Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum
Carl von Lichtenfels

Russia so bored they try to kill off smaller nations?

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, rediii said:

lol

Yea these few hardcore players that actually play/use the alliances shouldn't decide on them. They should be forced to work together with someone else! Because they would totally work together with their forced alliance.

Who needs sandbox in this sandbox game anyway

But it's not just your sandbox. 

41 minutes ago, Wyy said:

The thing is, the more you participate in the nation the more you should be able to share your opinion and have a bigger influence on the nations decisions, this would exclude alt voting which was some of the problems 2 years ago. Also if a player dont want his nation to be in an alliance the Pirate faction should be the obvious choice, because the pirate faction SHOULD have Outlaw battles

Voting with unequal voting weights will create endless drama. Forget it. Voting does not work. 

Edited by van Veen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 час назад ХатиРоку сказал:

Игроки не боятся потерять пиксели, но боятся потерять время. Время - самый ценный ресурс во вселенной, так что они правы, опасны потерять пиксели, которые стоят им часов. 

Только пиксели - худший аргумент за всю историю. Виртуальные предметы могут быть такими же ценными. 

Если у вас 30 кораблей, это не значит, что вы должны их потопить. Они имеют ценность. 

 

Then why keep 30 ships, but try to make and keep the best copy of the ship. 5/5 gold ship. For what purpose? 
So the game does not need this kind of upgrades for the ships? Shipyards should create "just" ships. Without options 3/5, 4/5, 5/5. No options, "simple", "magenta", "pink", "gold". Without additional additions to the characteristics so that they are not afraid to lose in battle.
The biggest loss of time when you come to the capital of the nation to fight and no one goes to battle. You are waiting, and the enemy does not come out. Or it will come out in five-fold advantage in the lineup. When you are going to leave this region.
I remember the times when the ships had 5 strength. The upgrades were not lost after the battle. And all the ports were filled with ships with 5 durability. They were also afraid of losing their pixel ship. Although there was a completely different game mechanics. It was a completely different game.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HachiRoku said:

The more skill based mechanics added to a game the larger the skill gap becomes. Less skilled players are not going to have the repair mods that skilled players have so the inventory gap is also bigger. 

and exactely about the effect of gear I'm complaining all the time

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
59 minutes ago, van Veen said:

Voting with unequal voting weights will create endless drama. Forget it. Voting does not work. 

This is on the same level as no voters in republic systems we have in our real life countries. Complaining on what should / shouldnt be done, yet the person choose not to vote.

The weights on the vote you have ingame could be classified out from pve rank, PvP rank, average playtime pr. Week etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Wyy said:

This is on the same level as no voters in republic systems we have in our real life countries. Complaining on what should / shouldnt be done, yet the person choose not to vote.

The weights on the vote you have ingame could be classified out from pve rank, PvP rank, average playtime pr. Week etc. 

Words can't describe how bad an idea that is.  That would mean the no-life, 24/7 players would own the game and the population would drop to them and their alts.  Players shouldn't vote on anything...ever.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Medniy Sandal said:

Then why keep 30 ships, but try to make and keep the best copy of the ship. 5/5 gold ship. For what purpose? 
So the game does not need this kind of upgrades for the ships? Shipyards should create "just" ships. Without options 3/5, 4/5, 5/5. No options, "simple", "magenta", "pink", "gold". Without additional additions to the characteristics so that they are not afraid to lose in battle.
The biggest loss of time when you come to the capital of the nation to fight and no one goes to battle. You are waiting, and the enemy does not come out. Or it will come out in five-fold advantage in the lineup. When you are going to leave this region.
I remember the times when the ships had 5 strength. The upgrades were not lost after the battle. And all the ports were filled with ships with 5 durability. They were also afraid of losing their pixel ship. Although there was a completely different game mechanics. It was a completely different game.

why own a ferrari enzo and never drive it? Its nice to look at and has value. 

The game doesn't need upgrades for ships but upgrades and mods are a nice thing to have because they add overall stratergy to the game. Besides that customization is always good. The problem with upgrades are there are to many and even more so are extremely overpowered by the fact that they have far higher bonuses because you can repair multiple times. 50% of the mods should be removed. In the old days lightweight ropes and blocks was one of the best mods ingame. Compared to the mods we have now its useless. The funny part is that Art of ship handling and gunnery encyclopedia are the hardest mods to get ingame yet not even that op. Its all the other hull bonuses, repair bonuses and armour bonuses stacked. The gap between the noob and pro is to much. Those ships are made even better by the fact that they have lots of repairs.  

I can tell you one thing I am 100% certain that multiple repairs are the single biggest problem in this game. Ever since we have had this bullshit the devs have not ONCE had any kind of "balance" in the game. That one addition has made combat design impossible. If they were removed things would improve a bit but there are other issues. I have had the argument with admin many times and so far he has no argument in favor of it other that "it makes the game more tactical" You can add a Nuclear bomb kill streak after 10 kills just like call of duty and also make the claim it is tactical. You can add a Turbo boost to the game and claim it is more tactical and it actually would be. That does not mean its a good thing. It means its stupid

Players do not like loosing ships because it is humiliating to be sank 10 times without success. I already said that making AI first rates capture is a good step BUT that it will not solve the fundamental problem of players not fighting. Expensive ships are bad but making them super cheap is also no a solution. 

The biggest problem in the game is that Good players SHOULD NOT be looking for PVP from some noobs outside KPR or other capitals. The game mechanic reward this behavior and human beings will always choose the easier fast way to gain what they want. How to change that is a problem in many games and I honestly do not know myself. I do know that removing the tools that gives good players such a major advantage is a step in the right direction. It doesn't matter however because I think that train has sailed. There is no chance this game can be saved anymore because its too old. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Lars Kjær said:

Why give you content when you're the only one having fun?

why is he a seal clubber that is wondering why noobs do not fight him?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Lars Kjær said:

Mechanics need to support content creation.. When contest becomes "I-win" scenarios, demands rigorous grinding and locks equipment behind permits, port bonus etc. the opposite side won't create content (i.e. PvP and PBs) and in its furthest extent deny the opponent content by simply not showing up for PBs or surrender in PvP matches..

why the new account were you banned? I was banned for 7 full days. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree that any modifications of the ships should be removed. No mods, no port bonus, no books. But a very sophisticated damage model installed with single spars to be shot away, ships only sinking when hit below the waterline, more focus on the crew  ( a trained crew, that survived several battles should work faster than a new crew. So keep your crew alive). Maybe even choosing single sails to be set...

That would be my game...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, van Veen said:

Yes. It was tested and did not work. People votes turned out to form two fixed blocks. Nothing changed. Voting did not change the alliance for a very long time. It got a stalemate. Many people complained heavily about it. Then the devs decided to drop alliances altogether and make PVP "all against all", instead of fixing and tweaking it. 

Yes and that decision was a complete failure. 1 or 2 more development iterations could have fixed the problem. Instead they've chosen the easy way: just drop it. The result is a superpower nation and the rest leaves the game (like i did).

Edited by Sven Silberbart
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lars Kjær said:

Why give you content when you're the only one having fun?

Now, you really are stupid!

If something should be punished in this game it should be this kind of atitude.

Not loosing a ship, nor loosing a port!

 

Edited by Riot stick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
3 hours ago, Angus MacDuff said:

Words can't describe how bad an idea that is.  That would mean the no-life, 24/7 players would own the game and the population would drop to them and their alts.  Players shouldn't vote on anything...ever.

Join pirates then if you dont want an alliance. 

Yes that would exactly mean that the players investing most of their time would deserve to have more of a say. If a player has an alt and plays for 2 peoples then so be it he deserves a bigger piece of the cake. 

What you're saying is that one guy that plays 2 hours pr month should have as much equal vote as one that spends maybe 20 hours in the game. What would it matter anyway for that one guy that wouldnt play as much. This kind of game needs player driven alliances, its historical and would do better for the game in the long therm. As its now nothing does good for the game, which is proven by the player base in decline which is more then halfed since release

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Tom Farseer said:

Erm... I think the math on that one does not quite check out...
10% being 7k damage means in total he would have to have had 70k HP all repairs included. Trincomalee's HP cap at just over 11.6k. And that is white Oak frame and planking, so definitely not a hunting build. Assuming you went the full 90 minutes and he repaired whenever possible that is 8 or 9 cycles. Since you cannot even reach close to 100% HP repaired per cycle, there is absolutely no way that evens out to 70k HP worth of damage received.

In general the game still is and always has been much more dependent on skill than on gear.
Just look at the actual numbers of the port boni: For example the difference between Hull 4 and no bonus at all on a White Oak Ocean is 1400 HP on each side. That is the equivalent of 8.3 hits with a 42pd long gun (168 dmg). Are you seriously telling me that is the deciding factor? Same goes for all the other boni, especially when comparing 45 point ports to 55 point ports.
The only part where gear can really make a difference is indeed repair stacking. But that only works when the captain has the skill to time his repairs, chose what to repair and when to disengage to repair. And it also needs an opponent who let's his enemy disengage to repair. So even here skill and decision making plays a huge part.

For those who cannot believe anything without seeing it. I never said that skill isn´t important. The widened gap caused by frankenships is what I focus on. And yes for your 8.3 hits with a damage of 168 each mutliplied with focused fire and maybe some extra-charge of 5 ships on a target without caratagena and whatsoever matters... but of course, like rediii the allknowing wiseguy here knows: everybody, literally everybody has these frankenships in the port-battles. wonder on what planet some people live. It isn´t of any use to point out  that tactics, decision-making is of importance too. That´s just common sense and not the philosopher´s stone. Best wishes, Gene

Screenshot_17-09-2019_20-23-01.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm  all I know is back when we didn't have PVP Marks, Repair Metas, Port Bonuses and 11 nations this game had 10x the amount of filled RVR battles on average every week tha nwe currently have now.  We also had an alliance system that was instrumental in filling those 25v25 battles.  What we have now is a game that was designed to accommodate 2000 players that does not function with 700.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if instead of alliances (or until alliances) small countries should all jump to a single no-longer small nation.  One which still has a decent ship-building capability.  Then if the zergs roll over that you can stick a fork in the game, its done.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Wyy said:

Yes that would exactly mean that the players investing most of their time would deserve to have more of a say.

It's a terribly bad idea to make a handful of hardcore players the rulers of the server, unless you are planning to get rid of all non-hardcore players anyway. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/2/2019 at 10:04 AM, Carl von Lichtenfels said:

So Russia decided its time to kill the rest of Prussian Pop? No better Enemies around then one of the smallest Nations? 

All this will achieve the Game dying faster, have a good day.

How bizarre....Playing a "hardcore" faction, complaining that another hardcore faction is attacking you..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Lars Kjær said:

Why give the zerg any content? Why shouldn't the zerg split into the many factions so we can get more evenly distributed players?

Why did we get the poorly designed frontline system? Forced to fight for the capital first, that should've been the end chapter of a story of regional conquest. Why the large BRs effectively removing the ability of smaller clans to actually engage in RvR?

The problem isn't the russian playerbase, it's shitty designed mechanics... What's even worse - we knew from EA that there's a clear powercreep in this game that could and did render nations uncompetitive.. We knew the effects of this was: players left the game. How on earth someone thought that port bonus' would be a grand idea then is beyond me. It doesn't take a genious to know that the powercreep would ensure that the 55p ports ended up in more or less the same hands. Especially since 3 of the 5 russian ports is in the mexican guld with only two free ports located more than an hours sail from NO or VC respectively. The other 55p port was placed in Nassau, of all places.. Basically an uncapturable port due to the buff on forts! How on earth could this not have been foreseen??! And the effect? - Players left. Will they come back now that ppl can't say "it's EA it might be improved in a later patch"?

Then comes the RoE, that basically ensures that hunting the larger factions is impossible since they either A gets a BR advantage in every match or B has 20 mins to get a BR advantage, and since they have the majority playerbase they will always be able to get the BR advantage. How could this not have been foreseen? Not to mention the shitrakings the new players got when they inadvertently joined a battle they shouldn't have, some even to the point of being tribunaled because "they're prob alts".. How can it be any wonder that the player retention rate is so low in a game so poorly designed?

I could go on, but honestly any1 saying that port bonus' doesn't matter are just not adept at simple calculus and any1 saying the RoE is functioning fine is just delusional or atleast so narcissistic that they can't see the newbie problem. Any1 saying the powercreep isn't an issue, well then answer me this:

Why do ppl  pay fx. 600k for carta refits? That's 6 boxes of shitlong sails in todays NA econ. If it doesn't matter why would ppl sail afk for hours to get it? If port bonus' doesn't matter, why don't Russia drop fx. Nassau and give it to a smaller faction then? If the powercreep doesn't matter why then do Russia get more and more players by the day? I'd reheeeally like to see the most recent playerdistribution if it's possible @qw569?

Answer me this:

Why is players leaving if the mechanics are great?

Oh, you are so right. This is the "complete edition of biggest game design fails in NA". I cant agree more, but I lost hope that the devs ever understand that.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Lars Kjær said:

Answer me this:

Why is players leaving if the mechanics are great?

 

 For me at least I am having much more fun/time in other games, latest one is Battletech which i got with 2 expansion packs from humble bundle monthly which was $9 (12 normally but had $3 discount) and i get a selection of games on 4th Oct also which most probably will be no interest but still.

I log into NA look at what i need/want to do...

Kill missions PvE - 5th rates i need to sail an hour set up outpost, ship repairs, tow/sail ship over..

Kill missions PvP - Sail 1-3 hours looking for a fight only to find mostly teams of 3-4 players on gank fests (what ever happened to lone hunters?)

Cargo missions - Sail hours while watching netflix or playing another game alt/tabbing out to see if am near destination.

 

So what tends to happen is i will fight couple 6th rates outside capital to open slots, then go play something i can get some fun out of.  I know is a sailing game so travel is expected but the whole realism guys obsession with huge time sinks, making lineships rare, etc  has made NA feel like going to work.

Somewhere along the testing fun seems to have been forgotten, balance has always been an issue throughout testing and seems like nothing has been learned.

So we are left with a population mostly consisting of the ones that stuck through testing who mostly joined the same powerbases, and game design with port bonuses/ship permits created initial huge demand for combat marks..... which of course meant new guys were raped constantly around capital waters...

 

 Combat mechanics are great, although forts are insane (again balancing issue) and have made motar brigs useless and may as well be removed from game if stay same as is current situation. 

 Port bonuses would be ok if say craft level influenced how many of the bonus points could be used perhaps 1 per craft level and crafter chooses which ones from levels available (no more mass produced frankenships) but ofc would need a wipe as game flooded with them which would be a disaster. 

 Open world is sterile, AI at moment are just comedy zombie things in open world so perhaps if done right AI reacting would be a good thing for game.  Finally i think removing the protected zones/rienforcements was a really bad idea, but gotta keep the spawn campers happy... genius move.

 I really hope NA is fun again and that the playerbase grows, but currently i don't see it happening. If devs think adding a wind button people can press to travel quicker will make people sit watching empty sea for an age instead of alt/tab netflix or whatever there really is little hope i think.

  I have had fun in NA and many hours so can't complain personally, but I really hope devs have a master plan that will succeed.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Severus Snape said:

Hm  all I know is back when we didn't have PVP Marks, Repair Metas, Port Bonuses and 11 nations this game had 10x the amount of filled RVR battles on average every week tha nwe currently have now.  We also had an alliance system that was instrumental in filling those 25v25 battles.  What we have now is a game that was designed to accommodate 2000 players that does not function with 700.  

May be, port battle limits (BR), should be daily adjusted during server maintenance, taking into account the max/average game populations during the last 7 days. A new routine to write for developpers, but this could be an exit way from this RVR max BR concern. Self adapting to the future population. We could reach again 25v25 when the population will rise-up again (saying optimistic).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Aquillas said:

May be, port battle limits (BR), should be daily adjusted during server maintenance, taking into account the max/average game populations during the last 7 days. A new routine to write for developpers, but this could be an exit way from this RVR max BR concern. Self adapting to the future population. We could reach again 25v25 when the population will rise-up again (saying optimistic).

But in the past we were able to fill 25v25 port battles with less overall server pop numbers.  what we had was an alliance system, no repair metas and cheap/easily obtainable ships.  

The size of the battles is a small issue, but I don't think the main one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Severus Snape said:

But in the past we were able to fill 25v25 port battles with less overall server pop numbers.  what we had was an alliance system, no repair metas and cheap/easily obtainable ships.  

The size of the battles is a small issue, but I don't think the main one.

We have lots of issues but the BR size in PB  is one of the main. Of course even with lower BR a huge fleet can easily screen out attacker but thats not the point. It is just boring to have 20+ concrete bricks sailing around in 20000 BR PB. Allso smal nations have a big disadvantage to participate. Look at all the players that joined Russia. Why might they have done that? Its so sad and boring.

Edited by Sir Loorkon
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Sir Loorkon said:

We have lots of issues but the BR size in PB  is one of the main. Of course even with lower BR a huge fleet can easily screen out attacker but thats not the point. It is just boring to have 20+ concrete bricks sailing around in 20000 BR PB. Allso smal nations have a big disadvantage to participate. Look at all the players that joined Russia. Why might they have done that? Its so sad and boring.

Or all the players that joined the Dutch.  Right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Staunberg said:

Well might not be a bad thing.

We had some great wars between Russia and Sweden before. That got almost every nation to chose a side to support.

Would be great if the same could happen with Russia and VP. But honnestly doubt it will happend.

it's almost as if there were less, more populated nations (rather than 11) RVR and activity might increase.  Of course Russia / GB / Dutch are all similar in population size according to @qw569's pie charts a while ago.....only one of those nations actively tries to keep it's members active.

Are current port BRs a problem?  Yes.  I think the larger issue however is how diluted the game is with 11 nations and no alliance system.  Large BR ports would work if we only had a handful of nations and could easily fill 25 on 25 port battles.  

Edited by Severus Snape
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alliances wont fix the problem that the game forces you into so much boring shit instead of focussing on combat.

 

braindead pve - braindead passengers - braindead afk trading

braindead no action :(

 

Edited by Jon Snow lets go
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...