Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

masterofn0ne

Ensign
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by masterofn0ne

  1. I appreciate the WASD control system mentioned elswhere, but really the point-and-click of E:TW is maybe closer to a captain's experience. 

     

    why not both WASD and point-and-click? 

     

    zoom out and the captain can tell the helmsman/master to go "there", and they will navigate as best they can, but the captain should be able to take over the helm when he feels it is necessary (navigating tricky passages, for example). same with gunnery, no?

  2. My hope is that there is a lot of crossover. I know there is a large debate about the "simulation vs. arcade" nature of this game, but i think there should be ways to accomodate both, with realistic sailing that doesnt require a non-sailor to learn how to sail a square-rigger (I myself have been sailing most of my life, but have never set foot on the deck of a square-rigged ship).

    • Like 1
  3. at a certain point, the game must take the decision out of human hands to prevent the irrational and trolling behavior that would otherwise ruin the gameplay.

    Once a ship suffers too many casualties, the crew will naturally run down into the hold or otherwise stop fighting from exhaustion, demoralization or plain attrition. In this case, the officers should either automatically surrender the ship, be considered disabled/killed, or the game should communicate to the opponent that a boarding action would now result in effortless victory.

     

    My thoughts exactly! If you read accounts of historical single-ships actions, there are a couple of things that stand out: 1) most actions end with one boat fleeing; 2) the ones that don't rarely end up with one of the boats being totally destroyed; 3) casualties on the losing side are usually limited to 10-20% percent of crew (and that's a heavy battle), which implies that most battles end in surrender

×
×
  • Create New...