Gamover Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) @admin Прошу обратить внимание на корабль Конститьюшин. На мой взгляд на данном этапе игры это замечательное легендарное судно практически не боеспособно в бою против игроков. Проблема же заключается в расчёте урона по мачтам и наличии бом-брам-стеньг у этого корабля. А именн, бом-брам-стеньги в модели повреждения идут вместе с брам-стеньгами, которые крайне легко сбить (хватает двух попадание без чарджей). Как итог, всего шестью попаданиями по брам-стеньгам даже с большого расстояния этот корабль можно оставить с чуть больше, чем 40% парусов. Фиты в данном случае почти бесполезны, потому что и хп и толщина брам-стеньг крайне мала. Как предложение можно перераспределить "объединение" секций, а именно: мачта - это нижняя секция, для неё ничего не меняется стеньга и брам-стеньга - это средняя секция (только для кораблей с бом-брам-среньгами) бом-брам-стеньга - это верхняя секция Без изменения механики сбивания мачт, без кардинальных изменений в корабле, он может стать отличной боевой единицей в пвп. Edited February 2, 2018 by Gamover 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landsman Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 I don't speak russian but yeah, it needs some serious buff... if its complete garbage turnrate is to stay it needs some serious buff to speed and maybe bounce / ricochet potentional. "Old ironsides" ? .... ? more like "I can't really turn so put your iron into my sides... at a clean 90° "? Constitution thickness might seem decent on paper but it doesn't mean jackshit, if it turns like a hello kittyin 1st rate coupled with the remaining qualities of of a 4th rate.... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean Ribault Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Landsman said: I don't speak russian but yeah, it needs some serious buff... if its complete garbage turnrate is to stay it needs some serious buff to speed and maybe bounce / ricochet potentional. "Old ironsides" ? .... ? more like "I can't really turn so put your iron into my sides... at a clean 90° "? Constitution thickness might seem decent on paper but it doesn't mean jackshit, if it turns like a hello kittyin 1st rate coupled with the remaining qualities of of a 4th rate.... Couldn't agree more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landsman Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Intrepido said: Constitution turnrate: 2.37 ... Vic, 2.21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HachiRoku Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 18 minutes ago, Gamover said: @admin Прошу обратить внимание на корабль Конститьюшин. На мой взгляд на данном этапе игры это замечательное легендарное судно практически не боеспособно в бою против игроков. Проблема же заключается в расчёте урона по мачтам и наличии бом-брам-стеньг у этого корабля. А именно бом-брам-стеньги в модели повреждения идут вместе с брам-стеньгами, которые крайне легко сбить (хватает двух попадание без чарджей). Как итог, всего шестью попаданиями по брам-стеньгам даже с большого расстояния это корабль можно оставить с чуть больше, чем 40% парусов. Фиты в данном случае почти бесполезны, потому что и хп и толщина брам-стеньг крайне мала. Как предложение можно перераспределить "объединение" секций, а именно: мачта - это нижняя секция, для неё ничего не меняется стеньга и брам-стеньга - это средняя секция (только для кораблей с бом-брам-среньгами) бом-брам-стеньга - это верхняя секция Без изменения механики сбивания мачт, без кардинальных изменений в корабле, он может стать отличной боевой единицей в пвп. I translated to English: Connie is shit and needs turn buff! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamover Posted February 2, 2018 Author Share Posted February 2, 2018 I think you should translate before post here. 6 shots with balls and connie have 40-45% of sails. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bragan Benigaris Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 Извините за использование google ...В настоящее время существуют две версии Connie В фактических данных API. Я полагаю, что разработчики возились с ее парусным профилем .. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moscalb Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 LuL 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victor Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 hour ago, HachiRoku said: I translated to English: Connie is shit and needs turn buff! agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HachiRoku Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, Gamover said: I think you should translate before post here. 6 shots with balls and connie have 40-45% of sails. that is not a connie issue. Issue is that top section hp. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10MmWCZP2C1ea0FMjmI_m5-MMlYTwNfHjJQ5N2UuLZw8/edit#gid=0 thickness is not up to date Edited February 2, 2018 by HachiRoku Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thonys Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) @Moscalb that is gun issue (and i like it , use of guns are important ) not conti issue you can make it in any ship Edited February 2, 2018 by Thonys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamover Posted February 2, 2018 Author Share Posted February 2, 2018 10 minutes ago, Thonys said: @Moscalb that is gun issue (and i like it , use of guns are important ) not conti issue you can make it in any ship "any ship" will lost 10-30% of sails in that case, and constitution lose 55-60% 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admin Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 4 minutes ago, Gamover said: "any ship" will lost 10-30% of sails in that case, and constitution lose 55-60% yes all ships with topgallants royals need ADDITIONAL buff for sections 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Boyle Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 19 minutes ago, admin said: yes all ships with topgallants royals need ADDITIONAL buff for sections Новая моделька к релизу будет? Или текущая останется. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thonys Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, admin said: yes all ships with topgallants royals need ADDITIONAL buff for sections please not too much ...! ( not like a big buff) also the power of a ball is enormous..on a topgallant (it is not a big tree) i rather see... that the damage for losing a topgallant, has not to much impact on the overall sail damage...(do not make it to easy to make damage on overall sail damage number) ------------------------------------------------------------------- additional feature: also critical damage to mast : (delay on mast fall when having full force of the wind in the full sails ,what means you have to lower sails to keep the mast straight up when force of wind is at max it breaks mast too (10 minutes later) repair is necessary on forehand) Edited February 2, 2018 by Thonys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HachiRoku Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Gamover said: "any ship" will lost 10-30% of sails in that case, and constitution lose 55-60% endy to if im not mistaking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now