage-wise and penetration-wise. (Despite weighing more)
Many light cruisers in pre-dreadhnout era have 8" amd 10" main guns.
-
6
-
-
The AI still build very cheap and poor ships, many of them. Hordes of cheap poor ships.
-
Maybe reinforcements it's good solution. Battle begin between maximum 10-20 heavy ships, and more small ships come after some time. If main squad defeated before reinforcements arrive - the battle ends.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, The PC Collector said:
So, according to the devs, this is normal? No cheat engines, no save editing, no nothing. I insist that taskforces should have a hard cap on the number of ships. My computer couldn't even run the battle.
I have same problems, no cheats. Never used cheats in this game
-
3
-
-
Bug found - the AI not building new ships, almost. So after few defeats AI lost the fleet and loses the game.
-
Still too many ships involved in battles, it's ruined the game.
-
3
-
-
2 hours ago, kineuhansen said:
game freeze is nothing new when i play a campaign and click next turn a couble of times and then the game freeze and when i click right mouse the game crash also please fix the damn slow loading time for when you start a new campaign take like forever
Interesting, i don't have any crashes or freezes
-
6 minutes ago, Aloeus said:
I'm getting a lot of cases where I will accept a peace treaty but then the game will continue the war. I'd like to not be continually at war because I can never make a peace treaty.
Sometimes helps return all you ships to the bases.
-
12 minutes ago, Sturmalex said:
Thats a Deutschland-Class though and about 15/5 years after 1890, 1900 respectively. Imo BB hulls are fine right now. Its the heavy cruiser that needs some love.
Ok, this Hessen, building beginning in 1902.
Seriously, most german pre-dreadhnout battleships have much better hulls then presented in the game
-
1
-
-
42 minutes ago, Sturmalex said:
The BB-hull corrosponds to the Kaiser Friedrich III-class battleships. The Heavy cruisers though... I dont know. I havent found a single heavy cruiser to correspond to the BB-Copy-Hull. Realistically the "semi-armored cruiser" hull should be Germany's heavy cruiser hull. Looks a lot like the SMS Fürst Bismarck
This hull will be fine
-
1
-
-
German heavy cruisers and battleships in 1890 and 1900 weird, maybe need to add more different hulls?
-
1
-
-
Major problem for me - the battles are too big. 50+ ships for each side is pain and not historical.
And still have problems with boats on French hulls.
-
2
-
-
No gun caliber downsize ?
-
Please more focus on ironclad era, more hulls, turrets (correct french turrets), authentic gun calibers..
And more important - torpedoes needs serious rework. Less accurate, no spamming.
Maybe add more scenarios start options - 1895, 1905? I love pre-dreadhnout ships and battles, hate torpedoes:)
-
3
-
-
Are there any plans to correct the models of the turrets of the main caliber guns of the French pre-dreadnouths?
-
A few suggestions to improve the realism:
Weaken the destroyers of 1890 and 1900, reduce their size, resistance to damage and flooding. Destroyers of that time were not able to attack intact large warships on the high seas during a squadron battle, as a rule, they simply could not fight on the high seas, especially in rough seas.
To give later destroyers and cruisers the ability to fire torpedoes at selected areas and directions, and not just at a specific target - as has happened since the First World War.
Allow artillery and torpedo tubes to track the selected target without opening fire.
To enable artillery ships to fire at several different targets with the same caliber at the same time, including from different sides - as it happened in reality.
Shooting torpedoes between battleships is nonsense, in history such attempts were, of course, with zero result.
The message was written with the help of a google translator, please treat with understanding.-
3
-
>>> v1.06-1.08+ Feedback<<<(17/8/2022)
in General Discussions
Posted · Edited by mk4m
Maybe, for now the AI not fight in formations and not keep formations, almost every battle is big mess. Impossible recreate Tsushima or Jutland.