Oneironz Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Hello Game Labs! Glad to see this masterpiece moving along this quickly! Although I have one small question regarding the basic cutter in the current Naval Action. The cutter is a ship that has a square rigged sail plan, with a big mainsail and one smaller on top. Though the in game cutter is lacking the main sail, only having the topsail. Why is this? Thank you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Valkenburg Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 This is actually a good question. I wonder if it has to do with the gameplay setup involving speed? Maybe they felt there was a conflict between the square-rigged mainsail and a main "spanker?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maturin Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 The square course and the gaff mainsail would almost never be used at the same time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Valkenburg Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 The square course and the gaff mainsail would almost never be used at the same time. That's kinda what I was getting at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneironz Posted January 26, 2016 Author Share Posted January 26, 2016 So, to get this straight. A cutter is a vessel, a bit longer and larger than a sloop, with a square rigged sail plan, in which there is a square course and a top sail? Being the ship still classified as a cutter if it only has the top sail deployed? Wouldn't the ship lack thrust power without the square course? Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brigand Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 The cutter has the cutter rig. The difference between the cutter and the sloop* is that a cutter typically has more head sails; at least more than one, typically three. All topsail from the 18th century were still almost invariably square (the gaff top was only introduced very late in the 18th century) In addition to the main sail (which is a gaff sail on a cutter rigged vessel), cutters of old typically also had a yard to fly a square course from. As Maturin already observed: it would be unlikely that a cutter would fly both square course and the gaff mainsail at the same time. ~Brigand *As with most sailing related 'definitions' you could have a discussion about this. Sailing terminology is not helped by the fact that the terms are used interchangeably by different countries, for a great many years, etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maturin Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 So, to get this straight. A cutter is a vessel, a bit longer and larger than a sloop, with a square rigged sail plan, in which there is a square course and a top sail? Being the ship still classified as a cutter if it only has the top sail deployed? Wouldn't the ship lack thrust power without the square course? Thank you. Actually, the only real difference between a cutter and a sloop is the location of the fore stay that supports the mast. In a sloop, the fore stay leads to the bowsprit, just like any other vessel. A cutter's fore stay leads directly to the hull on one side of the bowsprit. This means that the bowsprit can be run in onto the deck, protecting it in rough weather. Sloops can be quite a bit larger than cutters, and either can have square sails. If the NA cutter set a square mainsail at the same time as the gaff, the result would probably be less thrust, not more. When sailing close to the wind, the square mainsail could prevent wind from getting to the gaff mainsail. Basically you have a less efficient sail stealing power from the the more efficient one. With the wind astern, the situation is reversed. The inefficient gaff prevents the efficient mainsail from drawing correctly. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneironz Posted January 27, 2016 Author Share Posted January 27, 2016 Thank you for your in depth replies, it explained a lot to me. Even though using both sails at the same time could be cripling to the cutter's sailing performance, most european designs did use both sails at the same time. Is the NA model an european design? Or did the devs choose not to incude the mainsail because of performance reasons? Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maturin Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Is the NA model an european design? Or did the devs choose not to incude the mainsail because of performance reasons? Aesthetic reasons, I should think. Many cutters had very odd-looking sailplans, while Alert's is quite elegant. You either have a cutter that looks silly and inaccurate, or you have to add special coding so that the square mainsail furls automatically on the wind. Edit: Assuming models like this are correct, Alert actually set a square course without full drop: http://mmzone.co.kr/media/files/10900/mmzimg12753722977050.jpg This sort of sail also looks a little odd, but probably wouldn't interfere with the gaff mainsail too much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneironz Posted January 27, 2016 Author Share Posted January 27, 2016 That is all I wanted to know. The NA devs avoided the odd sail to make the ship more aesthetic, and avoid the pain of graphical bugs such as sail clipping? How often was that sail used anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now