Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

monk33y

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, HachiRoku said:

who won??? I cannot understand Chinese. 

Pyrrhic victory,Our conductor has problems, and some players enter Pb for the first time. 

Lama was very brave and applauded them. 

(My network is in trouble, so I'm not in the battle. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎30‎/‎2019 at 7:20 AM, Pobols said:

 

Pobols,

Thx for that epical battle, I admire your cold-blood  !!

No many players in this server would have get out of this gank alive,

(I like your spirit shouting and cheering on your own  :lol:)

Spain would need players like you, maybe one day the old guards will be Spanish again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hace 13 horas, Celtiberofrog dijo:

Pobols,

Gracias por esa batalla épica, ¡admiro tu sangre fría!

No muchos jugadores en este servidor habrían salido vivos de este gank,

(Me gusta tu espíritu gritando y animando por tu cuenta  : lol:)

España necesitaría jugadores como tú, tal vez algún día los viejos guardias volverán a ser españoles.

Gracias frog, la suerte estaba de mi lado ese día.

Edited by Pobols
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Captain2Strong said:

you can see the result by looking at the colors, the only difference is that you can't recognize whether the red marked words mean sank or captured

I was kidding. Its kind of obvious........ 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PB for Walker's Cay:
VP Commander: Gregory Rainsborough  (part time Ghello Card), advised by yours truly.
RU Commander: Anolytic (I assume)20191004161805_1.thumb.jpg.df9504ef1d2036fa5b5bc7dd130789f9.jpg

Summary:
After having quite some trouble with overall cohesion in the PBs the day before, we kinda got our act together this time. 
Niquesse did a splendid job of demasting Zarskaya in the first few minutes, killing him before reinforcements arrived, keeping B in our control for the time being. After Lenin (God of Multiboxing :D ) got both his accounts into B Niquesse had to retreat to the tower and eventually left, being in no position to fight anymore. Saved us the points we would have lost if he sank.
I tried to harass Slaughterer and Imperator Aleksandr in C but with our own Square Fort demasting me (nice positioning, Slaughterer) I chose not to engage and instead bide my time for the next wind shift.

Main fleets met at A after an initial waiting period, VP had the wind by a hair's width and a slight numbers advantage. The brawl went less than ideal but much better than last time. Greg had to step out and Ghello Card kindly took over command for a few minutes until his return
. After not seeing an opportunity to sucessfully conest C I went to join the main battle, the Russians from C coming in behind me. The additional two ships vs my one were not enough to tip the balance however and with a few minutes to go we sank all remaining enemy ships.

Thanks for the nice fight to everyone involved.

Farseer

PS: Repair stack STRONK (you know who you are ;)  )

 

Edited by Tom Farseer
speeling
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mascarino said:

That's to compensate his lack of skill. 

If thats the case there's very little skill to be found in NA nowadays. They should switch back to 2 reps per battle system so i can rip on all the shitters that will cry bloody murder on the forums when they find out they cant just play like an asshole and then print a new ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Staunberg said:

Yep remove port bonus. Should never have been ingame. We have a 55 point port, Sweden don’t. It just give us to much of an edge. 

development can also increase the port points  x2

problem solved.

what i see most is the delete word
instead of the word increase
throwing up restrictions yourself is a bump in the hand of development
throwing in your own glasses is also a referring word.

impose restrictions on yourself bears witness to a slavish character
instead of a free trader :) (quote of the day)

 

water travel starts with trade
  protecting them starts with armed ships
  what came first
the chicken or the egg (second quote in one day )

 

shouting about topics done by short-sightedness are words in the darkness.
the thinkers think their words, and are not seen in the light of the chaotic world. (thirt quote)

third quote in one day i am on a role here!
  or not
I think .... and I don't think so!

lol

Edited by Thonys
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Thonys said:

development can also increase the port points  x2

problem solved.

what i see most is the delete word
instead of the word increase
throwing up restrictions yourself is a bump in the hand of development
throwing in your own glasses is also a referring word.

impose restrictions on yourself bears witness to a slavish character
instead of a free trader :)

In a post of mine on suggestion section i was referring to that exactly. Do not remove 55 port bonus just increase the ports with it so every nation can have one or the ability to have one.

As for Lars and Staunberg you have my compliments sirs not only for bringing this issue up but for doing so after a PB against Swedes. Very nice approach and an example of a healthy community in general.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

elements and supporters of the option> delete port bonus as a solution.
are people who have a different agenda than what they are actually fighting for, they see the benefit but the solution is a side issue.
false champions for their own abominable gain.
the destruction for their own gain at the expense of others.
maybe these evil elements should actually be removed.

pief paf poof maniacs without brain cells
chain them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...