Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

MDDonnergott

Ensign
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MDDonnergott

  1. Alright I didn't thought that people would take this matter this serious.

    I've played this game since release and comparing this event with all the bullshit other people did to gain an advantage over others is just laughable in my opinion.

    Just to make it absolutly clear: I did not go into the battle hoping to kill "friendlies", my intention was to gain as much damage for the patrol mission as possible.

    I also recorded and uploaded the video because I didn't think I was doing something wrong, if that would have been the case I wouldn't even have replied to this thread and never would've uploaded the video.

     

    All this could have been avoided if it would be possible to have multi nation battles, but I guess we will never see that. I hope you will understand my thought process now.

  2. Hey guys,

    after a friendly fireshipped some battles before it turned out he gained a lot of dmg for the patrol mission that way.

    So I decided to fit the Requin for maximum fire probability, fir trim+Grenades+Open Magazine Access+Pheonix Figure.

    I joined the Russian side thinking it would be safer to live long enough to be able to explode.

    My intention was to damage the danish ships as much as possible since friendly fire damage doesn't add to your patrol mission total damage done.

    However it also happened that the russians were around me too, I personally don't feel bad about it but still wanted to clarify that I wasn't there just to kill "friendlies".

     

  3. 1 minute ago, Jameson BH said:

    Good to see Naval Action alive and well, had expected it to be dead as a dodo by now. Miracles do happen but having tested some of the gameplay, wow wtf have you done to the game devs, you really dont want this game to succeed, dont think I ve ever witnessed so much incompetence in bringing a game to fruition from a set of devs. Anyway back on topic, there is NO exploiting here, they fought a port battle, one side won, one side lost. Anyone who cannot see who the real target here is needs to wake up and smell the heather burning. This is an attempt by factions within the game and devs to remove Lord Vicious and continue the move away from a successful OW sandbox to a new microtransaction filled Arena mode Naval action legends. Why are the devs and mods so set against this game succeeeding because they are being dishonest with you. The decision has been made that the OW is not a project worth pursuing financially and rather than be honest and give us refunds they will give us a world of tanks style game with loads of microtransactions to bleed more cash from us. You heard it here first. Why oh why do the devs hate their own game so much, why oh why do they constantly ban and remove any form of criticism of their decisions. The real exploiters here are the Naval action devs, tell us the truth, you dont want this product that we bought to succeed because you know you can make more cash from Arena style, gold ammo, paint scheme, op p2W ships. Sorry and the french did nothing wrong, we are all being exploited by these charlatans. This post probably wont see the light of day, quelle surpise. 

    There is no way that you truely believe arranging pbs where bove parties agreeing on the outcome beforehand is in the spirit of this game.

    Farming each other for cmarks and gaining an advantage above others is NO exploitiing? Please look up the definition of exploiting.

    • Like 3
  4. 1 minute ago, Bountyhunter said:

    Simple we did NOT  receive 3 conquest marks each ! now answer my question is there an ulterior motive to why you would spend all night commenting this?

    And again I never stated you gained 3 conquest marks each, again please qoute me where I did so. I stated that you wouldn't have gained as many if the french wouldn't have shown up and you gaining K/A= conquest marks.

  5. 2 minutes ago, Cabral said:

     But that's not the point. The french already admited that was all planned, and in the PB video and by the coments on the video, you can see clearly that the french player that spawned with Indef armed with cannons was breaking a party for which he hadn't been invited.

    It's also not true. As others before posted how to gain conquest mark and how many you would gain if it is NOT contested.

  6. 3 minutes ago, Bountyhunter said:

    You stated a fact that we received 3 conquest each, I am telling you that is not true! where did you get the information of what we received ?

    Just now, Bountyhunter said:

    You were stating incorrect information on a tribunal, that my friend is dishonest and again I ask due to the amount of time you have invested here is there another motive to your participation in this tribunal ?

    I ask you again please qoute my incorrect information.

  7. 23 minutes ago, Bountyhunter said:

    You stated a fact that we received 3 conquest each, I am telling you that is not true! where did you get the information of what we received ?

    Maybe you should go to sleep again you don't seem to be fully woke. Also again:The fact is still you wouldn't have gained as many conquest marks if it wouldn't have been "contested" and everybody gained a K/A.

  8. Just now, Bountyhunter said:

    I have just called you out for fabricating the facts (lying) ... maybe you should apologize or is there maybe another motive that has kept you up all night frothing crap ?

    I didn't lie at all. I was one of the fc in the Sant Iago pb and people that got K/A did gained marks. The fact is still you wouldn't have gained as many conquest marks if it wouldn't have been "contested" and everybody gained a K/A. Stay on topic.

  9. 1 minute ago, Bountyhunter said:

    I think you might be talking about PVP marks now dude ..... you defo dont have a clue, get some sleep buddy

     

    Look even it were pvp marks it still doesnt save you. Arraging fights to gain pvp/conquest marks is not allowed and you basically farmed them for the conquest/pvp marks.

    You want me to read this thread and all facts I already listed before for a good night story for you?

  10. Just now, Bountyhunter said:

    So you have no idea then... you have spent all night frothing on something you have no facts on.

    Yup I diddly do because I already was part of an legit pb(that we lost) people that got kills and assists gained marks. No K/A no marks. You are the one with no idea.

    • Like 1
  11. 1 minute ago, Bountyhunter said:

    We would have the same amount of conquest points if they didnt turn up ... stop your frothing!

    Execpt you wouldn't have. You need Kills/Assist to gain conquest marks. Therefore the amount of marks would have been way lower. (only getting kills for the towers/forts.

    • Like 1
  12. 2 minutes ago, Lord Vicious said:

    Damage farmers imply you farm, so farm the same ppl over and over. not once  you cant even properly quote your own rules

    Nobody said anything about damage farmers I think you ment to post that in another thread. This thread is the one where you guys arranged the PB of Cap Francois to gain Conquest Marks.

  13. 3 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

    How i report something i not planned?   :)

    3 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

    You made up things and pretend is fact, we didnt arrange who should win or lose :)  again admin have logs they can check our discussion.

     

    you just make up stuff and present it like is truth with no proof. at my home is called bullshitting

    You didn't arrange it? There you go:

    5 hours ago, Sauveur said:

     Good evening, we wish to write to you this evening in order to apologize concerning the Cap Français port battle.

    We assume in the name  of the Escadre Royale society the full responsibility of what has been reproached to us by the developers.

    We are a guild composed of pvp players, and we do not think wrong when we made this gesture.

    We are playing the game since the Alpha opening and we have always observed the terms and conditions since the release of the game.

    Our guild wished to settle in the area of Haiti, but our nation being splitted, we did not get the number of players we expected there. While we know that we are alone against several nations, we thought it would be opportune to find solutions with the pirates in order to ensure the continuity of a French gameplay on the island of Haiti thus allowing us to participate in various pvp action of the game community.

    5 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

    Find me a log in your server where i told them to not bring cannons plz

     

    i dare you    (i bet you can check my chat logs ) so find me where i told the french to not bring cannons  i didnt, they where supposed to bring a fleet and fight, then they realized they could not even full the port,and bringed in shit ships with no cannons becouse cannons cost x4 then the ships.  

     

    battle was arranged? yes

    told them to not bring cannons? nope theyr choice.

     

    5 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

     

    AGAIN devs can ban me if they find in my disccusions with france that i told them not to bring cannons, they have chat logs :) we arranged the fight on chat so they can track it,       They told me they bring a sacrifical fleet, and thats it

     

    5 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

     

    Yes fight was arranged

     

    no cannons? nope           you understand the difference?    unless you think 18? crapwood ships can sink 25 indifatigable and an aga 75 +armor long cannons So outcome would have been the same 

     

    4 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

    neither i did regards the cannons lucky for me all arrangement where done in chat so i call devs to check my discussion :)  i never told them not to bring cannons

     

    also if i would make such stupid arrangement why stream it? i would keep it secret it simply have no sense LOL

    i was expecting a fight thats why i stream  USE LOGIC GENIOUS

     

    4 hours ago, Lord Vicious said:

    Finally some LOGIC THX YOU

     

    Again i admit it was arranged, they bringed in a sacrifical fleet but was supposed to fight ,  I didnt recall RUS leaving a 4th rate pb when they bringed in a firstrate "they where testing"   so we went on, and "tested" how to kill a fleet with no cannons, we asked for? nope.

    But even if they got cannons they where outshipped, outnumbered, probably they didnt want to waste 2ml in cannons for a lost battle

     

     

     

    5 hours ago, toyameijin said:

    Dear Devs, we're customers, players, and testers of this game. We decided to implant our guild to Haïti, because we love PvP, and we know that this is the place to be. An opportunity was offered to us to have facilities since the new start of the game and we accepted it without us thinking badly, but we had always comply to the conditions and terms of the game, except this time. Please accept apologies of the team BAFF, and we will accept your sanctions.

     

    French version

    Chers développeurs, nous sommes clients, joueurs, et testeurs sur ce jeu. Nous avons décidé de nous implanter avec notre clan sur Haïti, car nous kiffons le PVP, et nous savions que c'était le lieu idéal pour satisfaire notre appétit. Une opportunité nous a été proposée pour nous faciliter le start après wipe et nous l'avons accepté sans penser à mal. Nous avons toujours été dans les règles, à l'exception de cette fois-ci. S'il vous plaît, veuillez accepter les excuses du clan BAFF, nous accepterons votre sanction.

     

    • Like 1
  14. Just now, Lord Vicious said:

    Another example when we used a france alt to  buy a flag for a sweden port and then trade to a pirate and make it a pirate pb  , it was all done with game mechanics, wich where not supposed to work that way.  we got demoted? nope

    it got fixed, you welcome,   my clan reported /find more exploit then anybody else

    Execpt that you didn't report this one and even knew you would gain an adavtage out of it.

    You can't come back from that all your posts untill now are referring to the french having no cannons, which is not the issue, or to old exploits that happened months ago which isn't even the topic.

    You do not point out why you guys did it and try not to mention the conquest marks which is the reason why you guys did it.

    You are making it even more obvious that way.

     

  15. Just now, Lord Vicious said:

    If they way is not intented they should not allow the way.     it was all done into game mechanics even if we didnt tell them to not bring cannons :)

     

    they not want it? they should not allow ships to undock with no cannons  otherwise if you apply same punishment/way of thinking

     

    when danes abused warsupply and was changed, they got demoted? it not was supposed to them to supplybomb that fast. but it was in the game mechanics at the time

    Sorry a little hard for me findign your actual point. But again it doesn't matter that the french had no cannons equipped you can stop writing that.

    Issue stays the same that you guys agreed opon an outcome and gain an advantage that is not intended that way. PB are not there so one side can be farmed and you know that.

  16. 1 minute ago, Lord Vicious said:

    that mirror is getting harder and harder to be climb

     

    if they not wanna this to happens they need to fix  by not allowing ships with no cannons to join pb since   you cant  give reponsability to one side if the other dont bring them end of story

    The french having no cannons is still not the issue. The issue is that you gained conquest marks in a way that is not intended. If you wouldn't have arranged them coming inside the pb and stay passive(cannon equipped or not) we wouldn't have this thread.

×
×
  • Create New...